Finite element analysis of the femur during stance phase of gait based on musculoskeletal model simulation.

In this study, the accuracy of the inputs required for finite element analysis, which is mainly used for the biomechanical analysis of bones, was improved. To ensure a muscle force and joint contact force similar to the actual values, a musculoskeletal model that was based on the actual gait experiment was used. Gait data were obtained from a healthy male adult aged 29 who had no history of musculoskeletal disease and walked normally (171 cm height and 72 kg weight), and were used as inputs for the musculoskeletal model simulation to determine the muscle force and joint contact force. Among the phases of gait, which is the most common activity in daily life, the stance phase is the most affected by the load. The results data were extracted from five events in the stance phase: heel contact (ST1), loading response (ST2), early mid-stance (ST2), late mid-stance (ST4), and terminal stance (ST5). The results were used as the inputs for the finite element model that was formed using 1.5mm intervals computed tomography (CT) images and the maximum Von-Mises stress and the maximum Von-Mises strain of the right femur were examined. The maximum stress and strain were lowest at the ST4. The maximum values for the femur occurred in the medial part and then in the lateral part after the mid-stance. In this study, the results of the musculoskeletal model simulation using the inverse-dynamic analysis were utilized to improve the accuracy of the inputs, which affected the finite element analysis results, and the possibility of the bone-specific analysis according to the lapse of time was examined.

[1]  T. Hattori Body up-down acceleration in kinematic gait analysis in comparison with the vertical ground reaction force. , 1998, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[2]  Nina S Sverdlova,et al.  Principles of determination and verification of muscle forces in the human musculoskeletal system: Muscle forces to minimise bending stress. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Alfred D. Grant Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function , 2010 .

[4]  W. Hayes,et al.  A 20-year perspective on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. , 1993, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[5]  E Y Chao,et al.  Internal forces and moments in the femur during walking. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  R. Brand,et al.  Pelvic muscle and acetabular contact forces during gait. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Hai,et al.  Static and Dynamic Mechanics Analysis on Artificial Hip Joints with Different Interface Designs by the Finite Element Method , 2007 .

[8]  J. Perry,et al.  Gait Analysis , 2024 .

[9]  R. Brand,et al.  The sensitivity of muscle force predictions to changes in physiologic cross-sectional area. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Xiaojun Yu,et al.  An experimental study on the biomechanical properties of the cancellous bones of distal femur. , 2006, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[11]  A. Yettram,et al.  Stress and strain distribution within the intact femur: compression or bending? , 1996, Medical engineering & physics.

[12]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Georg N. Duda,et al.  Response to: "Stair climbing is more critical than walking in pre-clinical assessment of primary stability in cementless THA in vitro" [J. Biomech. 2005;38: 1143-1154] , 2006 .

[14]  A. Burstein,et al.  The elastic modulus for bone. , 1974, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  M. Heller,et al.  Stair climbing is more critical than walking in pre-clinical assessment of primary stability in cementless THA in vitro. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  Ugo Andreaus,et al.  MECHANICAL BEHAVIOUR OF A PROSTHESIZED HUMAN FEMUR: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN WALKING AND STAIR CLIMBING BY USING THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD , 2008 .