Hydrogen production by hydrogen sulfide splitting using concentrated solar energy – Thermodynamics and economic evaluation

Abstract Thermodynamic and economic analyses were carried out to evaluate the use of concentrated solar energy for driving the endothermic dissociation reaction H 2 S → H 2  + 0.5S 2 . Three different schemes were assessed: (1) a pure solar process; (2) a hybrid process, which uses both solar and natural gas combustion as the energy sources of high-temperature process heat; and (3) the Claus process. This study indicates that the pure solar process has the potential of lowering the disposal costs of H 2 S vis-a-vis the conventional Claus process while co-producing H 2 without concomitant CO 2 emissions. An economic assessment for a 40 MWth chemical plant using solar tower technology indicates savings of approximately 45% in comparison to the Claus process. Solar H 2 production is estimated at a cost in the range of 0.061–0.086 $/kW h, based on its lower heating value and without credit attributed to H 2 S disposal. A sensitivity analysis revealed that the quench efficiency represents the parameter with the highest impact on the economics of the process. A hybrid natural gas/solar plant design able to operate 24 h-a-day is predicted to reduce the H 2 production cost to 0.058 $/kW h at current fuel prices, however, at the expense of increased complexity related with the hybrid reactor design and operation plus the associated CO 2 emissions of 0.42 kg/kW h.

[1]  Anton Meier,et al.  Economic evaluation of the industrial solar production of lime , 2005 .

[2]  Manuel Romero,et al.  An Update on Solar Central Receiver Systems, Projects, and Technologies , 2002 .

[3]  V. Kaloidas,et al.  Kinetic studies on the catalytic decomposition of hydrogen sulfide in a tubular reactor , 1991 .

[5]  M. Dokiya,et al.  Catalytic Decomposition of Hydrogen Sulfide , 1978 .

[6]  John S. Eow,et al.  Recovery of Sulfur from Sour Acid Gas: A Review of the Technology , 2002 .

[7]  Akiba Segal,et al.  COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCES OF `TOWER-TOP' AND `TOWER-REFLECTOR' CENTRAL SOLAR RECEIVERS , 1999 .

[8]  A. Steinfeld,et al.  Economic evaluation of the solar thermalco-production of zinc and synthesis gas , 1998 .

[9]  Gregory J. Kolb,et al.  Heliostat Cost Reduction Study , 2007 .

[10]  High temperature solar thermochemical processing—hydrogen and sulfur from hydrogen sulfide , 1982 .

[11]  A. Steinfeld Solar thermochemical production of hydrogen--a review , 2005 .

[12]  Abraham Kribus,et al.  Solar tower reflector systems : A new approach for high-temperature solar plants , 1998 .

[13]  K. Karan,et al.  On reaction kinetics for the thermal decomposition of hydrogen sulfide , 1999 .

[14]  E. A. Fletcher,et al.  Hydrogen and sulfur from H2S-III. The economics of a quench process , 1985 .

[15]  C A Heaton an introduction to Industrial Chemistry , 1991 .

[16]  J. E. Noring,et al.  Hydrogen sulfide as a source of hydrogen , 1984 .

[17]  E. A. Fletcher,et al.  Hydrogen and sulfur from hydrogen sulfide—VI. Solar thermolysis , 1989 .

[18]  Roland Winston,et al.  High Collection Nonimaging Optics , 1989, Other Conferences.

[19]  E. A. Fletcher,et al.  Thermolysis of hydrogen sulfide in the temperature range 1350-1600 K , 1998 .