Effectiveness of emergency nurses' use of the Ottawa Ankle Rules to initiate radiographic tests on improving healthcare outcomes for patients with ankle injuries: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND The Ottawa Ankle Rules provide guidelines for clinicians on the recommendation of radiographic tests to verify fractures in patients with ankle injuries. The use of the Ottawa Ankle Rules by emergency nurses has been suggested to minimise unnecessary radiographic-test requests and reduce patients' length of stay in emergency departments. However, the findings of studies in this area are inconsistent. DESIGN A systematic review was conducted to synthesise the most accurate evidence available on the extent to which emergency nurses' use of the Ottawa Ankle Rules to initiate radiographic tests improves healthcare outcomes for patients with ankle injuries. DATA SOURCES The systematic review attempted to identify all relevant published and unpublished studies in English and Chinese from databases such as Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, ProQuest Health and Medical Complete, EBM Reviews, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL Plus, the British Nursing Index, Scopus, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China Journal Net, WanFang Data, the National Central Library Periodical Literature System, HyRead, the Digital Dissertation Consortium, MedNar and Google Scholar. REVIEW METHODS Two reviewers independently assessed the eligibility of all of the studies identified during the search, based on their titles and abstracts. If a study met the criteria for inclusion, or inconclusive information was available in its title and abstract, the full text was retrieved for further analysis. The methodological quality of all of the eligible studies was assessed independently by the two reviewers. RESULTS The search of databases and other sources yielded 1603 records. The eligibility of 17 full-text articles was assessed, and nine studies met the inclusion criteria. All nine studies were subjected to narrative analysis, and five were meta-analysed. All of the studies investigated the use of the refined Ottawa Ankle Rules. The results indicated that emergency nurses' use of the refined Ottawa Ankle Rules minimised unnecessary radiographic-test requests and reduced patients' length of stay in emergency departments. However, the use of these rules in urgent-care departments did not reduce unnecessary radiographic-test requests or patients' length of stay. The implementation of the refined Ottawa Ankle Rules by emergency nurses with different backgrounds, including nurse practitioners or general emergency nurses was found to reduce patients' length of stay in emergency departments. CONCLUSIONS The results of the systematic review suggested that a nurse-initiated radiographic test protocol should be introduced as standard practice in emergency departments.

[1]  D. Justham,et al.  Nurse practitioners and the Ottawa Ankle Rules: comparisons with medical staff in requesting X-rays for ankle injured patients. , 2000, Accident and emergency nursing.

[2]  J. Steurer,et al.  Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  Donna M Dryden,et al.  Accuracy of Ottawa Ankle Rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and midfoot in children: a meta-analysis. , 2009, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[4]  I. Stiell,et al.  A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. , 1992, Annals of emergency medicine.

[5]  L. Filiatrault,et al.  Effect of Triage Nurse Initiated Radiography Using the Ottawa Ankle Rules on Emergency Department Length of Stay at a Tertiary Centre. , 2016, CJEM.

[6]  N. Aslam,et al.  THE IMPACT OF IMPLEMENTING THE OTTAWA ANKLE RULES ON ANKLE RADIOGRAPHY REQUESTS IN A&E , 2003, International journal of clinical practice.

[7]  Jesse M Pines,et al.  International perspectives on emergency department crowding. , 2011, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[8]  David Ring,et al.  Incidence of Patients with Lower Extremity Injuries Presenting to US Emergency Departments by Anatomic Region, Disease Category, and Age , 2012, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  Li-Jung Liang,et al.  Effect of emergency department crowding on outcomes of admitted patients. , 2013, Annals of emergency medicine.

[10]  C. Mann,et al.  Use of the Ottawa ankle rules by nurse practitioners. , 1998, Journal of accident & emergency medicine.

[11]  E. D. L. de Lange-de Klerk,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility in the interpretation of Ottawa ankle and foot rules by specialized emergency nurses. , 2005, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[12]  G. Singh-Ranger,et al.  Comparison of current local practice and the Ottawa Ankle Rules to determine the need for radiography in acute ankle injury. , 1999, Accident and emergency nursing.

[13]  R. Niska,et al.  National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2007 emergency department summary. , 2010, National health statistics reports.

[14]  M. Clancy,et al.  Implementation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules by nurses working in an accident and emergency department. , 1997, Journal of accident & emergency medicine.

[15]  Mark Reardon,et al.  Decision Rules for the Use of Radiography in Acute Ankle Injuries Refinement and Prospective Validation , 1993 .

[16]  J. Richards,et al.  Overcrowding in the nation's emergency departments: complex causes and disturbing effects. , 2000, Annals of emergency medicine.

[17]  P. Richman,et al.  Can nurses appropriately interpret the Ottawa Ankle Rule , 2004 .

[18]  D G Altman,et al.  Concealing treatment allocation in randomised trials , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  R. Niska,et al.  National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 emergency department summary. , 2008, National health statistics reports.

[20]  C. Walsh-Kelly,et al.  Utilization of the Ottawa ankle rules by nurses in a pediatric emergency department. , 2002, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[21]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  I. Law,et al.  Nurse practitioners treating ankle and foot injuries using the Ottawa Ankle Rules: a comparative study in the emergency department. , 2013, Australasian emergency nursing journal : AENJ.

[23]  D. Justham,et al.  A case-control study of the transit times through an accident and emergency department of ankle injured patients assessed using the Ottawa Ankle Rules. , 2000, Accident and emergency nursing.

[24]  Jerome Fan,et al.  The effect of triage-applied Ottawa Ankle Rules on the length of stay in a Canadian urgent care department: a randomized controlled trial. , 2006, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[25]  Arthur L Kellermann,et al.  National trends in emergency department occupancy, 2001 to 2008: effect of inpatient admissions versus emergency department practice intensity. , 2012, Annals of emergency medicine.