Losing weight to save lives: A review of the role of automobile weight and size in traffic fatalities

Critics of higher fuel economy standards for vehicles have long argued that improving vehicle fuel economy will require reducing vehicle weight, and that would result in an increase in the number of fatalities from vehicle crashes. Several researchers have estimated that an across-the-board reduction of vehicle weight would reduce passenger safety (Evans 1991; Kahane 1997; U.S. GAO 1994). However, little research has been done on the relationship of vehicle size and fatality rates, independent of weight (see, however, Joksch, Massie, and Pichler 1998). In this report we review previous analyses of the relationship of vehicle weight and safety. We do this to study the opportunities to improve fuel economy in a more sophisticated way than across-the-board mass reduction. The aim is to explore improvements in traffic safety by making selected vehicle groups lighter, and retaining or enlarging selected vehicle dimensions. Unfortunately, the effects of size and mass have not been accurately separated in the crash fatality data, so some of our claims are only supported by general arguments from physics. In a follow-up report we will attempt to analyze crash fatality data to determine crash worthiness if the weight of certain vehicle groups would be decreased while maintaining or increasingmore » vehicle size. The first section of this report provides an introduction to fatal vehicle crashes in the United States. We summarize several trends in automotive crash statistics over the last 20 years. Then we discuss approaches analysts have taken in studying factors that affect ''exposure'', the likelihood of being involved in a serious crash. In Section 2 we discuss standardized crash tests and the basic physics of crashes. We review previous research on the effect of vehicle mass in two-vehicle crashes in Section 3. We also present new research on reductions in risk achieved by recent light vehicles. Section 4 presents previous estimates of the effect of reductions in vehicle mass and size on the number of fatalities overall. Section 5 presents our scenario for making light duty vehicles safer while improving fuel economy.« less

[1]  Ruprecht Sinnhuber,et al.  HOW SAFE CAN LIGHTWEIGHT CARS BE? AN ANALYTICAL STUDY OF THE LIMITS OF PASSIVE SAFETY , 1995 .

[2]  H. C. Joksch Fatality risks in collisions between cars and light trucks , 1998 .

[3]  C J Kahane,et al.  CORRELATION OF NCAP PERFORMANCE WITH FATALITY RISK IN ACTUAL HEAD-ON COLLISIONS. NHTSA TECHNICAL REPORT , 1994 .

[4]  Robert M Heavenrich,et al.  LIGHT-DUTY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY AND FUEL ECONOMY TRENDS THROUGH 1996. , 1988 .

[5]  Hideki Yonezawa,et al.  The Relationship Between Car Size and Occupant Injury in Traffic Accidents in Japan , 1997 .

[6]  David C. Viano,et al.  SAFETY OF A DOWNSIZED VEHICLE FLEET: EFFECTS OF MASS DISTRIBUTION, IMPACT SPEED AND INHERENT PROTECTION IN CAR-TO-CAR CRASHES , 1999 .

[7]  Adrian K. Lund,et al.  POTENTIAL STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING CRASH COMPATIBILITY IN THE U.S. VEHICLE FLEET , 1999 .

[8]  Xavier Trosseille,et al.  The Programmed Restraint System - A Lesson from Accidentology , 1997 .

[9]  Kennerly H. Digges,et al.  CRASH EXPOSURE AND CRASHWORTHINESS OF SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES. IN: OCCUPANT AND VEHICLE RESPONSES IN ROLLOVERS , 1999 .

[10]  E Hertz,et al.  THE EFFECT OF DECREASES IN VEHICLE WEIGHT ON INJURY CRASH RATES , 1997 .

[11]  D P Wood,et al.  Safety and the car size effect: a fundamental explanation. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  T D Gillespie,et al.  Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics , 1992 .

[13]  Joseph M. Nolan,et al.  Factors Contributing to Front-Side Compatibility: a Comparison of Crash Test Results , 1999 .

[14]  D Friedman,et al.  THE SAFE ROAD TO FUEL ECONOMY , 1991 .

[15]  Brian O'Neill,et al.  CRASH COMPATIBILITY ISSUE IN PERSPECTIVE , 2000 .

[16]  William T. Hollowell,et al.  The Aggressivity of Light Trucks and Vans in Traffic Crashes , 1998 .

[17]  Charles J. Kahane,et al.  The New Car Assessment Program - Historical Review and Effect , 1994 .

[18]  K L Campbell,et al.  Crash involvement rates by driver gender and the role of average annual mileage. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Peter Niederer,et al.  CRASHWORTHINESS AND COMPATIBILITY OF LOW MASS VEHICLES IN COLLISIONS , 1997 .

[20]  B O'Neill THE PHYSICS OF CAR CRASHES AND THE ROLE OF VEHICLE SIZE AND WEIGHT IN OCCUPANT PROTECTION , 1998 .

[21]  T M Klein,et al.  A STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF VEHICLE ROLLOVER PROPENSITY AND VEHICLE STABILITY. IN: OCCUPANT AND VEHICLE RESPONSES IN ROLLOVERS , 1992 .

[22]  L S Robertson Size, not mass, of car affects severity of injury in accidents. , 1993, American journal of public health.

[23]  M C Frick,et al.  Car size or car mass: which has greater influence on fatality risk? , 1992, American journal of public health.

[24]  C Tarriere,et al.  Accident research and experimental data useful for an understanding of the influence of car structural incompatibility on the risk of accident injury , 1995 .

[25]  J Broughton The theoretical basis for comparing the accident record of car models. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  Saad A. W. Jawad Compatibility study in frontal collisions - mass and stiffness ratio , 1998 .

[27]  D. Massie,et al.  Traffic accident involvement rates by driver age and gender. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.