Losing weight to save lives: A review of the role of automobile weight and size in traffic fatalities
暂无分享,去创建一个
Marc Ross | Tom Wenzel | M. Ross | T. Wenzel
[1] Ruprecht Sinnhuber,et al. HOW SAFE CAN LIGHTWEIGHT CARS BE? AN ANALYTICAL STUDY OF THE LIMITS OF PASSIVE SAFETY , 1995 .
[2] H. C. Joksch. Fatality risks in collisions between cars and light trucks , 1998 .
[3] C J Kahane,et al. CORRELATION OF NCAP PERFORMANCE WITH FATALITY RISK IN ACTUAL HEAD-ON COLLISIONS. NHTSA TECHNICAL REPORT , 1994 .
[4] Robert M Heavenrich,et al. LIGHT-DUTY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY AND FUEL ECONOMY TRENDS THROUGH 1996. , 1988 .
[5] Hideki Yonezawa,et al. The Relationship Between Car Size and Occupant Injury in Traffic Accidents in Japan , 1997 .
[6] David C. Viano,et al. SAFETY OF A DOWNSIZED VEHICLE FLEET: EFFECTS OF MASS DISTRIBUTION, IMPACT SPEED AND INHERENT PROTECTION IN CAR-TO-CAR CRASHES , 1999 .
[7] Adrian K. Lund,et al. POTENTIAL STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING CRASH COMPATIBILITY IN THE U.S. VEHICLE FLEET , 1999 .
[8] Xavier Trosseille,et al. The Programmed Restraint System - A Lesson from Accidentology , 1997 .
[9] Kennerly H. Digges,et al. CRASH EXPOSURE AND CRASHWORTHINESS OF SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES. IN: OCCUPANT AND VEHICLE RESPONSES IN ROLLOVERS , 1999 .
[10] E Hertz,et al. THE EFFECT OF DECREASES IN VEHICLE WEIGHT ON INJURY CRASH RATES , 1997 .
[11] D P Wood,et al. Safety and the car size effect: a fundamental explanation. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.
[12] T D Gillespie,et al. Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics , 1992 .
[13] Joseph M. Nolan,et al. Factors Contributing to Front-Side Compatibility: a Comparison of Crash Test Results , 1999 .
[14] D Friedman,et al. THE SAFE ROAD TO FUEL ECONOMY , 1991 .
[15] Brian O'Neill,et al. CRASH COMPATIBILITY ISSUE IN PERSPECTIVE , 2000 .
[16] William T. Hollowell,et al. The Aggressivity of Light Trucks and Vans in Traffic Crashes , 1998 .
[17] Charles J. Kahane,et al. The New Car Assessment Program - Historical Review and Effect , 1994 .
[18] K L Campbell,et al. Crash involvement rates by driver gender and the role of average annual mileage. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.
[19] Peter Niederer,et al. CRASHWORTHINESS AND COMPATIBILITY OF LOW MASS VEHICLES IN COLLISIONS , 1997 .
[20] B O'Neill. THE PHYSICS OF CAR CRASHES AND THE ROLE OF VEHICLE SIZE AND WEIGHT IN OCCUPANT PROTECTION , 1998 .
[21] T M Klein,et al. A STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF VEHICLE ROLLOVER PROPENSITY AND VEHICLE STABILITY. IN: OCCUPANT AND VEHICLE RESPONSES IN ROLLOVERS , 1992 .
[22] L S Robertson. Size, not mass, of car affects severity of injury in accidents. , 1993, American journal of public health.
[23] M C Frick,et al. Car size or car mass: which has greater influence on fatality risk? , 1992, American journal of public health.
[24] C Tarriere,et al. Accident research and experimental data useful for an understanding of the influence of car structural incompatibility on the risk of accident injury , 1995 .
[25] J Broughton. The theoretical basis for comparing the accident record of car models. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.
[26] Saad A. W. Jawad. Compatibility study in frontal collisions - mass and stiffness ratio , 1998 .
[27] D. Massie,et al. Traffic accident involvement rates by driver age and gender. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.