A Framework for the Next Generation of Risk Science

Objectives: In 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency initiated the NexGen project to develop a new paradigm for the next generation of risk science. Methods: The NexGen framework was built on three cornerstones: the availability of new data on toxicity pathways made possible by fundamental advances in basic biology and toxicological science, the incorporation of a population health perspective that recognizes that most adverse health outcomes involve multiple determinants, and a renewed focus on new risk assessment methodologies designed to better inform risk management decision making. Results: The NexGen framework has three phases. Phase I (objectives) focuses on problem formulation and scoping, taking into account the risk context and the range of available risk management decision-making options. Phase II (risk assessment) seeks to identify critical toxicity pathway perturbations using new toxicity testing tools and technologies, and to better characterize risks and uncertainties using advanced risk assessment methodologies. Phase III (risk management) involves the development of evidence-based population health risk management strategies of a regulatory, economic, advisory, community-based, or technological nature, using sound principles of risk management decision making. Conclusions: Analysis of a series of case study prototypes indicated that many aspects of the NexGen framework are already beginning to be adopted in practice. Citation: Krewski D, Westphal M, Andersen ME, Paoli GM, Chiu WA, Al-Zoughool M, Croteau MC, Burgoon LD, Cote I. 2014. A framework for the next generation of risk science. Environ Health Perspect 122:796–805; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307260

[1]  Nathaniel Rothman,et al.  Characterization of Changes in Gene Expression and Biochemical Pathways at Low Levels of Benzene Exposure , 2014, PloS one.

[2]  Fred A. Wright,et al.  Standardizing Benchmark Dose Calculations to Improve Science-Based Decisions in Human Health Assessments , 2014, Environmental health perspectives.

[3]  Division on Earth Toxicity testing for assessment of environmental agents , 2013 .

[4]  Weihsueh A Chiu,et al.  Approaches to advancing quantitative human health risk assessment of environmental chemicals in the post-genomic era. , 2013, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[5]  Melvin E. Andersen,et al.  Incorporating New Technologies Into Toxicity Testing and Risk Assessment: Moving From 21st Century Vision to a Data-Driven Framework , 2013, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[6]  Edward J. Perkins,et al.  Current Perspectives on the Use of Alternative Species in Human Health and Ecological Hazard Assessments , 2013, Environmental health perspectives.

[7]  Harvey J Clewell,et al.  Relative impact of incorporating pharmacokinetics on predicting in vivo hazard and mode of action from high-throughput in vitro toxicity assays. , 2013, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[8]  Xingming Zhao,et al.  Computational Systems Biology , 2013, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[9]  A. Butte,et al.  Systematic identification of interaction effects between genome- and environment-wide associations in type 2 diabetes mellitus , 2013, Human Genetics.

[10]  Robert J Kavlock,et al.  Incorporating biological, chemical, and toxicological knowledge into predictive models of toxicity. , 2012, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[11]  Melvin E. Andersen,et al.  Integrating pathway-based transcriptomic data into quantitative chemical risk assessment: a five chemical case study. , 2012, Mutation research.

[12]  Stephen W. Edwards,et al.  Advancing the Next Generation of Health Risk Assessment , 2012, Environmental health perspectives.

[13]  Michael B. Black,et al.  A comprehensive statistical analysis of predicting in vivo hazard using high-throughput in vitro screening. , 2012, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[14]  Dean P. Jones,et al.  Endoplasmic reticulum stress in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. , 2012, Annual review of nutrition.

[15]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Systems analysis of eleven rodent disease models reveals an inflammatome signature and key drivers , 2012, Molecular systems biology.

[16]  Kurt A Gust,et al.  A systems toxicology approach to elucidate the mechanisms involved in RDX species-specific sensitivity. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Alan E. Hubbard,et al.  Effect of Chemical Mutagens and Carcinogens on Gene Expression Profiles in Human TK6 Cells , 2012, PloS one.

[18]  Dan D. Petersen,et al.  Application of computational toxicological approaches in human health risk assessment. I. A tiered surrogate approach. , 2012, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[19]  Daniel Krewski,et al.  Expert vs. public perception of population health risks in Canada , 2012 .

[20]  David M. Reif,et al.  Update on EPA's ToxCast program: providing high throughput decision support tools for chemical risk management. , 2012, Chemical research in toxicology.

[21]  Ivan Rusyn,et al.  Predictive modeling of chemical hazard by integrating numerical descriptors of chemical structures and short-term toxicity assay data. , 2012, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[22]  David M. Reif,et al.  Zebrafish developmental screening of the ToxCast™ Phase I chemical library. , 2012, Reproductive toxicology.

[23]  Luoping Zhang,et al.  Current understanding of the mechanism of benzene-induced leukemia in humans: implications for risk assessment. , 2012, Carcinogenesis.

[24]  Thomas B Knudsen,et al.  Zebrafish: as an integrative model for twenty-first century toxicity testing. , 2011, Birth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews.

[25]  Daniel Krewski,et al.  Breast Cancer Risk in Relation to Alcohol Consumption and BRCA Gene Mutations – A Case‐Only Study of Gene‐Environment Interaction , 2011, The breast journal.

[26]  Daniel Krewski,et al.  A Signal-to-Noise Crossover Dose as the Point of Departure for Health Risk Assessment , 2011, Environmental health perspectives.

[27]  Melvin E. Andersen,et al.  New directions in toxicity testing. , 2011, Annual review of public health.

[28]  R. Judson,et al.  Estimating toxicity-related biological pathway altering doses for high-throughput chemical risk assessment. , 2011, Chemical research in toxicology.

[29]  K. Olden,et al.  Neighborhood-specific epigenome analysis: the pathway forward to understanding gene-environment interactions. , 2011, North Carolina medical journal.

[30]  Raghuraman Venkatapathy,et al.  Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the carcinogenic potency of chemicals. II. Using oral slope factor as a measure of carcinogenic potency. , 2011, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[31]  Russell S. Thomas,et al.  Application of transcriptional benchmark dose values in quantitative cancer and noncancer risk assessment. , 2011, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[32]  M. Hamburg,et al.  Advancing Regulatory Science , 2011, Science.

[33]  C. Pope,et al.  Radon and Lung Cancer in the American Cancer Society Cohort , 2011, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[34]  Kristin E. Porter,et al.  Global Gene Expression Profiling of a Population Exposed to a Range of Benzene Levels , 2010, Environmental health perspectives.

[35]  P. Anastas,et al.  Designing science in a crisis: the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  Robert J Kavlock,et al.  Incorporating human dosimetry and exposure into high-throughput in vitro toxicity screening. , 2010, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[37]  David M. Reif,et al.  Endocrine Profiling and Prioritization of Environmental Chemicals Using ToxCast Data , 2010, Environmental health perspectives.

[38]  D. Krewski,et al.  The vision of toxicity testing in the 21st century: moving from discussion to action. , 2010, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[39]  N. Rothman,et al.  Occupational trichloroethylene exposure and renal carcinoma risk: evidence of genetic susceptibility by reductive metabolism gene variants. , 2010, Cancer research.

[40]  David M. Reif,et al.  Analysis of eight oil spill dispersants using rapid, in vitro tests for endocrine and other biological activity. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[41]  Jonathan I Levy,et al.  Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[42]  Bas J Blaauboer,et al.  Biokinetic Modeling and in Vitro–in Vivo Extrapolations , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[43]  Lorenz R Rhomberg,et al.  Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: How will it Affect Risk Assessment? , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[44]  Melvin E Andersen,et al.  Computational Systems Biology and Dose-Response Modeling in Relation to New Directions in Toxicity Testing , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[45]  Melvin E. Andersen,et al.  The Future of Toxicity Testing , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[46]  S. Haddad,et al.  Physiologically Based Modeling of Pharmacokinetic Interactions in Chemical Mixtures , 2010 .

[47]  Benoît Schilter,et al.  In silico methods for physiologically based biokinetic models describing bioactivation and detoxification of coumarin and estragole: implications for risk assessment. , 2010, Molecular nutrition & food research.

[48]  Ruili Huang,et al.  Dose-Response Modeling of High-Throughput Screening Data , 2009, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[49]  Steven O Simmons,et al.  Cellular stress response pathway system as a sentinel ensemble in toxicological screening. , 2009, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[50]  D. Krewski,et al.  International Case Studies of Psychosocial Ripple Effects of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) in European Countries , 2009, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[51]  Sean M Hays,et al.  Using Biomonitoring Equivalents to interpret human biomonitoring data in a public health risk context , 2009, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[52]  D. Krewski,et al.  Public perception of population health risks in Canada: health hazards and health outcomes , 2009 .

[53]  Lyle D Burgoon,et al.  Automated quantitative dose-response modeling and point of departure determination for large toxicogenomic and high-throughput screening data sets. , 2008, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[54]  F. Collins,et al.  Transforming Environmental Health Protection , 2008, Science.

[55]  Daniel Krewski,et al.  An Integrated Framework for Risk Management and Population Health , 2007 .

[56]  Division on Earth Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy , 2007 .

[57]  George Loizou,et al.  Characterizing uncertainty and variability in physiologically based pharmacokinetic models: state of the science and needs for research and implementation. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[58]  D. Krewski,et al.  Public Perception of Population Health Risks in Canada: Health Hazards and Sources of Information , 2006 .

[59]  C. Wild Complementing the Genome with an “Exposome”: The Outstanding Challenge of Environmental Exposure Measurement in Molecular Epidemiology , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[60]  C. Dewa,et al.  An Introduction to Economic Evaluation: What's in a Name? , 2005, Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie.

[61]  T. Farley,et al.  Comparing the Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Prevention Interventions , 2004, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[62]  Daniel Krewski,et al.  Risk Management Frameworks for Human Health and Environmental Risks , 2003, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[63]  Division on Earth Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process , 1983 .

[64]  M. Markel THE FOOD ADDITIVES AMENDMENT OF 1958 , 2016 .

[65]  Morton Lippmann,et al.  Exposure science in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy , 2013, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[66]  Robert J Kavlock,et al.  Integration of dosimetry, exposure, and high-throughput screening data in chemical toxicity assessment. , 2012, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[67]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  Food for Thought ... on mapping the human toxome. , 2011, ALTEX.

[68]  S. Rappaport Implications of the exposome for exposure science , 2011, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[69]  Bas J Blaauboer,et al.  An expert consortium review of the EC-commissioned report "alternative (Non-Animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects - 2010". , 2011, ALTEX.

[70]  Harvey J Clewell,et al.  Can case study approaches speed implementation of the NRC report: "toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy?". , 2011, ALTEX.

[71]  Melvin E Andersen,et al.  A mechanistic redefinition of adverse effects - a key step in the toxicity testing paradigm shift. , 2010, ALTEX.

[72]  Steven K. Gibb Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. , 2008, Reproductive toxicology.

[73]  A. Amberg In Silico Methods , 2006 .

[74]  C. Ao,et al.  Indoor air purification by photocatalyst TiO2 immobilized on an activated carbon filter installed in an air cleaner , 2005 .

[75]  G L Stoddart,et al.  Producing health, consuming health care. , 1990, Social science & medicine.