An in-depth assessment of hybrid solar–geothermal power generation

Abstract A major problem faced by many standalone geothermal power plants, particularly in hot and arid climates such as Australia, is the adverse effects of diurnal temperature change on the operation of air-cooled condensers which typically leads to fluctuation in the power output and degradation of thermal efficiency. This study is concerned with the assessment of hybrid solar–geothermal power plants as a means of boosting the power output and where possible moderating the impact of diurnal temperature change. The ultimate goal is to explore the potential benefits from the synergies between the solar and geothermal energy sources. For this purpose the performances of the hybrid systems in terms of power output and the cost of electricity were compared with that of stand-alone solar and geothermal plants. Moreover, the influence of various controlling parameters including the ambient temperature, solar irradiance, geographical location, resource quality, and the operating mode of the power cycle on the performance of the hybrid system were investigated under steady-state conditions. Unsteady-state case studies were also performed to examine the dynamic behaviour of hybrid systems. These case studies were carried out for three different Australian geographic locations using raw hourly meteorological data of a typical year. The process simulation package Aspen-HYSYS was used to simulate plant configurations of interest. Thermodynamic analyses carried out for a reservoir temperature of 120 °C and a fixed brine flow rate of 50 kg/s revealed that under Australian climatic conditions (with a typical ambient temperature of 31 °C in summer) a hybrid plant would outperform stand-alone geothermal and solar power plants if at least 68% of its energy input is met by solar energy (i.e. a solar energy fraction of ≈68%). This figure drops to about 19% for reservoir temperatures greater than 170 °C. Case studies also showed that, for a mid-range reservoir temperature of 150 °C, the cost of electricity production can be reduced by 20% when a hybrid plant is used instead of the stand-alone Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS).

[1]  Craig Turchi,et al.  Water Use in Parabolic Trough Power Plants: Summary Results from WorleyParsons' Analyses , 2010 .

[2]  Behdad Moghtaderi,et al.  Figure of Merit Analysis of a Hybrid Solar-Geothermal Power Plant , 2013 .

[3]  Ronald DiPippo,et al.  Geothermal preheating in fossil-fired steam power plants , 1978 .

[4]  Giovanni Manente,et al.  Hybrid Solar-Geothermal Power Generation to Increase the Energy Production From a Binary Geothermal Plant , 2011 .

[5]  W. Beckman,et al.  Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes , 1985 .

[6]  A. Lentz,et al.  Parabolic troughs to increase the geothermal wells flow enthalpy , 2006 .

[7]  Mathieu Sellier,et al.  Efficiency improvement for geothermal power generation to meet summer peak demand , 2009 .

[8]  Ruggero Bertani,et al.  Geothermal power generation in the world 2005–2010 update report , 2012 .

[9]  P. N. Mathur Assessment of solar-geothermal hybrid system concepts , 1979 .

[10]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  Technical and economical analysis of a solar–geothermal hybrid plant based on an Organic Rankine Cycle , 2011 .

[11]  Tony Hill Australian Geothermal Implementing Agreement Annual Report - 2008 , 2009 .

[12]  John G Boghossian Dual-temperature Kalina cycle for geothermal-solar hybrid power systems , 2011 .

[13]  Marija S. Todorovic,et al.  Parametric Analysis and Thermodynamic Limits of Solar Assisted Geothermal Co- And Tri-Generation Systems , 2011 .

[14]  Rafael Almanza Salgado,et al.  Geothermal-solar hybrid system in order to increase the steam flow for geothermic cycle in Cerro Prieto, Mexico , 2003 .

[15]  A. Lentz,et al.  Solar–geothermal hybrid system , 2006 .

[16]  Timothy A. Moss,et al.  Final test results for the Schott HCE on a LS-2 collector. , 2005 .

[17]  Andrew David Greenhut Modeling and analysis of hybrid geothermal-solar thermal energy conversion systems , 2009 .

[18]  D. Kearney,et al.  Test results: SEGS LS-2 solar collector , 1994 .

[19]  C. Kutscher,et al.  Heat-Loss Testing of Solel's UVAC3 Parabolic Trough Receiver , 2008 .

[21]  L. Stoddard,et al.  Economic, Energy, and Environmental Benefits of Concentrating Solar Power in California , 2006 .