Thematic role properties of subjects and objects
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Edward Kako,et al. The semantics of syntactic frames , 2006 .
[2] HyangHee Kim,et al. Argument structure distribution of predicates in Korean agrammatic speech , 2003, Applied Psycholinguistics.
[3] Cynthia K Thompson,et al. Unaccusative verb production in agrammatic aphasia: the argument structure complexity hypothesis , 2003, Journal of Neurolinguistics.
[4] Cynthia L Fisher,et al. Structural limits on verb mapping: the role of abstract structure in 2.5‐year‐olds’ interpretations of novel verbs , 2002 .
[5] D. Gentner,et al. Structural alignment facilitates the noticing of differences , 2001, Memory & cognition.
[6] E. Kako,et al. The semantics of syntactic structures , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[7] Michael P. Kaschak,et al. Constructing Meaning: The Role of Affordances and Grammatical Constructions in Sentence Comprehension , 2000 .
[8] Gerry T. M. Altmann,et al. Thematic role assignment in context , 1999 .
[9] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension , 1998 .
[10] Dedre Gentner,et al. Alignment in the Processing of Metaphor , 1997 .
[11] Nicoletta Calzolari,et al. Automating the lexicon : research and practice in a multilingual environment , 1997 .
[12] C. Fisher. Structural Limits on Verb Mapping: The Role of Analogy in Children's Interpretations of Sentences , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.
[13] R. Jackendoff. The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in english , 1996 .
[14] Lila R. Gleitman,et al. Similar, and similar concepts , 1996, Cognition.
[15] J. Kegl,et al. Levels of Representation and Units of Access Relevant to Agrammatism , 1995, Brain and Language.
[16] I. M. Schlesinger,et al. Cognitive Space and Linguistic Case: Semantic and Syntactic Categories in English , 1995 .
[17] K. Heilman,et al. Spatial characteristics of thematic role representation , 1995, Neuropsychologia.
[18] A. Goldberg. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure , 1995 .
[19] R. Abelson. Statistics As Principled Argument , 1995 .
[20] B. Levin. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface , 1994 .
[21] Cynthia L Fisher,et al. Structure and meaning in the verb lexicon: Input for a syntax-aided verb learning procedure , 1994 .
[22] Susan M. Garnsey,et al. Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .
[23] S. Pinker. How could a child use verb syntax to learn verb semantics , 1994 .
[24] Heather K. J. van der Lely,et al. Canonical linking rules: forward versus reverse linking in normally developing and specifically language-impaired children , 1994, Cognition.
[25] E. Williams. Thematic structure in syntax , 1994 .
[26] Beth Levin,et al. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation , 1993 .
[27] Mark C. Baker. Thematic conditions on syntactic structures: evidence from locative applicatives , 1992 .
[28] T. Hoekstra,et al. Aspect and Theta Theory , 1992 .
[29] Ken Hale,et al. The syntactic character of thematic structure , 1992 .
[30] Malka Rappaport Hovav,et al. The lexical semantics of verbs of motion: the perspective from unaccusativity , 1992 .
[31] M. R. Manzini. Learnability and Cognition , 1991 .
[32] Michelle A. Hollander,et al. Affectedness and direct objects: The role of lexical semantics in the acquisition of verb argument structure , 1991, Cognition.
[33] J. Pustejovsky. The Generative Lexicon , 1991, CL.
[34] David R. Dowty. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .
[35] Joseph E. Emonds,et al. Subcategorization and syntax-based theta-role assignment , 1991 .
[36] Francesco Orilia,et al. Semantics and Cognition , 1991 .
[37] Letitia R. Naigles,et al. Children use syntax to learn verb meanings , 1990, Journal of Child Language.
[38] Van Valin,et al. Semantic Parameters of Split Intransitivity , 1990 .
[39] C. Pye. The acquisition of ergative languages , 1990 .
[40] L. Gleitman,et al. Language and Experience: Evidence from the Blind Child , 1988 .
[41] D. Slobin. The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition , 1987 .
[42] Luigi Burzio,et al. Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach , 1986 .
[43] Steven Pinker,et al. Language learnability and language development , 1985 .
[44] R. Burchfield. Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .
[45] Robert D. Van Valin,et al. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar , 1984 .
[46] H. Pick,et al. Spatial orientation : theory, research, and application , 1984 .
[47] Dedre Gentner,et al. Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy , 1983, Cogn. Sci..
[48] Eric Wanner,et al. Language acquisition: the state of the art , 1982 .
[49] S. Goldin-Meadow,et al. Experimental evidence for agent–patient categories in child language , 1982, Journal of Child Language.
[50] S. Thompson,et al. Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse , 1980 .
[51] Keith E. Nelson,et al. Children’s Language , 1980 .
[52] David M. Perlmutter. Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis , 1978 .
[53] C. Fillmore. The case for case reopened , 1977 .
[54] E. Rosch,et al. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.
[55] H. H. Clark,et al. The Semantics of Sentence Subjects , 1971, Language and speech.
[56] Emmon W. Bach,et al. Universals in Linguistic Theory , 1970 .
[57] Michael G. Johnson. Sytatic position and rated meaning , 1967 .
[58] Charles J. Fillmore. THE CASE FOR CASE. , 1967 .
[59] C. Osgood,et al. The Measurement of Meaning , 1958 .
[60] Roger S. Brown,et al. Linguistic determinism and the part of speech. , 1957, Journal of abnormal psychology.
[61] D. Gentner,et al. Structure mapping in the comparison process. , 2000, The American journal of psychology.
[62] Brian MacWhinney,et al. The emergence of language. , 1999 .
[63] Christiane Fellbaum,et al. Book Reviews: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database , 1999, CL.
[64] Edward Thomas Kako,et al. The event semantics of syntactic structures , 1998 .
[65] D. Gentner,et al. Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. , 1997 .
[66] Ingrid Kaufmann,et al. O- and D-Predicates: A Semantic Approach to the Unaccusative-Unergative Distinction , 1995, J. Semant..
[67] Ken Hale,et al. On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations , 1993 .
[68] M. Bowerman. Mapping thematic roles onto syntactic functions: are children helped by innate linking rules? , 1990 .
[69] R. Jackendoff. The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory , 1987 .
[70] Ralph L. Rosnow,et al. Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis , 1984 .
[71] G. Carlson. Thematic roles and their role in semantic interpretation , 1984 .
[72] W. Nelson Francis,et al. FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .
[73] Leonard Talmy,et al. How Language Structures Space , 1983 .
[74] Noam Chomsky,et al. Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .
[75] Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften,et al. The Child's construction of language , 1981 .
[76] M. Maratsos,et al. The internal language of children's syntax : The ontogenesis and representation of syntactic categories , 1980 .
[77] Jeffrey S. Gruber,et al. Lexical structures in syntax and semantics , 1976 .
[78] Ray Jackendoff,et al. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar , 1972 .