Traffic control and tillage strategies for harvesting and planting of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) in Australia

Two separate field trials were conducted at two sites; one trial determined the effect of matching crop row spacing and equipment track width on soil physical properties in the crop row and subsequent crop performance (Tully and Ingham, Qld, Australia). The second trial examined the effect of cultivating the old crop row only compared with cultivating the whole field on seedbed parameters for planting sugarcane (Feluga near Tully and Bundaberg, Qld, Australia). The trials were designed to test components of a potential new farming system for the sugar industry. The Australian sugar industry practices a form of controlled traffic in that harvesting traffic occurs in about the same position for up to four years. However, there is a mis-match between crop row spacing (1.5 m) and equipment track width (1.83 m). Single rows grown at 1.5 m spacing (random traffic, RT) were compared with dual rows (0.3 m between dual rows) grown at 1.8 m spacing (controlled traffic, CT). Soil bulk density and penetrometer resistance in the row was greater and saturated hydraulic conductivity was lower under the random traffic rows compared with the controlled traffic rows. Crop yields were variable, but tended to be greater under controlled traffic than random traffic conditions. It is thought that the benefits of controlled traffic in the sugar industry would increase with time. A field trial compared conventional land preparation with intensive cultivation and a 6–10 month bare fallow and three different types of reduced tillage. Treatments included mechanical stool removal with a 6–10 month bare fallow, chemically spraying the stool with a 6–10 month fallow period followed by cultivating the row prior to planting and mechanical stool removal and replanting with no fallow period. The crop was planted directly back into the previous crop row in all treatments. Reducing the number of cultivations did not compromise seedbed conditions, since similar aggregate size distributions were measured under all tillage strategies. Stalk counts and final yields indicated that crop response was not significantly (P < 0.05) affected by reducing the number of tillage operations. Soil fauna counts showed that there were higher numbers under reduced tillage compared with conventional cultivation. Our results indicate that controlled traffic and reduced tillage improves soil properties in the crop row compared with random traffic and conventional tillage as currently practiced, and we think that further improvement over time can be expected if controlled traffic and reduced tillage is continued. It is suggested that the combination of controlled traffic and reduced tillage could form the basis of a farming system for the Australian sugar industry to protect the soil resource and maintain long-term productivity.

[1]  M. V. Braunack,et al.  Changes in soil physical properties after one pass of a sugarcane haulout unit , 1999 .

[2]  Inge Håkansson,et al.  A method for characterizing the state of compactness of the plough layer , 1990 .

[3]  J. E. Morrison,et al.  Effects of controlled-traffic on soil physical properties and crop rooting , 1987 .

[4]  K. Bell,et al.  Reduced Tillage Increases Population Density of Soil Macrofauna in a Semiarid Environment in Central Queensland , 1999 .

[5]  Keith A. Smith,et al.  Soil and environmental analysis : physical methods , 2000 .

[6]  John Doe,et al.  Soil Map of the World , 1962 .

[7]  T. W. Green,et al.  Laboratory measurement of hydraulic conductivity. , 2002 .

[8]  Rattan Lai,et al.  Conservation Tillage for Sustainable Agriculture: Tropics Versus Temperate Environments , 1989 .

[9]  R. Lal Tillage systems in the tropics: management options and sustainability implications , 1995 .

[10]  A. R. Dexter,et al.  Soil aggregation in the seedbed: a review II. Effect of aggregate sizes on plant growth , 1989 .

[11]  Keith C. Cameron,et al.  Structural changes in a silt loam under long-term conventional or minimum tillage , 1993 .

[12]  S. Schrader,et al.  Tillage systems and soil compaction : their impact on abundance and vertical distribution of Enchytraeidae , 1998 .

[13]  M. Braunack,et al.  Effect of harvest traffic position on soil conditions and sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) response to environmental conditions in Queensland, Australia , 2006 .

[14]  R. Isbell Australian Soil Classification , 1996 .

[15]  J. Bauder,et al.  Effects of tillage with controlled wheel traffic on soil properties and root growth of corn , 1985 .

[16]  Neil McKenzie,et al.  Soil Physical Measurement and Interpretation for Land Evaluation , 2002 .

[17]  G. B. Simpson,et al.  The influence of tillage practices on soil macrofauna in a semi-arid agroecosystem in northeastern Australia , 1994 .

[18]  G. Spoor,et al.  Effect of soil macroporosity and aggregate size on seed-soil contact , 1996 .

[19]  R. A. Wesley,et al.  Response Of Soybean To Deep Tillage With Controlled Trafhc On Clay Soil , 1991 .

[20]  U. D. Perdok,et al.  Controlled traffic farming systems in the Netherlands , 1986 .

[21]  J. Pratley,et al.  Tillage : new directions in Australian agriculture , 1987 .

[22]  J. McPhee,et al.  Controlled traffic to increase productivity of irrigated row crops in the semi-arid tropics , 1995 .

[23]  A. Bengough,et al.  Penetrometer Techniques in Relation to Soil Compaction and Root Growth , 2000 .

[24]  J. R. Williford A controlled traffic cropping system for the mississippi delta , 1985 .