Between object and subject> multiple approaches to a prehistoric human-shaped pot from Romania

– The current paper aims to reveal the potential of combining multiple approaches (tech-no-functional analysis, experimental archaeology, and X-ray Computed Tomography) when it comes to studying unique earthenware artefacts, such as the prehistoric human-shaped pot discovered within the tell settlement from Sultana-Malu Ro s u (Romania), that belongs to the Kodjadermen-Gumel-ni t a-Karanovo VI civilization (KGK VI) which thrived during the 5 th millennium BC. This human-shaped pot, also known as ‘The Goddess of Sultana’, is an emblematic artefact that fascinates with its shape, gestures, and decoration. It was apparently made from a standard clay paste recipe and using basic forming techniques, with little care for the internal surface. This vessel also has several hidden cracks and some manipulation traces on its backside. In order to explore its relevance, our approach to this particular human-shaped pot included the use of archaeological data in correlation with other techniques in order to decipher the manufacturing process for such vessels, the possible way of using them, but also the meanings that they might have had for past human communities.

[1]  C. Lazăr,et al.  Multidisciplinary study on prehistoric pottery from Southeastern Romania , 2019, ArchéoSciences.

[2]  Gabriel Popescu,et al.  Looking beyond appearances: a multi-analytical approach on the prehistoric clay weights , 2019, Heritage Science.

[3]  Ki Suk Park,et al.  Application of Image Analysis for the Identification of Prehistoric Ceramic Production Technologies in the North Caucasus (Russia, Bronze/Iron Age) , 2019, Heritage.

[4]  Heiner Schwarzberg and Valeska Becker Bodies of Clay: On Prehistoric Humanised Pottery , 2019, Les Carnets de l'ACoSt.

[5]  K. Kotsakis,et al.  Inside out: Assessing pottery forming techniques with micro-CT scanning. An example from Middle Neolithic Thessaly , 2018, Journal of Archaeological Science.

[6]  C. Lazăr,et al.  Identifying the chaîne opératoire of prehistoric clay figurines using experimental archeology and imaging methods , 2018 .

[7]  H. Greenfield,et al.  A scanning method for the identification of pottery forming techniques at the mesoscopic scale: A pilot study in the manufacture of Early Bronze Age III holemouth jars and platters from Tell es-Safi/Gath , 2018 .

[8]  A. F. Greene,et al.  The digital radiography of archaeological pottery: Program and protocols for the analysis of production , 2017 .

[9]  Alice M. W. Hunt,et al.  The Oxford handbook of archaeological ceramic analysis , 2017 .

[10]  James M. Skibo Pottery Analysis: A Sourcebook , 2016, European Journal of Archaeology.

[11]  Richard Thér Identification of Pottery-Forming Techniques using Quantitative Analysis of the Orientation of Inclusions and Voids in Thin Sections , 2016 .

[12]  Cătălin Lazăr,et al.  Dogs, jaws, and other stories: Two symbolic objects made of dog mandibles from southeastern Europe , 2016 .

[13]  D. Bailey Figurines, Corporeality, and the Origins of The Gendered Body , 2014 .

[14]  V. Castellani The Lost World of Old Europe: The Danube Valley, 5000–2500 BC , 2013 .

[15]  James M. Skibo Understanding Pottery Function , 2012 .

[16]  Wolf-Achim Kahl,et al.  Non-destructive fabric analysis of prehistoric pottery using high-resolution X-ray microtomography: a pilot study on the late Mesolithic to Neolithic site Hamburg-Boberg , 2012 .

[17]  L. Meskell Goddesses, Gimbutas and New Age archaeology , 1995, Antiquity.

[18]  James M. Skibo,et al.  Organic-Tempered Pottery: An Experimental Study , 1989, American Antiquity.