Understanding complex signaling networks through models and metaphors.

Signaling networks are complex both in terms of the chemical and biophysical events that underlie them, and in the sheer number of interactions. Computer models are powerful tools to deal with both aspects of complexity, but their utility goes beyond simply replicating signaling events in silicon. Their great advantage is as a tool to understanding. The completeness of the description demanded by computer models highlights gaps in knowledge. The quantitative description in models facilitates a mapping between different kinds of analysis methods for complex systems. Systems analysis methods can highlight stable states of signaling networks and describe the transitions between them. Modeling also reveals functional similarities between signaling network properties and other well-understood systems such as electronic devices and neural networks. These suggest various metaphors as a tool to understanding. Based on such descriptions, it is possible to regard signaling networks as systems that decode complex inputs in time, space and chemistry into combinatorial output patterns of signaling activity. This would provide a natural interface to the combinatorial input patterns required by genetic circuits. Thus, a combination of computer modeling methods to capture the complexity and details, and useful abstractions revealed by these models, is necessary to achieve both rigorous description as well as human understanding.

[1]  W. J. Hedley,et al.  A short introduction to CellML , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[2]  Dennis Bray,et al.  Cell Movements: From Molecules to Motility , 1992 .

[3]  L. Glass,et al.  The logical analysis of continuous, non-linear biochemical control networks. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  T. Bartol,et al.  Monte Carlo Methods for Simulating Realistic Synaptic Microphysiology Using MCell , 2000 .

[5]  A. J,et al.  Cell Behaviour as a Dynamic Attractor in the Intracellular Signalling System , 1999 .

[6]  M. Karin,et al.  Mammalian MAP kinase signalling cascades , 2001, Nature.

[7]  Mark Hoebeke,et al.  SPiD: a subtilis protein interaction database , 2001, Bioinform..

[8]  Bard Ermentrout,et al.  Simulating, analyzing, and animating dynamical systems - a guide to XPPAUT for researchers and students , 2002, Software, environments, tools.

[9]  D. Schomburg,et al.  BRENDA: a resource for enzyme data and metabolic information. , 2002, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[10]  James B. Bassingthwaighte,et al.  Strategies for the Physiome Project , 2000, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  The ERATO Systems Biology Workbench: An Integrated Environment for Multiscale and Multitheoretic Simulations in Systems Biology , 2001 .

[12]  Paul Horowitz,et al.  The Art of Electronics , 1980 .

[13]  J. Hammer,et al.  Rabs grab motors: defining the connections between Rab GTPases and motor proteins. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[14]  U. Bhalla,et al.  Complexity in biological signaling systems. , 1999, Science.

[15]  William Holmes,et al.  Models of Calmodulin Trapping and CaM Kinase II Activation in a Dendritic Spine , 2004, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[16]  L. Loew,et al.  The Virtual Cell: a software environment for computational cell biology. , 2001, Trends in biotechnology.

[17]  H. McAdams,et al.  Circuit simulation of genetic networks. , 1995, Science.

[18]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN - The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd Edition , 1987 .

[19]  C. Sherr,et al.  Macrophage lineage switching of murine early pre-B lymphoid cells expressing transduced fms genes , 1990, Molecular and cellular biology.

[20]  R. Brent,et al.  Modelling cellular behaviour , 2001, Nature.

[21]  J. Hopfield,et al.  From molecular to modular cell biology , 1999, Nature.

[22]  Pier Paolo Di Fiore,et al.  The Eps8 protein coordinates EGF receptor signalling through Rac and trafficking through Rab5 , 2000, Nature.

[23]  Terry Gaasterland,et al.  The metabolic pathway collection from EMP: the enzymes and metabolic pathways database , 1996, Nucleic Acids Res..

[24]  T. Bliss,et al.  A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus , 1993, Nature.

[25]  J. Gurdon,et al.  Morphogen gradient interpretation , 2001, Nature.

[26]  D. Bray Protein molecules as computational elements in living cells , 1995, Nature.

[27]  E N Pugh,et al.  A quantitative account of the activation steps involved in phototransduction in amphibian photoreceptors. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  K. Kohn Molecular interaction map of the mammalian cell cycle control and DNA repair systems. , 1999, Molecular biology of the cell.

[29]  Frank Schacherer,et al.  The TRANSPATH signal transduction database: a knowledge base on signal transduction networks , 2001, Bioinform..

[30]  T. Doetschman,et al.  Interpretation of phenotype in genetically engineered mice. , 1999, Laboratory animal science.

[31]  U. Bhalla,et al.  Emergent properties of networks of biological signaling pathways. , 1999, Science.

[32]  D. Lauffenburger Cell signaling pathways as control modules: complexity for simplicity? , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Upinder S Bhalla,et al.  Mechanisms for temporal tuning and filtering by postsynaptic signaling pathways. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[34]  Y. Takai,et al.  Roles of postsynaptic density-95/synapse-associated protein 90 and its interacting proteins in the organization of synapses , 1999, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[35]  Ioannis Xenarios,et al.  DIP, the Database of Interacting Proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[36]  Masaru Tomita,et al.  E-CELL: software environment for whole-cell simulation , 1999, Bioinform..

[37]  D. Bray,et al.  Intracellular signalling as a parallel distributed process. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.

[38]  Upinder S. Bhalla,et al.  Biochemical Signaling Networks Decode Temporal Patterns of Synaptic Input , 2002, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[39]  E. Wimmer,et al.  MAP Kinase Phosphatase As a Locus of Flexibility in a Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Network , 2022 .

[40]  Gary D Bader,et al.  BIND--The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[41]  Paul De Koninck,et al.  Interaction with the NMDA receptor locks CaMKII in an active conformation , 2001, Nature.

[42]  Pier Paolo Di Fiore,et al.  The Eps 8 protein coordinates EGF receptor signalling through Rac and traf ® cking through Rab 5 , 2022 .

[43]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C. The art of scientific computing , 1987 .

[44]  G. Kane Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, vol 1: Foundations, vol 2: Psychological and Biological Models , 1994 .

[45]  Nikolay A. Kolchanov,et al.  GeneNet: a gene network database and its automated visualization , 1998, Bioinform..

[46]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage lambda-infected Escherichia coli cells. , 1998, Genetics.

[47]  Ray Paton Computing with biological metaphors , 1994 .

[48]  René Thomas,et al.  Developing a logical tool to analyse biological regulatory networks , 1994 .

[49]  H G Othmer,et al.  Simplification and analysis of models of calcium dynamics based on IP3-sensitive calcium channel kinetics. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[50]  D. Thieffry,et al.  A logical analysis of the Drosophila gap-gene system. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[51]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.

[52]  Erik De Schutter,et al.  Computational neuroscience : realistic modeling for experimentalists , 2000 .

[53]  Baier,et al.  Homogeneous and Spatio-temporal Chaos in Biochemical Reactions With Feedback Inhibition. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[54]  B. Aguda,et al.  A quantitative analysis of the kinetics of the G(2) DNA damage checkpoint system. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  Susumu Goto,et al.  The KEGG databases at GenomeNet , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[56]  Nicolas Le Novère,et al.  STOCHSIM: modelling of stochastic biomolecular processes , 2001, Bioinform..

[57]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[58]  Dennis Bray,et al.  Molecular model of a lattice of signalling proteins involved in bacterial chemotaxis , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[59]  Upinder S. Bhalla,et al.  The chemical organization of signaling interactions , 2002, Bioinform..

[60]  P. Uetz,et al.  Towards an understanding of complex protein networks. , 2001, Trends in cell biology.

[61]  Kathy Chen,et al.  Network dynamics and cell physiology , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[62]  J. Davie,et al.  Signal transduction pathways and the modification of chromatin structure. , 2001, Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology.