Artificial neural networks in accelerometer-based human activity recognition

This paper presents a study aimed to assess applicability of artificial neural networks (ANNs) in human activity recognition from simple features derived from accelerometric signals. Secondary goal was to select the most descriptive signal features and sensor locations to be used as inputs to ANNs. Five triaxial accelerometers were attached to human body in the following places: one at back, two at waist laterally and two at both ankles. The set of activities to be recognized was established to include the most often performed actions in home environment. In total 25 subjects performed a set of predefined actions like walking, going up and down the stairs, sitting down and standing up from a chair. Acquired signals were divided into 0.5s time windows by a label defining the action performed. Several statistical signal features were calculated and used to train ANNs. Learning and testing were performed on separate data sets. Analysis using Fisher Linear Discriminant showed that despite the fact that some of the calculated values play a significant role in the distinction between similar activities, none of the features or sensors could be omitted in the recognition of the activities considered in the study. Accuracy of 97% has been achieved for discriminating sitting and walking, 89% for standing, 72-75% for walking the stairs. Transient actions like standing up and sitting down have been detected with accuracy 56% and 38%, respectively. Even though there are studies declaring higher accuracy, none of them considered a set of activities analyzed in this research.

[1]  Pietro Siciliano,et al.  Supervised Expert System for Wearable MEMS Accelerometer-Based Fall Detector , 2013, J. Sensors.

[2]  L Quagliarella,et al.  An interactive fall and loss of consciousness detector system. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[3]  KR Westerterp,et al.  Physical inactivity as a determinant of the physical activity level in the elderly , 2001, International Journal of Obesity.

[4]  Andrzej W. Mitas,et al.  Activity Monitoring of the Elderly for Telecare Systems - Review , 2014 .

[5]  A K Bourke,et al.  Evaluation of waist-mounted tri-axial accelerometer based fall-detection algorithms during scripted and continuous unscripted activities. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  G M Lyons,et al.  A description of an accelerometer-based mobility monitoring technique. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[7]  Philippe Fraisse,et al.  Embedded system used for classifying motor activities of elderly and disabled people , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[8]  A K Bourke,et al.  Activity classification using a single chest mounted tri-axial accelerometer. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[9]  Jeen-Shing Wang,et al.  Using acceleration measurements for activity recognition: An effective learning algorithm for constructing neural classifiers , 2008, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[10]  M. Sekine,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of movement using the timed up-and-go test , 2008, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[11]  Merryn J Mathie,et al.  Accelerometry: providing an integrated, practical method for long-term, ambulatory monitoring of human movement , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[12]  J. B. J. Bussmann,et al.  Measuring daily behavior using ambulatory accelerometry: The Activity Monitor , 2001, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[13]  J. D. Janssen,et al.  A triaxial accelerometer and portable data processing unit for the assessment of daily physical activity , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Ling Bao,et al.  Activity Recognition from User-Annotated Acceleration Data , 2004, Pervasive.

[15]  Tae-Seong Kim,et al.  A Triaxial Accelerometer-Based Physical-Activity Recognition via Augmented-Signal Features and a Hierarchical Recognizer , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[16]  Eric Campo,et al.  Design and evaluation of a device worn for fall detection and localization: Application for the continuous monitoring of risks incurred by dependents in an Alzheimer's care unit , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Shuangquan Wang,et al.  FallAlarm: Smart Phone Based Fall Detecting and Positioning System , 2012, ANT/MobiWIS.

[18]  Jin Wang,et al.  Recognizing Human Daily Activities From Accelerometer Signal , 2011 .

[19]  Johannes Peltola,et al.  Activity classification using realistic data from wearable sensors , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[20]  Malcolm H Granat,et al.  Activity-monitor accuracy in measuring step number and cadence in community-dwelling older adults. , 2008, Journal of aging and physical activity.

[21]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Sensor Placement for Activity Detection Using Wearable Accelerometers , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Body Sensor Networks.

[22]  M Schmid,et al.  An adaptive Kalman-based Bayes estimation technique to classify locomotor activities in young and elderly adults through accelerometers. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[23]  G Plasqui,et al.  Improving assessment of daily energy expenditure by identifying types of physical activity with a single accelerometer. , 2009, Journal of applied physiology.

[24]  S. K. Tasoulis,et al.  Statistical data mining of streaming motion data for activity and fall recognition in assistive environments , 2013, Neurocomputing.

[25]  Robert W Motl,et al.  Does an accelerometer accurately measure steps taken under controlled conditions in adults with mild multiple sclerosis? , 2011, Disability and health journal.

[26]  P. Maj,et al.  Akcelerometryczny system badania i analizy chodu , 2012 .

[27]  Juan Zapata-Pérez,et al.  A system for ubiquitous fall monitoring at home via a wireless sensor network and a wearable mote , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[28]  Paul Lukowicz,et al.  Gesture spotting with body-worn inertial sensors to detect user activities , 2008, Pattern Recognit..

[29]  B. Dobkin,et al.  Reliability and Validity of Bilateral Ankle Accelerometer Algorithms for Activity Recognition and Walking Speed After Stroke , 2011, Stroke.

[30]  Catrine Tudor-Locke,et al.  Accelerometer-determined Steps/day In U.S. Children And Youth: 746 , 2010 .

[31]  John Staudenmayer,et al.  An artificial neural network to estimate physical activity energy expenditure and identify physical activity type from an accelerometer. , 2009, Journal of applied physiology.

[32]  Nigel H. Lovell,et al.  Implementation of a real-time human movement classifier using a triaxial accelerometer for ambulatory monitoring , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[33]  Pawel Badura,et al.  Acceleration trajectory analysis in remote gait monitoring , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[34]  Michael L. Littman,et al.  Activity Recognition from Accelerometer Data , 2005, AAAI.

[35]  J F Sallis,et al.  The effects of a 2-year physical education program (SPARK) on physical activity and fitness in elementary school students. Sports, Play and Active Recreation for Kids. , 1997, American journal of public health.

[36]  M. N. Nyan,et al.  Classification of gait patterns in the time-frequency domain. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  Willem van Mechelen,et al.  Disagreement in physical activity assessed by accelerometer and self-report in subgroups of age, gender, education and weight status , 2009, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[38]  D.A. James,et al.  An accelerometer based sensor platform for insitu elite athlete performance analysis , 2004, Proceedings of IEEE Sensors, 2004..

[39]  C. Tudor-Locke,et al.  Accelerometer-determined steps/day and metabolic syndrome. , 2010, American journal of preventive medicine.