Preoperative predicting malignancy in breast mass-like lesions: value of adding histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for improving confidence level.

OBJECTIVE This study aims to find out the benefits of adding histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps onto dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in predicting breast malignancy. METHODS This study included 95 patients who were found with breast mass-like lesions from January 2014 to March 2016 (47 benign and 48 malignant). These patients were estimated by both DCE-MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and classified into two groups, namely, the benign and the malignant. Between these groups, the DCE-MRI parameters, including morphology, enhancement homogeneity, maximum slope of increase (MSI) and time-signal intensity curve (TIC) type, as well as histogram parameters generated from ADC maps were compared. Then, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the most valuable variables in predicting malignancy. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were taken to assess their clinical values. RESULTS The lesion morphology, MSI and TIC Type (p < 0.05) were significantly different between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that irregular morphology, TIC Type II/III and ADC10 were important predictors for breast malignancy. Increased area under curve (AUC) and specificity can be achieved with Model 2 (irregular morphology + TIC Type II/III + ADC10 < 1.047 ×10-3 mm2 s-1) as the criterion than Model 1 (irregular morphology + TIC Type II/III) only (Model 2 vs Model 1; AUC, 0.822 vs 0.705; sensitivity, 68.8 vs 75.0%; specificity, 95.7 vs 66.0%). CONCLUSION Irregular morphology, TIC Type II/III and ADC10 are indicators for predicting breast malignancy. Histogram analysis of ADC maps can provide additional value in predicting breast malignancy. Advances in knowledge: The morphology, MSI and TIC types in DCE-MRI examination have significant difference between the benign and malignant groups. A higher AUC can be achieved by using ADC10 as the diagnostic index than other ADC parameters, and the difference in AUC based on ADC10 and ADCmean was statistically significant. The irregular morphology, TIC Type II/III and ADC10 were significant predictors for malignant lesions.

[1]  F. Takayama,et al.  MRI of the breast: comparison of MRI signals and histological characteristics of the same slices , 2005, Medical Molecular Morphology.

[2]  F. Akiyama,et al.  Therapeutic strategies for breast cancer based on histological type , 2009, Breast cancer.

[3]  M. I. Rosa,et al.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance in suspicious breast lesions: a systematic quantitative review and meta-analysis , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[4]  Seung Hong Choi,et al.  Gliomas: Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps with standard- or high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging--correlation with tumor grade. , 2011, Radiology.

[5]  K. Ogasawara,et al.  Combination of Preoperative Cerebral Blood Flow and 123I-Iomazenil SPECT Imaging Predicts Postoperative Cognitive Improvement in Patients Undergoing Uncomplicated Endarterectomy for Unilateral Carotid Stenosis , 2012, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[6]  Bal Sanghera,et al.  Assessment of tumor heterogeneity: an emerging imaging tool for clinical practice? , 2012, Insights into Imaging.

[7]  H. Kawai,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast masses: comparison of diagnostic performance using various apparent diffusion coefficient parameters. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Vicky Goh,et al.  Assessment of tumor heterogeneity by CT texture analysis: can the largest cross-sectional area be used as an alternative to whole tumor analysis? , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[9]  G S Karczmar,et al.  Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters of breast lesions at 1.5 and 3.0 T: a pilot study. , 2015, The British journal of radiology.

[10]  T. Helbich,et al.  Multiparametric MR Imaging with High-Resolution Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion-weighted Imaging at 7 T Improves the Assessment of Breast Tumors: A Feasibility Study. , 2015, Radiology.

[11]  C. Decaestecker,et al.  Microsatellite instable vs stable colon carcinomas: analysis of tumour heterogeneity, inflammation and angiogenesis , 2015, British Journal of Cancer.

[12]  M. Zeng,et al.  Potential of MR histogram analyses for prediction of response to chemotherapy in patients with colorectal hepatic metastases , 2016, European Radiology.

[13]  J. Makki,et al.  Diversity of Breast Carcinoma: Histological Subtypes and Clinical Relevance , 2015, Clinical medicine insights. Pathology.

[14]  Man Chen,et al.  Three-dimensional Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Response Assessment for Breast Cancer: A Comparison with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pathology , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[15]  Nicola Schieda,et al.  Whole-Tumor Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram and Texture Analysis to Predict Gleason Score Upgrading in Intermediate-Risk 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer. , 2016, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  M. Könönen,et al.  Incidentally detected enhancing lesions found in breast MRI: analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient and T2 signal intensity significantly improves specificity , 2016, European Radiology.

[17]  K. Gelmon,et al.  Palbociclib and Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  T. Bathen,et al.  A Simplified Approach to Measure the Effect of the Microvasculature in Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging Applied to Breast Tumors: Preliminary Results. , 2016, Radiology.

[19]  S. Suo,et al.  Characterization of breast masses as benign or malignant at 3.0T MRI with whole‐lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient , 2016, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  Christoph I. Lee,et al.  Performance of DWI as a Rapid Unenhanced Technique for Detecting Mammographically Occult Breast Cancer in Elevated-Risk Women With Dense Breasts. , 2016, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  Linda Moy,et al.  Separation of benign and malignant breast lesions using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in a biopsy cohort , 2017, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  E. Demirci,et al.  Is the necrosis/wall ADC ratio useful for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions? , 2017, The British journal of radiology.

[23]  Sung Hun Kim,et al.  Differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions: Added value of the qualitative analysis of breast lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging at 3.0 T , 2017, PloS one.

[24]  Pantelis A Asvestas,et al.  Computer-based automated estimation of breast vascularity and correlation with breast cancer in DCE-MRI images. , 2017, Magnetic resonance imaging.