Covert orienting within peripersonal and extrapersonal space: young adults.

Covert orienting within peripersonal (near) and extrapersonal (far) space was investigated in a large sample of young adults. The participants made speeded responses to targets in a simple, go/no-go detection task. Stimuli, equated for eccentricity and size, were presented at two distinct distances from the observer, representing peripersonal space and extrapersonal space. Within each distance condition cues and targets were presented at the four corners of an imaginary square allowing assessment of the influence of attention upon targets presented in the upper and lower as well as left and right visual fields. In the neutral condition lower field targets had a small advantage over upper field targets. This effect was also observed under cued conditions. When presented in peripersonal space, near targets benefited more from valid cuing than did targets in the other conditions. This pattern is discussed in terms of Previc's [Behav. Brain Sci. 13 (1990) 519] model of visual field specialization.

[1]  S. Petersen,et al.  Influences of lesions of parietal cortex on visual spatial attention in humans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neural Circuits for Spatial Attention and Unilateral Neglect , 1987 .

[3]  F. Previc.  The neuropsychology of 3-D space. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. I. Somatosensory responses , 1981, Behavioural Brain Research.

[5]  A. Berti,et al.  When Far Becomes Near: Remapping of Space by Tool Use , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  J. Jonides,et al.  On the Cost and Benefit of Cost and Benefit , 1984 .

[8]  K. Zilles,et al.  Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: a physiological basis for clinical dissociations. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  Mark E. McCourt,et al.  Asymmetries of Visuospatial Attention are Modulated by Viewing Distance and Visual Field Elevation: Pseudoneglect in Peripersonal and Extrapersonal Space , 2000, Cortex.

[10]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Movements of attention in the three spatial dimensions and the meaning of “neutral” cues , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  F. Ferlazzo,et al.  Functional Representation of 3d Space in Endogenous Attention Shifts , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  K. Heilman,et al.  Neglect of near peripersonal space. Evidence for multidirectional attentional systems in humans. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  C. Umilta,et al.  Shifting visuo-spatial attention in a virtual three-dimensional space. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[14]  J. Marshall,et al.  Is neglect (only) lateral? A quadrant analysis of line cancellation. , 1989, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[15]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Handbook of Neuropsychology , 1991 .

[16]  K M Heilman,et al.  Peripersonal and vertical neglect. , 1990, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  R Klein,et al.  The spatial distribution of attention during covert visual orienting. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[18]  E. Làdavas.  Functional and dynamic properties of visual peripersonal space , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. II. Visual responses , 1981, Behavioural Brain Research.

[20]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  F. Previc.  Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[22]  Helene Intraub,et al.  Vertical biases in scene memory , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  I..  THE ATTENTION SYSTEM OF THE HUMAN BRAIN , 2002 .