Inter-organizational fit and environmental innovation in supply chains: A configuration approach

Purpose Through examining the two constructs of inter-organizational complementarity and inter-organizational compatibility in supply chains, the purpose of this paper is to develop a taxonomy of focal firms’ inter-organizational fit (IOF) configurations with their suppliers and customers, and examine the relationship between these configurations and environmental innovation (EI) in order to answer the question of “with whom” to collaborate for EI development. Design/methodology/approach A survey instrument was elaborated and data from a sample of 171 US firms were collected. The authors adopted cluster analysis to identify the IOF taxonomy. Canonical discriminant analysis was employed to uncover underlying dimensions between clustering variables and cluster membership. Then, ANOVA tests were conducted to investigate relationships between IOF configurations in the context of EI in supply chains. Findings Three configurations were identified based on the complementarity and compatibility between focal firms and their supply chain partners. It is observed that the overall IOF level is positively related to firms’ EI outcomes. Moreover, inter-organizational complementarity facilitates incremental EI while inter-organizational compatibility plays a more crucial role in radical EI. Both are required to achieve the best innovation outcome. Originality/value This research develops the first taxonomy for depicting IOF in a supply chain innovation context and also clarifies different rationale behind the development of incremental and radical EI through examining distinctive effects of the complementarity and compatibility with supply chain partners.

[1]  J. Barney.  Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[2]  Deepak K. Datta,et al.  Effectiveness and Efficiency of Cross-Border Knowledge Transfer: An Empirical Examination , 2008 .

[3]  H. Chan,et al.  The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan , 2011 .

[4]  Jeremy Hall,et al.  Innovation dynamics and environmental technologies: the emergence of fuel cell technology , 2003 .

[5]  Premaratne Samaranayake,et al.  A conceptual framework for supply chain management: a structural integration , 2005 .

[6]  D. Lehmann.  Market research and analysis , 1979 .

[7]  S. Seuring,et al.  Sustainable supply chain management and inter-organizational resources: a literature review , 2009 .

[8]  A. Campbell,et al.  Corporate strategy: The quest for parenting advantage , 1995 .

[9]  O. Tang,et al.  Supply chain collaboration for sustainability: A literature review and future research agenda , 2017 .

[10]  J. Mentzer,et al.  Does relationship learning lead to relationship value? A cross-national supply chain investigation , 2010 .

[11]  Ping-Chuan Chen,et al.  Collaborative green innovation in emerging countries: a social capital perspective , 2014 .

[12]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[13]  Tareq Emtairah,et al.  Industrial symbiosis networks and the contribution to environmental innovation: The case of the Landskrona industrial symbiosis programme , 2005 .

[14]  Chee-Chuong Sum,et al.  A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies in China , 2006 .

[15]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach , 2010 .

[16]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Green and Competitive : Ending the Stalemate , 1996 .

[17]  A. Moreira,et al.  The influence of supply chain on the innovation process: a systematic literature review , 2016 .

[18]  C. K. Prahalad,et al.  THE DOMINANT LOGIC: RETROSPECTIVE AND EXTENSION , 1995 .

[19]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  The dark side of alliances:: Lessons from Volvo–Renault , 1998 .

[20]  David E. Cantor,et al.  How Environmental Management Competitive Pressure Affects a Focal Firm's Environmental Innovation Activities: A Green Supply Chain Perspective , 2015 .

[21]  L. Biggiero,et al.  Heterogeneity and Specificity of Inter-Firm Knowledge Flows in Innovation Networks , 2008 .

[22]  D. Lambert,et al.  Issues in Supply Chain Management , 2000 .

[23]  Michael J. Brusco,et al.  Cluster analysis in empirical OM research: survey and recommendations , 2017 .

[24]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances , 2001 .

[25]  Todd Saxton,et al.  The Effects of Partner and Relationship Characteristics On Alliance Outcomes , 1997 .

[26]  A. Tsui,et al.  Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[27]  V. Marchi.  ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND R&D COOPERATION: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM SPANISH MANUFACTURING FIRMS , 2012 .

[28]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[29]  Richard J. Fairchild,et al.  Customer, regulatory, and competitive pressure as drivers of environmental innovation , 2011 .

[30]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supply‐chain linkages and operational performance: A resource‐based‐view perspective , 2003 .

[31]  Arvind Parkhe.  Interfirm Diversity, Organizational Learning, and Longevity in Global Strategic Alliances , 1991 .

[32]  Gregory Theyel.  Management practices for environmental innovation and performance , 2000 .

[33]  C. Giménez,et al.  Cooperative initiatives with NGOs in socially sustainable supply chains: How is inter-organizational fit achieved? , 2016 .

[34]  S. Lippman,et al.  Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition , 1982 .

[35]  Cristina Giménez Thomsen,et al.  NGOs’ Initiatives to Enhance Social Sustainability in the Supply Chain: Poverty Alleviation Through Supplier Development Programs , 2016 .

[36]  A. Roth,et al.  A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies , 1994 .

[37]  Marcus A. Bellamy,et al.  The influence of supply network structure on firm innovation , 2014 .

[38]  R. Richey,et al.  Technology and Flexibility: Enablers of Collaboration and Time-Based Logistics Quality , 2012 .

[39]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities , 1998 .

[40]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[41]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[42]  Frank L. Montabon,et al.  An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance , 2007 .

[43]  Mohammad Moshtari.  Inter‐Organizational Fit, Relationship Management Capability, and Collaborative Performance within a Humanitarian Setting , 2016 .

[44]  Sandy D. Jap.  Pie-Expansion Efforts: Collaboration Processes in Buyer–Supplier Relationships , 1999 .

[45]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[46]  Preet S. Aulakh,et al.  The influence of complementarity, compatibility, and relationship capital on alliance performance , 2001 .

[47]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  New Venture Partnering Capability: An Empirical Investigation into How Buying Firms Effectively Leverage the Potential of Innovative New Ventures , 2016 .

[48]  D. Cantor,et al.  The competitive determinants of a firm's environmental management activities: Evidence from US manufacturing industries , 2012 .

[49]  J. Li,et al.  Product co-development in an emerging market: the role of buyer-supplier compatibility and institutional environment , 2016 .

[50]  Nicolò Barbieri,et al.  A Survey of the Literature on Environmental Innovation Based on Main Path Analysis , 2016 .

[51]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures , 2001 .

[52]  D. Pujari.  Eco-innovation and new product development: understanding the influences on market performance , 2006 .

[53]  Alison Ashby,et al.  Making connections: a review of supply chain management and sustainability literature , 2012 .

[54]  Sandra Rothenberg,et al.  Suppliers and Environmental Innovation: The Automotive Paint Process , 2000 .

[55]  R. Klassen,et al.  Environmental management and manufacturing performance: The role of collaboration in the supply chain , 2008 .

[56]  Peter M. Ralston,et al.  A Structure-Conduct-Performance Perspective of How Strategic Supply Chain Integration Affects Firm Performance , 2014 .

[57]  K. Rennings.  Redefining innovation -- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics , 2000 .

[58]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Resources, Transactions and Rents: Managing Value Through Interfirm Collaborative Relationships , 1998 .

[59]  Woodrow W. Clark,et al.  Special Issue: Environmental innovation , 2003 .

[60]  D. Dillman.  Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[61]  César Camisón-Zornoza,et al.  A Meta-analysis of Innovation and Organizational Size , 2004 .

[62]  K. Verghese,et al.  Environmental innovation in industrial packaging: a supply chain approach , 2007 .

[63]  Desirée Knoppen,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY IN BUYER-SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE OF ITS MEDIATING ROLE , 2014 .

[64]  Vivian W. Y. Tam,et al.  Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China , 2014 .

[65]  Yuan Li,et al.  Transformational offshore outsourcing: Empirical evidence from alliances in China , 2008 .

[66]  F. Selnes,et al.  Promoting Relationship Learning , 2003 .

[67]  Yu-Shan Chen,et al.  Origins of green innovations: the differences between proactive and reactive green innovations , 2012 .

[68]  Mohd Rizaimy Shaharudin,et al.  Green innovation adoption in automotive supply chain: the Malaysian case , 2015 .

[69]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[70]  Jasmine Siu Lee Lam,et al.  Sharing environmental management information with supply chain partners and the performance contingencies on environmental munificence , 2015 .

[71]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  Social capital configuration, legal bonds and performance in buyer–supplier relationships , 2011 .

[72]  J. Wacker,et al.  A transaction cost economics model for estimating performance effectiveness of relational and contractual governance , 2016 .

[73]  V. Kannan,et al.  Linkages between firm innovation strategy, suppliers, product innovation, and business performance: Insights from resource dependence theory , 2017 .

[74]  Stephan Vachon,et al.  Supply chain management and environmental technologies: the role of integration , 2007 .

[75]  R. Klassen,et al.  EXTENDING GREEN PRACTICES ACROSS THE SUPPLY CHAIN: THE IMPACT OF UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM INTEGRATION , 2006 .

[76]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review , 2002 .

[77]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Inter- and Intra-Organizational Knowledge Transfer: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of its Antecedents and Consequences , 2008 .

[78]  José Carlos Tiomatsu Oyadomari,et al.  Does the competitive orientation really lead to emphasis on different internal capabilities , 2015 .

[79]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .