Effect of Channel Envelope Synchrony on Interaural Time Difference Sensitivity in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners

Objectives: For a periodic acoustic input signal, the channel envelopes coded by current bilateral cochlear implant sound processors can be asynchronous. The effect of this asynchrony on sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs) was assessed. Design: ITD sensitivity was measured in six bilateral cochlear implant listeners for single- and three-electrode stimuli. The three-electrode stimuli contained envelope modulations, either synchronous or asynchronous across electrodes, with delays of 1.25 up to 5.00 ms. Each individual electrode carried the same ITD. Either neighboring electrodes were chosen or a separation of four electrodes to investigate the effect of electrode distance. Results: With synchronous envelopes, no difference in ITD sensitivity was found among single-electrode, adjacent three-electrode, and spaced three-electrode stimuli. A decrease in ITD sensitivity was found with increasing across-channel envelope asynchrony, which was consistent with the use of the across-electrode aggregate stimulation pattern rather than individual information channels for ITDs. No consistent effect of electrode separation was found. Conclusions: While the binaural system was resilient to small delays between envelopes, larger delays significantly deceased ITD sensitivity, both for adjacent and further spaced electrodes.

[1]  R. Tyler,et al.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  R. Litovsky,et al.  Interaural Time-Delay Sensitivity in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Pulse Rate, Modulation Rate, and Place of Stimulation , 2009, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[3]  Bernhard U. Seeber,et al.  Localization in Reverberation with Cochlear Implants , 2013, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[4]  Robert H. Pierzycki,et al.  Comodulation Masking Release In Electric Hearing , 2014, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[5]  Erin C. Schafer,et al.  A meta-analysis to compare speech recognition in noise with bilateral cochlear implants and bimodal stimulation , 2011, International journal of audiology.

[6]  Monita Chatterjee,et al.  Across- and Within-Channel Envelope Interactions in Cochlear Implant Listeners , 2004, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[7]  Jan Wouters,et al.  APEX 3: a multi-purpose test platform for auditory psychophysical experiments , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[8]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Interaural temporal discrimination using two sinusoidally amplitude-modulated, high-frequency tones: conditions of summation and interference. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Robert F Labadie,et al.  Interaural Time and Level Difference Thresholds for Acoustically Presented Signals in Post-Lingually Deafened Adults Fitted with Bilateral Cochlear Implants Using CIS+ Processing , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[10]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Lateralization of low-frequency tones: relative potency of gating and ongoing interaural delays. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Becky B. Poon,et al.  Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: Development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Leslie R Bernstein,et al.  Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using "transposed stimuli". , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  R. Carlyon,et al.  Temporal pitch percepts elicited by dual-channel stimulation of a cochlear implant. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Bernhard Laback,et al.  Sensitivity to Interaural Level and Envelope Time Differences of Two Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners Using Clinical Sound Processors , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[16]  Piotr Majdak,et al.  Effects of envelope shape on interaural envelope delay sensitivity in acoustic and electric hearing. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Alan Kan,et al.  Across-frequency combination of interaural time difference in bilateral cochlear implant listeners , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[18]  R. Dye,et al.  The combination of interaural information across frequencies: lateralization on the basis of interaural delay. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Hugh J. McDermott,et al.  The perceptual effects of current pulse duration in electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  R. V. van Hoesel,et al.  Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Ruth Y Litovsky,et al.  Effect of age at onset of deafness on binaural sensitivity in electric hearing in humans. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  H. Dillon,et al.  Binaural-Bimodal Fitting or Bilateral Implantation for Managing Severe to Profound Deafness: A Review , 2007, Trends in amplification.

[23]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Modulation Enhancement in the Electrical Signal Improves Perception of Interaural Time Differences with Bimodal Stimulation , 2014, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[24]  H J McDermott,et al.  The perception of temporal patterns for electrical stimulation presented at one or two intracochlear sites. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  G M Clark,et al.  Loudness summation, masking, and temporal interaction for sensations produced by electric stimulation of two sites in the human cochlea. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  M. Kompis,et al.  Minimum Audible Angle, Just Noticeable Interaural Differences and Speech Intelligibility with Bilateral Cochlear Implants Using Clinical Speech Processors , 2005, Audiology and Neurotology.

[27]  Virginia Best,et al.  Binaural interference in bilateral cochlear-implant listeners. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Interference in detection of interaural delay in a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tone produced by a second, spectrally remote sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tone. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  W. Baumgartner,et al.  Effects of interaural time differences in fine structure and envelope on lateral discrimination in electric hearing. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  B. Seeber,et al.  Localization cues with bilateral cochlear implants. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  D. Eddington,et al.  Sensitivity of bilateral cochlear implant users to fine-structure and envelope interaural time differences. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.