Mechanical properties and water absorption of surface modified ABS 3D printed by fused deposition modelling

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of a sealing protective treatment on the water absorption and mechanical properties of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)-printed parts by fused deposition modelling. Protective products include aqueous acetone solutions with different concentrations, polyurethane wood sealer and aqueous acrylic-based varnish. Design/methodology/approach Open porosity was estimated by the absorption coefficient and the total amount of water retained, obtained from water absorption tests. Mechanical characterization was performed by compressive and tensile tests. Different specimens with different build directions and raster angles were used. Findings The treatments with acetone solutions were not effective in reducing the porosity of ABS parts, as the amount of acetone that reduces effectively the porosity will also affect the sample dimensional stability. The polyurethane treatment was found to reduce the absorption coefficient, but the maximum water content and the open porosity remain almost unchanged in comparison with the ones obtained for untreated specimens. The treatment with an acrylic-based varnish was found to preserve the dimensional stability of the specimens, to reduce the open porosity and to maintain the compression and tension properties of the specimens in different build directions and raster angles. Originality/value Surface modification for water tight applications of ABS 3D printing parts enables new designs where both sealing and the preservation of mechanical properties are important. As per the knowledge of the authors, the water absorption and the mechanical behaviour of ABS 3D printed parts, before and after treatment, were not previously investigated.

[1]  Giorgio Olmi,et al.  Experimental characterization and analytical modelling of the mechanical behaviour of fused deposition processed parts made of ABS-M30 , 2013 .

[2]  Gideon Levy,et al.  RAPID MANUFACTURING AND RAPID TOOLING WITH LAYER MANUFACTURING (LM) TECHNOLOGIES, STATE OF THE ART AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES , 2003 .

[3]  Ming C. Leu,et al.  Rapid prototyping in dentistry: technology and application , 2006 .

[4]  Joshua M. Pearce,et al.  Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions , 2014 .

[5]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Mechanical behavior of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) fused deposition materials. Experimental investigation , 2001 .

[6]  Caroline Sunyong Lee,et al.  Measurement of anisotropic compressive strength of rapid prototyping parts , 2007 .

[7]  Vamsi K. Yadavalli,et al.  Surface modification of fused deposition modeling ABS to enable rapid prototyping of biomedical microdevices , 2013 .

[8]  Hermann Seitz,et al.  A review on 3D micro-additive manufacturing technologies , 2012, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[9]  Ryan B. Wicker,et al.  Analysis of Sealing Methods for FDM-fabricated Parts , 2011 .

[10]  Selçuk Güçeri,et al.  Mechanical characterization of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling , 2003 .

[11]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Design of Fused-Deposition ABS Components for Stiffness and Strength , 2003 .

[12]  Qiao Sun,et al.  Composite Modeling and Analysis for Fabrication of FDM Prototypes with Locally Controlled Properties , 2002 .

[13]  Ismail Durgun,et al.  Experimental investigation of FDM process for improvement of mechanical properties and production cost , 2014 .

[14]  Mehran Solati-Hashjin,et al.  Effect of technical parameters on porous structure and strength of 3D printed calcium sulfate prototypes , 2016 .

[15]  Ján Slota,et al.  Influence of printing conditions on structure in FDM prototypes , 2013 .

[16]  Hermann Seitz,et al.  Characterization and evaluation of a PMMA‐based 3D printing process , 2013 .

[17]  P. Wright,et al.  Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS , 2002 .

[18]  M. Pinto,et al.  Porosity characterization of old Portuguese ceramic tiles , 2012 .

[19]  Robert J. Strong,et al.  A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: I. Process design and modeling , 2014 .

[20]  Ji Zhao,et al.  Influence of Layer Thickness and Raster Angle on the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed PEEK and a Comparative Mechanical Study between PEEK and ABS , 2015, Materials.