Form follows feedback: rethinking cartographic communication

Communication was the first paradigm to gain widespread acceptance amongst the international cartographic community. Drawing on aspects of information theory to rationalise the process of transferring knowledge from the map-maker to the map-user, its aim was to optimise ‘map effectiveness’ by treating the map as a vehicle for communication. From the emergence of the first map communication models of the late 1960s until their demise by the early 1980s, arguably no paradigm has since unified the goals of cartographic theory and practice as successfully. This paper offers a fresh critical appraisal of the cartographic communication paradigm and re-examines its relevance at a time when social media are widely used for disseminating maps and generating feedback – a crucial element of any communication system that received limited attention in earlier map communication models. By proposing a new map communication model, the paper calls for greater convergence between cartographic theory and practice, together with new insights for educating future map-makers.

[1]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Cognitive Map-Design Research in the Twentieth Century: Theoretical and Empirical Approaches , 2002 .

[2]  A. Kent Political Cartography: From Bertin to Brexit , 2016 .

[3]  Alexander J. Kent,et al.  Aesthetics: A Lost Cause in Cartographic Theory? , 2005 .

[4]  J. Muller,et al.  Bertin's Theory Of Graphics / A Challenge To North American Thematic Cartography , 1981 .

[5]  J. Crampton Maps as social constructions: power, communication and visualization , 2001 .

[6]  P. Utrilla,et al.  A palaeolithic map from 13,660 calBP: engraved stone blocks from the Late Magdalenian in Abauntz Cave (Navarra, Spain). , 2009, Journal of human evolution.

[7]  Kenneth Field A Cacophony of Cartography , 2014 .

[8]  Ian Muehlenhaus,et al.  Going Viral: The Look of Online Persuasive Maps , 2014, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[9]  A. Kent Trust Me, I’m a Cartographer: Post-truth and the Problem of Acritical Cartography , 2017 .

[10]  Barbara Bartz Petchenik A Verbal Approach to Characterizing the Look of Maps , 1974 .

[11]  George F. Jenks,et al.  ERROR ON CHOROPLETHIC MAPS: DEFINITION, MEASUREMENT, REDUCTION , 1971 .

[12]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  Emotion and Virality: What Makes Online Content Go Viral? , 2013 .

[13]  J. B. Harley,et al.  DECONSTRUCTING THE MAP , 1989 .

[14]  Robert B Mc Master,et al.  Numerical Cartographic Generalization: An Introduction , 1989 .

[15]  Carla Norwood,et al.  Making Maps That Matter: Situating GIS within Community Conversations about Changing Landscapes , 2012, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[16]  Rosanna E. Guadagno,et al.  What makes a video go viral? An analysis of emotional contagion and Internet memes , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  B. D. Dent VISUAL ORGANIZATION AND THEMATIC MAP COMMUNICATION , 1972 .

[18]  Shu-Yueh Lee,et al.  What makes us click "like" on Facebook? Examining psychological, technological, and motivational factors on virtual endorsement , 2016, Comput. Commun..

[19]  R. Hartley Transmission of information , 1928 .

[20]  Michael W Dobson THE FUTURE OF PERCEPTUAL CARTOGRAPHY , 1985 .

[21]  Arthur H. Robinson,et al.  The Map as a Communication System , 1975 .

[22]  Axelsen Bjørn,et al.  Are all maps mental maps? , 1987 .

[23]  A. H. Robinson,et al.  Cartography 1950-2000 , 1977 .

[24]  W. Cleveland,et al.  Judgments of Circle Sizes on Statistical Maps , 1982 .

[25]  Michael P. Peterson The Internet and Multimedia Cartography , 2007 .

[26]  A. Koláčný Cartographic Information—a Fundamental Concept and Term in Modern Cartography , 1969 .