暂无分享,去创建一个
Adiabatic quantum optimization has attracted a lot of attention because small scale simulations gave hope that it would allow to solve NP-complete problems efficiently. Later, negative results proved the existence of specifically designed hard instances where adiabatic optimization requires exponential time. In spite of this, there was still hope that this would not happen for random instances of NP-complete problems. This is an important issue since random instances are a good model for hard instances that can not be solved by current classical solvers, for which an efficient quantum algorithm would therefore be desirable. Here, we will show that because of a phenomenon similar to Anderson localization, an exponentially small eigenvalue gap appears in the spectrum of the adiabatic Hamiltonian for large random instances, very close to the end of the algorithm. This implies that unfortunately, adiabatic quantum optimization also fails for these instances by getting stuck in a local minimum, unless the computation is exponentially long.
[1] Daniel Gooch,et al. Communications of the ACM , 2011, XRDS.
[2] Physical Review , 1965, Nature.
[3] Akademii︠a︡ medit︠s︡inskikh nauk Sssr. Journal of physics , 1939 .
[4] October I. Physical Review Letters , 2022 .
[5] R. Stephenson. A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.
[6] Dan Suciu,et al. Journal of the ACM , 2006 .