Fast 3D PIV with direct sparse cross-correlations

The extension of the well-assessed high-accuracy algorithms for two-dimensional-two components particle image velocimetry (PIV) to the case of three-dimensional (3D) data involves a considerable increase of the computational cost. Tomographic PIV is strongly affected by this issue, relying on 3D cross-correlation to estimate the velocity field. In this study, a number of solutions are presented, enabling a more efficient calculation of the velocity field without any significant loss of accuracy. A quick estimation of the predictor displacement field is proposed, based on voxels binning in the first steps of the process. The corrector displacement field is efficiently computed by restricting the search area of the correlation peak. In the initial part of the process, the calculation of a reduced cross-correlation map by using Fast Fourier Transform on blocks is suggested, in order to accelerate the processing by avoiding redundant calculations in case of overlapping interrogations windows. Eventually, direct cross-correlations with a search radius of only 1 pixel in the neighborhood of the estimated peak are employed; the final iterations are consistently faster, since direct correlations can better enjoy the sparsity of the distributions, reducing the number of operations to be performed. Furthermore, three different approaches to reduce the number of redundant calculations for overlapping windows are presented, based on pre-calculations of the contributions to the cross-correlations coefficients along segments, planes or blocks. The algorithms are tested both on synthetic and real images, showing that a potential speed-up of up to 800 times can be obtained, depending on the complexity of the flow field to be analyzed. The challenging application on a real swirling jet results in a speed-up of an order of magnitude.

[1]  Dirk Michaelis,et al.  Tomographic and time resolved PIV measurements on a finite cylinder mounted on a flat plate , 2008 .

[2]  R. Adrian Particle-Imaging Techniques for Experimental Fluid Mechanics , 1991 .

[3]  Stanley C. Eisenstat,et al.  Yale sparse matrix package I: The symmetric codes , 1982 .

[4]  Markus Raffel,et al.  Particle Image Velocimetry: A Practical Guide , 2002 .

[5]  Tommaso Astarita,et al.  Analysis of velocity interpolation schemes for image deformation methods in PIV , 2008 .

[6]  Julio Soria,et al.  An efficient simultaneous reconstruction technique for tomographic particle image velocimetry , 2009 .

[7]  Tommaso Astarita,et al.  Adaptive space resolution for PIV , 2009 .

[8]  Tommaso Astarita,et al.  Analysis of weighting windows for image deformation methods in PIV , 2007 .

[9]  Tommaso Astarita,et al.  Analysis of interpolation schemes for image deformation methods in PIV , 2005 .

[10]  C. Willert,et al.  Digital particle image velocimetry , 1991 .

[11]  Bernhard Wieneke,et al.  Tomographic particle image velocimetry , 2006 .

[12]  Nicholas A. Worth,et al.  Acceleration of Tomo-PIV by estimating the initial volume intensity distribution , 2008 .

[13]  Richard D. Keane,et al.  Theory of cross-correlation analysis of PIV images , 1992 .

[14]  A. Lent,et al.  Iterative reconstruction algorithms. , 1976, Computers in biology and medicine.

[15]  Joseph Katz,et al.  Five techniques for increasing the speed and accuracy of PIV interrogation , 2001 .

[16]  Gennaro Cardone,et al.  Heat transfer rate and uniformity in multichannel swirling impinging jets , 2012 .

[17]  J. Westerweel,et al.  The effect of a discrete window offset on the accuracy of cross-correlation analysis of digital PIV recordings , 1997 .

[18]  Kees Joost Batenburg,et al.  Motion tracking-enhanced MART for tomographic PIV , 2010 .

[19]  Fulvio Scarano,et al.  Iterative multigrid approach in PIV image processing with discrete window offset , 1999 .

[20]  Fulvio Scarano,et al.  On the velocity of ghost particles and the bias errors in Tomographic-PIV , 2011 .

[21]  Douglas P. Hart,et al.  Reverse hierarchical PIV processing , 2002 .

[22]  Tommaso Astarita,et al.  Analysis of interpolation schemes for image deformation methods in PIV: effect of noise on the accuracy and spatial resolution , 2006 .

[23]  Fulvio Scarano,et al.  Three-dimensional evolution of flow structures in transitional circular and chevron jets , 2011 .

[24]  F. Scarano Iterative image deformation methods in PIV , 2002 .

[25]  L. Lourenço Particle Image Velocimetry , 1989 .

[26]  Bernhard Wieneke,et al.  Volume self-calibration for 3D particle image velocimetry , 2008 .

[27]  Armin Gruen,et al.  Particle tracking velocimetry in three-dimensional flows , 1993, Experiments in Fluids.

[28]  Stefano Discetti,et al.  A fast multi-resolution approach to tomographic PIV , 2012 .

[29]  J. Nogueira,et al.  Local field correction PIV: on the increase of accuracy of digital PIV systems , 1999 .

[30]  J. Soria An investigation of the near wake of a circular cylinder using a video-based digital cross-correlation particle image velocimetry technique , 1996 .