Creating Socially Conscious Agents: Decision-Making in the Context of Group Commitments

With growing opportunities for individually motivated agents to work collaboratively to satisfy shared goals, it becomes increasingly important to design agents that can make intelligent decisions in the context of commitments to group activities. In particular, agents need to be able to reconcile their intentions to do group-related actions with other, con icting actions. In this thesis, I present the framework for the SPIRE experimental system that allows the process of intention reconciliation in team contexts to be simulated and studied. I de ne a measure of social consciousness and show how it can be incorporated into the SPIRE system. Using SPIRE, I then investigate the e ect of in nite and limited time horizons on agents with varying levels of social consciousness, as well as the resulting e ect on the utility of the group as a whole. Using these experiments as a basis for theoretic conclusions, I suggest preliminary principles for designers of collaborative agents.

[1]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple attribute decision making : an introduction , 1995 .

[2]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Intention Reconcilation in the Context of Teamwork: An Initial Empirical Investigation , 1999, CIA.

[3]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Collaborative Plans for Complex Group Action , 1996, Artif. Intell..

[4]  H. Hollander A Social Exchange Approach to Voluntary Cooperation , 1990 .

[5]  Jon Doyle,et al.  Rational Belief Revision , 1991, KR.

[6]  Sandip Sen,et al.  Reciprocity: a foundational principle for promoting cooperative behavior among self-interested agents , 1996 .

[7]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives—Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1977 .

[8]  Jeffrey S. Rosenschein,et al.  Rules of Encounter - Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation among Computers , 1994 .

[9]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Socially Responsible Decision Making by Autonomous Agents , 1999 .

[10]  R. Gibbons Game theory for applied economists , 1992 .

[11]  Gil Tidhar,et al.  Planned Team Activity , 1992, MAAMAW.

[12]  T. W. Ross,et al.  Cooperation without Reputation: Experimental Evidence from Prisoner's Dilemma Games , 1996 .

[13]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  On Acting Together , 1990, AAAI.

[14]  L. Iannaccone Sacrifice and Stigma: Reducing Free-riding in Cults, Communes, and Other Collectives , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[15]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[16]  David J. Israel,et al.  Plans and resource‐bounded practical reasoning , 1988, Comput. Intell..

[17]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.