Intrafirm Knowledge Transfer and Employee Innovative Behavior: The Role of Total and Balanced Knowledge Flows

Research on intrafirm knowledge transfer has generally found a positive impact of knowledge inflows on the innovation of an organizational unit. However, the role of knowledge outflows during knowledge transfer is less clear. This paper argues that knowledge outflows influence innovation through a self-learning mechanism and a fairness assessment mechanism, and play a unique and important role on team innovation. Based on this new understanding on knowledge outflows, it is necessary to examine the impacts of inflows and outflows simultaneously in innovation research. This paper expresses the sum and difference of knowledge inflows and outflows as total and balanced knowledge flows. A theoretical model is proposed to examine the distinct and synergistic effects of total and balanced knowledge flows on employees' innovative behavior of an organizational unit. The model was tested on 148 retail units of an apparel firm based on survey responses from both shop managers and staff. Results showed that total and balanced flows have independent direct effects and a synergistic effect on employee innovative behavior: employees of a unit had the highest levels of innovative behavior when knowledge flows were high and balanced at the same time. This paper contributes to the literature by taking into account both the direction and magnitude of knowledge transfer to examine team innovation.

[1]  G. Hamel.  Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[2]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Inter-Organizational Knowledge Transfer: Current Themes and Future Prospects , 2008 .

[3]  Björn Ambos,et al.  The Effect of Quantity, Quality and Timing of Headquarters-initiated Knowledge Flows on Subsidiary Performance , 2010 .

[4]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Knowledge Flows Within Multinational Corporations: Explaining Subsidiary Isolation and Its Performance Implications , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[5]  Wenpin Tsai.  Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2001 .

[6]  Wenpin Tsai.  Social Structure of Coopetition Within a Multiunit Organization: Coordination, Competition, and Intraorganizational Knowledge Sharing , 2002 .

[7]  Andrea L. Larson.  Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships , 1992 .

[8]  P. Almeida,et al.  Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: the influence of the MNC and host country on innovation , 2004 .

[9]  Kerrie L. Unsworth,et al.  Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas , 2000 .

[10]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[11]  Jaeyong Song,et al.  Subsidiary absorptive capacity and knowledge transfer within multinational corporations , 2014 .

[12]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[13]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[14]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Different knowledge, different benefits: toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations , 2007 .

[15]  G. Lynn,et al.  Autonomous Teams and New Product Development , 2012 .

[16]  Snejina Michailova,et al.  Subsidiary knowledge flows in multinational corporations: Research accomplishments, gaps, and opportunities , 2012 .

[17]  Angel Cabrera,et al.  Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing , 2006 .

[18]  S. Lui,et al.  An Action Pattern Model of Inter-Firm Cooperation , 2005 .

[19]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Do alliances promote knowledge flows , 2006 .

[20]  R. Chandy,et al.  The Impact of Acquisitions on Innovation: Poison Pill, Placebo, or Tonic? , 2005 .

[21]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[22]  S. Scott,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE , 1994 .

[23]  S. Lippman,et al.  Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition , 1982 .

[24]  Snejina Michailova,et al.  Diagnosing and Fighting Knowledge-Sharing Hostility , 2002 .

[25]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  Salesperson creative performance: conceptualization, measurement, and nomological validity , 2004 .

[26]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[27]  K. Ruyter,et al.  Knowledge Stocks and Information Flows in New Product Development , 2004 .

[28]  Aimée A. Kane.  Unlocking Knowledge Transfer Potential: Knowledge Demonstrability and Superordinate Social Identity , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[29]  R. Handfield,et al.  Knowledge Sharing in Interorganizational Product Development Teams: The Effect of Formal and Informal Socialization Mechanisms* , 2009 .

[30]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Cui Bono? The Selective Revealing of Knowledge and Its Implications for Innovative Activity , 2012 .

[31]  Todd J. Arnold,et al.  Understanding Retail Managers' Role in the Sales of Products and Services , 2009 .

[32]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Inter- and Intra-Organizational Knowledge Transfer: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of its Antecedents and Consequences , 2008 .

[33]  Bernard L. Simonin.  Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances , 1999 .

[34]  Ralph A. Heidl,et al.  Knowledge, Networks, and Knowledge Networks , 2011 .

[35]  Rebecca J. Slotegraaf,et al.  Cross-Functional 'Coopetition': The Simultaneous Role of Cooperation and Competition within Firms , 2006 .

[36]  J. Edwards.  Ten Difference Score Myths , 2001 .

[37]  Niels G. Noorderhaven,et al.  Knowledge flows in MNCs: An empirical test and extension of Gupta and Govindarajan's typology of subsidiary roles , 2006, International Business Review.

[38]  Dhruv Grewal,et al.  Customer Experience Management in Retailing: An Organizing Framework , 2009 .

[39]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  KNOWLEDGE SHARING IN ORGANIZATIONS: MULTIPLE NETWORKS, MULTIPLE PHASES , 2005 .

[40]  Garry Robins,et al.  Structural Logic of Intraorganizational Networks , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[41]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  Answers to 20 Questions About Interrater Reliability and Interrater Agreement , 2008 .

[42]  R. Cropanzano,et al.  Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review , 2005 .

[43]  Patricia M. Norman.  Protecting knowledge in strategic alliances: Resource and relational characteristics , 2002 .

[44]  Dirk De Clercq,et al.  A Closer Look at Cross‐Functional Collaboration and Product Innovativeness: Contingency Effects of Structural and Relational Context , 2011 .

[45]  Martin Schulz,et al.  Pathways of Relevance: Exploring Inflows of Knowledge into Subunits of Multinational Corporations , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[46]  J. Edwards.  The Study of Congruence in Organizational Behavior Research: Critique and a Proposed Alternative , 1994 .

[47]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[48]  Dana Minbaeva,et al.  Knowledge transfer in multinational corporations , 2007 .

[49]  C. Lackman,et al.  Determinants of New Product Development Team Performance: A Meta‐analytic Review , 2012 .

[50]  Anupama Phene,et al.  Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities , 2008 .

[51]  Ram Mudambi,et al.  Conventional and Reverse Knowledge Flows in Multinational Corporations† , 2008 .

[52]  Torben Pedersen,et al.  The impact of knowledge management on MNC subsidiary performance: the role of absorptive capacity , 2005 .

[53]  Linda Argote,et al.  Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[54]  Susan M. Mudambi,et al.  Global Innovation in MNCs: The Effects of Subsidiary Self-Determination and Teamwork† , 2007 .

[55]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  When using knowledge can hurt performance: the value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company , 2005 .

[56]  T. Pedersen,et al.  Does knowledge sharing pay? A multinational subsidiary perspective on knowledge outflows , 2009 .

[57]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[58]  J. Hsuan,et al.  How Do Innovation Intermediaries Add Value? Insight from New Product Development in Fashion Markets , 2010 .

[59]  Qing Cao,et al.  Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[60]  Michael J. Burke,et al.  Estimating Interrater Agreement with the Average Deviation Index: A User’s Guide , 2002 .

[61]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[62]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge Flows and the Structure of Control Within Multinational Corporations , 1991 .

[63]  Corey Phelps,et al.  Learning from What Others Have Learned from You: The Effects of Knowledge Spillovers on Originating Firms , 2009 .