‘Towards a mapping of the student world’: the identification of variation in students' conceptions of, and motivations to learn, introductory accounting

This paper is concerned with a strand of educational research that seeks to support students in developing a better awareness and understanding of themselves as learners. Since it is difficult to ‘know’ our students individually there is value in knowing more about the dimensionality of variation within cohorts of students and the impact that this variation has upon their learning (i.e. how they vary in their engagement of accumulative (surface) or transformative (deep) learning processes). The paper identifies a means of identifying variation within a subject discipline: the linkage of a generic model of student learning (operationalised through the Reflections on Learning Inventory (RoLI©) [Meyer, J.H.F., 2000. An overview of the development and application of the Reflections on Learning Inventory (RoLI). Paper presented at the First RoLI Symposium, Imperial College, University of London, September; Meyer, J.H.F., 2004. The domain of the RoLI and recent extensions to it. Paper presented at the Second RoLI Symposium, Imperial College, University of London, 17th February] with a subject-specific Expectations of Learning Accounting (ELAcc) Inventory. The power of this approach lies in its ability to identify those discipline-specific conceptions and motivations that may be related to accumulative or transformative learning processes. The linked RoLI and ELAcc inventory was administered to 1211 students of introductory accounting across five UK universities. The findings show that there are variations in conception and approach to learning between students who specialise in accounting and those who do not, and between male and female accounting students. They also show the ways in which different conceptions of the subject of accounting are linked with transformative, accumulative and pathological learning processes. The main contribution of this paper is, firstly, to demonstrate that the linked RoLI and ELAcc inventory provides a means of identifying variation within cohorts of students and, secondly, to show that the linked inventory is effective in identifying educationally and statistically significant variation in a student cohort. The findings identify aspects of the linked inventory that require further development and raise important questions to be addressed by further research. However, in its current form the linked inventory also provides an initial diagnostic instrument that may be used to support students in their learning and as a basis for teaching interventions.

[1]  Jan H. F. Meyer,et al.  A Triangulated Approach to the Modelling of Learning Outcomes in First Year Economics , 2001 .

[2]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Understanding Student Learning , 1983 .

[3]  P. Booth,et al.  The quality of learning in accounting education: the impact of approaches to learning on academic performance , 1999 .

[4]  Hian Chye Koh,et al.  The determinants of performance in an accountancy degree programme , 1999 .

[5]  A. Friedman,et al.  The beancounter stereotype: towards a general model of stereotype generation , 2001 .

[6]  Sari Lindblom-Yla¨Nne Broadening an Understanding of the Phenomenon of Dissonance , 2003 .

[7]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Understanding Learning and Teaching: the experience in higher education , 1999 .

[8]  Malcolm Tight Researching Higher Education , 2003 .

[9]  Timothy R. Hinkin A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations , 1995 .

[10]  David E. Stout,et al.  A review of empirical research in accounting education: 1985–1991 , 1991 .

[11]  Louise Clark,et al.  Analysing metalearning in first‐year undergraduates through their reflective discussions and writing , 2004 .

[12]  Ellen Jansen Improving student learning. Theory and practice- 10 years on , 2003 .

[13]  U. Lucas WORLDS APART: STUDENTS' EXPERIENCES OF LEARNING INTRODUCTORY ACCOUNTING☆ , 2000 .

[14]  Marcia B. Baxter Magolda Learning and gender: Complexity and possibility , 1998 .

[15]  Richard Gunstone,et al.  Metacognitive Development as a Shift in Approach to Learning: An in-depth study , 2002 .

[16]  Barbara Flood,et al.  The relationship between learning approaches and learning outcomes: a study of Irish accounting students , 2002 .

[17]  J. Biggs,et al.  The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. , 2001, The British journal of educational psychology.

[18]  Graham Gibbs,et al.  Improving Student Learning Through Course Design , 1997 .

[19]  J H Meyer Variation in contrasting forms of 'memorising' and associated observables. , 2000, The British journal of educational psychology.

[20]  David E. Stout,et al.  Accounting education literature review (1991–1997), part II: students, educational technology, assessment and faculty issues , 1998 .

[21]  Jan H. F. Meyer,et al.  On the operationalisation of conceptions of learning in higher education and their association with students’ knowledge and experiences of their learning , 1999 .

[22]  J. Biggs THE ROLE OF METALEARNING IN STUDY PROCESSES , 1985 .

[23]  Sari Lindblom-Ylänne,et al.  Raising students' awareness of their approaches to study , 2004 .

[24]  Tamsin Haggis Constructing Images of Ourselves? A Critical Investigation into 'Approaches to Learning' Research in Higher Education , 2003 .

[25]  Erno Lehtinen,et al.  Difficulties Experienced by Education and Sociology Students in Quantitative Methods Courses , 2003 .

[26]  David E. Stout,et al.  Accounting education literature review (1991–1997), part I: Curriculum and instructional approaches , 1998 .

[27]  Pat Drake Mathematics and All That , 2001 .

[28]  U. Lucas Deep and surface approaches to learning within introductory accounting: a phenomenographic study , 2001 .

[29]  John T. E. Richardson Researching Student Learning , 2000 .

[30]  U. Lucas CONTRADICTIONS AND UNCERTAINTIES: LECTURERS' CONCEPTIONS OF TEACHING INTRODUCTORY ACCOUNTING☆ , 2002 .

[31]  R. Fisher,et al.  A pariah profession? Some student perceptions of accounting and accountancy , 1995 .

[32]  Jackie Nicholas,et al.  University mathematics students' conceptions of mathematics , 1998 .

[33]  Jan H. F. Meyer *,et al.  Developing metalearning capacity in students: actionable theory and practical lessons learned in first‐year economics , 2004 .

[34]  M. G. Eley,et al.  The development of affective subscales to reflect variation in students' experiences of studying mathematics in higher education , 1999 .

[35]  Jan H. F. Meyer,et al.  Modelling the influences on learning outcomes of study processes in university mathematics , 2004 .

[36]  R. Säljö Learning about learning , 1979 .

[37]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Reliability and replicability of the Approaches to Studying Questionnaire , 1990 .

[38]  R. Davidson Relationship of study approach and exam performance , 2002 .

[39]  Divesh S. Sharma,et al.  Accounting students' learning conceptions, approaches to learning, and the influence of the learning–teaching context on approaches to learning , 1997 .

[40]  Dissonant Forms of 'Memorising' and 'Repetition' , 2003 .

[41]  G. Webb Deconstructing deep and surface: Towards a critique of phenomenography , 1997 .

[42]  Sue Gordon,et al.  What Counts for Students Studying Statistics , 1995 .

[43]  R. Mladenovic,et al.  An investigation into ways of challenging introductory accounting students' negative perceptions of accounting , 2000 .

[44]  Jan H. F. Meyer The modelling of ‘dissonant’ study orchestration in higher education , 2000 .