Maximum Photosynthetic Yield of Green Microalgae in Photobioreactors

The biomass yield on light energy of Dunaliella tertiolecta and Chlorella sorokiniana was investigated in a 1.25- and 2.15-cm light path panel photobioreactor at constant ingoing photon flux density (930 µmol photons m−2 s−1). At the optimal combination of biomass density and dilution rate, equal biomass yields on light energy were observed for both light paths for both microalgae. The observed biomass yield on light energy appeared to be based on a constant intrinsic biomass yield and a constant maintenance energy requirement per gram biomass. Using the model of Pirt (New Phytol 102:3–37, 1986), a biomass yield on light energy of 0.78 and 0.75 g mol photons−1 and a maintenance requirement of 0.0133 and 0.0068 mol photons g−1 h−1 were found for D. tertiolecta and C. sorokiniana, respectively. The observed yield decreases steeply at low light supply rates, and according to this model, this is related to the increase of the amount of useable light energy diverted to biomass maintenance. With this study, we demonstrated that the observed biomass yield on light in short light path bioreactors at high biomass densities decreases because maintenance requirements are relatively high at these conditions. All our experimental data for the two strains tested could be described by the physiological models of Pirt (New Phytol 102:3–37, 1986). Consequently, for the design of a photobioreactor, we should maintain a relatively high specific light supply rate. A process with high biomass densities and high yields at high light intensities can only be obtained in short light path photobioreactors.

[1]  G. C. Zittelli,et al.  Efficiency of sunlight utilization: tubular versus flat photobioreactors , 1998, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[2]  P. V. van Bodegom,et al.  Microbial Maintenance: A Critical Review on Its Quantification , 2007, Microbial ecology.

[3]  B. Palsson,et al.  Elemental balancing of biomass and medium composition enhances growth capacity in high-density Chlorella vulgaris cultures. , 1998, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[4]  S. Pirt,et al.  THE THERMODYNAMIC EFFICIENCY (QUANTUM DEMAND) AND DYNAMICS OF PHOTOSYNTHETIC GROWTH. , 1986, The New phytologist.

[5]  Carlos Vílchez,et al.  Productivity of Chlorella sorokiniana in a short light‐path (SLP) panel photobioreactor under high irradiance , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  P. K. Gallagher,et al.  Handbook of thermal analysis and calorimetry , 1998 .

[7]  K. Niyogi,et al.  Non-photochemical quenching. A response to excess light energy. , 2001, Plant physiology.

[8]  A. Richmond,et al.  Efficient use of strong light for high photosynthetic productivity: interrelationships between the optical path, the optimal population density and cell-growth inhibition. , 2003, Biomolecular engineering.

[9]  P. Falkowski,et al.  Light Harvesting and Utilization by Phytoplankton , 1986 .

[10]  Hu Qiang,et al.  Combined effects of light intensity, light-path and culture density on output rate of Spirulina platensis (Cyanobacteria) , 1998 .

[11]  Anne Kahru,et al.  The computer-controlled continuous culture of Escherichia coli with smooth change of dilution rate (A-stat) , 1995 .

[12]  Antonietta Quigg,et al.  THE ELEMENTAL COMPOSITION OF SOME MARINE PHYTOPLANKTON 1 , 2003 .

[13]  René H. Wijffels,et al.  Design Process of an Area-Efficient Photobioreactor , 2008, Marine Biotechnology.

[14]  Yuan-Kun Lee,et al.  Determination of biomass dry weight of marine microalgae , 1997, Journal of Applied Phycology.

[15]  Hu Qiang,et al.  Productivity and photosynthetic efficiency ofSpirulina platensis as affected by light intensity, algal density and rate of mixing in a flat plate photobioreactor , 2004, Journal of Applied Phycology.

[16]  Maria J Barbosa,et al.  Optimization of biomass, vitamins, and carotenoid yield on light energy in a flat-panel reactor using the A-stat technique. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[17]  J. Tramper,et al.  Controlling light‐use by Rhodobacter capsulatus continuous cultures in a flat‐panel photobioreactor , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[18]  U. Schmid-Staiger,et al.  A novel airlift photobioreactor with baffles for improved light utilization through the flashing light effect. , 2001, Journal of biotechnology.

[19]  Hadiyanto,et al.  Overcoming shear stress of microalgae cultures in sparged photobioreactors , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[20]  David Faiman,et al.  Optimal tilt angles of enclosed reactors for growing photoautotrophic microorganisms outdoors , 1998 .

[21]  H Guterman,et al.  A flat inclined modular photobioreactor for outdoor mass cultivation of photoautotrophs , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[22]  René H Wijffels,et al.  Potential of sponges and microalgae for marine biotechnology. , 2008, Trends in biotechnology.

[23]  Jeffrey M. Gordon,et al.  Tailoring optical systems to optimized photobioreactors , 2002 .

[24]  A. Richmond,et al.  Optimization of a flat plate glass reactor for mass production of Nannochloropsis sp. outdoors. , 2001, Journal of biotechnology.

[25]  Ulrike Schmid-Staiger,et al.  Optimization of eicosapentaenoic acid production byPhaeodactylum tricornutumin the flat panel airlift (FPA) reactor , 2004, Journal of Applied Phycology.

[26]  Q. Hu,et al.  Ultrahigh-cell-density culture of a marine green alga Chlorococcum littorale in a flat-plate photobioreactor , 1998, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[27]  P. Horton,et al.  Molecular design of the photosystem II light-harvesting antenna: photosynthesis and photoprotection. , 2004, Journal of experimental botany.

[28]  Y. Chisti Biodiesel from microalgae. , 2007, Biotechnology advances.