Reproduction in farm animals in an era of rapid genetic change: will genetic change outpace our knowledge of physiology?

Compared with other domestic species, genetic nucleus selection has gradually increased both prolificacy and productivity of the breeding sow and the post-natal growth performance of commercial progeny. However, increasing variation in litter birth weight and foetal development may be indirect consequences of interactions among multiple genes controlling prolificacy and prenatal development. Phenotypic plasticity in the litter phenotype also results from effects of sow metabolic state on the developing embryo. New genomic tools may provide the opportunity to better balance the selection of genes controlling the component traits affecting the size and quality of litters born, particularly in multiparous sows.

[1]  B. Kemp,et al.  Should weaning be the start of the reproductive cycle in hyper-prolific sows? A physiological view. , 2012, Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene.

[2]  B. Kemp,et al.  Nutritionally induced relationships between insulin levels during the weaning-to-ovulation interval and reproductive characteristics in multiparous sows: I. Luteinizing hormone, follicle development, oestrus and ovulation. , 2012, Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene.

[3]  B. Kemp,et al.  Nutritionally induced relationships between insulin levels during the weaning-to-ovulation interval and reproductive characteristics in multiparous sows: II. Luteal development, progesterone and conceptus development and uniformity. , 2012, Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene.

[4]  G. Foxcroft,et al.  Restricted feed intake in lactating primiparous sows. I. Effects on sow metabolic state and subsequent reproductive performance. , 2011, Reproduction, fertility, and development.

[5]  J. Dekkers,et al.  Genetic improvement of the pig. , 2011 .

[6]  J. Bidanel.  Biology and Genetics of reproduction , 2011 .

[7]  L. Greiner,et al.  The effect of gonadotropin treatment at weaning on primiparous sow performance. , 2010 .

[8]  M. Dyck,et al.  IMPROVING PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY IN A COMPETITIVE INDUSTRY , 2010 .

[9]  W. Dixon,et al.  Prenatal programming of postnatal development in the pig. , 2020, Society of Reproduction and Fertility supplement.

[10]  B. Kemp,et al.  Ovarian responses to lactation management strategies. , 2009, Society of Reproduction and Fertility supplement.

[11]  J. Lowe,et al.  Responses to delayed estrus after weaning in sows using oral progestagen treatment. , 2008, Journal of animal science.

[12]  B. Kemp,et al.  Feeding level does not affect progesterone levels in intermittently suckled sows with lactational ovulation. , 2008, Animal reproduction science.

[13]  B. Kemp,et al.  Early embryo survival and development in sows with lactational ovulation. , 2007, Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene.

[14]  B. Kemp,et al.  Peri-oestrus hormone profiles and follicle growth in lactating sows with oestrus induced by intermittent suckling. , 2007, Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene.

[15]  H. Quesnel,et al.  Management of High Prolificacy in French Herds: Can We Alleviate Side Effects on Piglet Survival? , 2008 .

[16]  W. Dixon,et al.  Macroenvironment effects on oocytes and embryos in swine. , 2007, Theriogenology.

[17]  J. Wiseman,et al.  Consequences of selection for litter size on piglet development. , 2007 .

[18]  B. Kemp,et al.  Intermittent suckling: tackling lactational anoestrus and alleviating weaning risks for piglets , 2007 .

[19]  C. Rehfeldt,et al.  Consequences of birth weight for postnatal growth performance and carcass quality in pigs as related to myogenesis. , 2006, Journal of animal science.

[20]  C. Putman,et al.  The biological basis for prenatal programming of postnatal performance in pigs. , 2006, Journal of animal science.

[21]  W. Dixon,et al.  Nutritional restriction in lactating primiparous sows selectively affects female embryo survival and overall litter development. , 2006, Reproduction, fertility, and development.

[22]  E. Beltranena,et al.  Recognizing the characteristics of our new dam lines , 2005 .

[23]  Y. Le Cozler,et al.  Influence of piglet birth weight on postnatal growth performance, tissue lipogenic capacity and muscle histological traits at market weight , 2005 .

[24]  G. Foxcroft,et al.  Prenatal Programming of Postnatal Performance - the Unseen Cause of Variance , 2004 .

[25]  C. Haley,et al.  Prospects in pig genetics , 2003 .

[26]  Nathalie Quiniou,et al.  Variation of piglets’ birth weight and consequences on subsequent performance , 2002 .

[27]  M. Kalpravidh,et al.  New developments in genetic selection for litter size and piglet survival , 2002 .

[28]  G. Plastow,et al.  Developments in pig breeding and the role of research , 2001 .

[29]  J. Cosgrove,et al.  Pattern of feed intake and associated metabolic and endocrine changes differentially affect postweaning fertility in primiparous lactating sows. , 1997, Journal of animal science.