Number-space mapping in the newborn chick resembles humans’ mental number line

Even chicks may count from left to right For the most part, humans represent numbers across a mental number line, with smaller numbers on the left and larger numbers on the right. Some have argued that this is due to culture rather than being innate. Rugani et al., however, show that 3-day-old chicks share this representation of numbers, consistently seeking lower numbers to the left of a target and larger numbers to the right (see the Perspective by Brugger). These results suggest that there may be an innate spatial representation of numerical values that we share with other animals. Science, this issue p. 534; see also p. 477 Baby chicks also “count” from left to right. [Also see Perspective by Brugger] Humans represent numbers along a mental number line (MNL), where smaller values are located on the left and larger on the right. The origin of the MNL and its connections with cultural experience are unclear: Pre-verbal infants and nonhuman species master a variety of numerical abilities, supporting the existence of evolutionary ancient precursor systems. In our experiments, 3-day-old domestic chicks, once familiarized with a target number (5), spontaneously associated a smaller number (2) with the left space and a larger number (8) with the right space. The same number (8), though, was associated with the left space when the target number was 20. Similarly to humans, chicks associate smaller numbers with the left space and larger numbers with the right space.

[1]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  A left-sided visuospatial bias in birds , 2005, Current Biology.

[2]  H S Terrace,et al.  Ordering of the numerosities 1 to 9 by monkeys. , 1998, Science.

[3]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[4]  B. P. Klein,et al.  Topographic Representation of Numerosity in the Human Parietal Cortex , 2013, Science.

[5]  Fabrizio Doricchi,et al.  Small numbers in the right brain: Evidence from patients without and with spatial neglect , 2013, Cortex.

[6]  L. Regolin The Case of the Line-Bisection: When Both Humans and Chickens Wander Left , 2006, Cortex.

[7]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  The spatial representation of numbers: evidence from neglect and pseudoneglect , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Harlene Hayne,et al.  Pigeons on Par with Primates in Numerical Competence , 2011, Science.

[9]  L. Elias,et al.  Dynamic stimuli: Accentuating aesthetic preference biases , 2014, Laterality.

[10]  J. Beaumont Lateral organization and aesthetic preference: The importance of peripheral visual asymmetries , 1985, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  R. Heath,et al.  Comparison of aesthetic preferences among Roman and Arabic script readers , 2005, Laterality.

[12]  Fabrizio Doricchi,et al.  No inherent left and right side in human 'mental number line': evidence from right brain damage. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  The interplay between nonsymbolic number and its continuous visual properties. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  L. Regolin,et al.  From small to large: numerical discrimination by young domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). , 2014, Journal of comparative psychology.

[15]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Measuring spatial–numerical associations: evidence for a purely conceptual link , 2016, Psychological research.

[16]  Samar Zebian,et al.  Linkages between Number Concepts, Spatial Thinking, and Directionality of Writing: The SNARC Effect and the REVERSE SNARC Effect in English and Arabic Monoliterates, Biliterates, and Illiterate Arabic Speakers , 2005 .

[17]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Asymmetrical number-space mapping in the avian brain , 2011, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[18]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) map number onto space , 2014, Cognition.

[19]  S. Christman,et al.  Lateral biases in aesthetic preferences: pictorial dimensions and neural mechanisms. , 1997, Laterality.

[20]  Ikuma Adachi,et al.  Spontaneous Spatial Mapping of Learned Sequence in Chimpanzees: Evidence for a SNARC-Like Effect , 2014, PloS one.

[21]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Is it only humans that count from left to right? , 2010, Biology Letters.

[22]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  Spatial Associations in Numerical Cognition—From Single Digits to Arithmetic , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  M. McCourt,et al.  Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Rudimental numerical competence in 5-day-old domestic chicks (Gallus gallus): identification of ordinal position. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[26]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[27]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  Basic Math in Monkeys and College Students , 2007, PLoS biology.

[28]  K. Priftis,et al.  Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line , 2002, Nature.

[29]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Arithmetic in newborn chicks , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Coding of abstract quantity by ‘number neurons’ of the primate brain , 2012, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[31]  E. L. Kaufman,et al.  The discrimination of visual number. , 1949, The American journal of psychology.

[32]  Wim Fias,et al.  Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of number-space interactions. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  M. Neppi-Modona,et al.  Functional independence between numerical and visual space: Evidence from right brain-damaged patients , 2012, Cortex.

[34]  Elizabeth Roberts-Pedersen,et al.  Damage , 2014 .

[35]  Luisa Girelli,et al.  Human Infants' Preference for Left-to-Right Oriented Increasing Numerical Sequences , 2014, PloS one.

[36]  Wim Fias,et al.  Non-spatial neglect for the mental number line , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  Carlos Montemayor,et al.  Space , Time and Number in the Brain : Searching for the Foundations of Mathematical Thought , 2015 .

[38]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Representation of the Quantity of Visual Items in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2002, Science.

[39]  E. Brannon,et al.  Commentary on: “Number-space mapping in the newborn chick resembles humans' mental number line” , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[40]  L. Regolin,et al.  Numerical Abstraction in Young Domestic Chicks (Gallus gallus) , 2013, PloS one.

[41]  Lorin J Elias,et al.  Lateral biases in lighting of abstract artwork , 2011, Laterality.

[42]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Representation of numerosity in posterior parietal cortex , 2012, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[43]  Removing spatial responses reveals spatial concepts—even in a culture with mixed reading habits , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..