Influence of sorption time in CO2-ECBM process in Indian coals using coupled numerical simulation

Abstract Production of coal-bed methane from a reservoir is a function of several parameters, including in situ gas content, the permeability of the coal, and the thickness of the coal seams. Such coal seams usually have low sorption time and there is an easy release of methane from coal upon pressure depletion due to water extraction. Coals with high sorption time are usually not suitable from an economical point of view. This study investigates the role of sorption time in the production behavior of coal under carbon dioxide injection using numerical simulation. A thick coal seam at an intermediate depth of 1600 ft was modeled with two production wells and one injection well between them. Sorption time was varied and the water/methane production and CO 2 injection behavior were monitored up to a period of 4000 days. It was found that coals with non-equilibrium sorption time have high CO 2 adsorption capacity. Therefore, they can be considered for the enhanced recovery of methane with gas injection. A large quantity of water is released from this type of coal until the start of methane desorption, and despite CO 2 injection the onset of gas release remains delayed. At the end of the first year, a reduction of nearly 50% water production was computed for coal with sorption time τ  = 0.1 day, while water release reduced by only 23.5% for coal with τ  = 50 days. The rate of CO 2 injection after six months duration increased to 41.6 mscfd in the case of high sorption time coal, while it rose to only 20 mscfd for low sorption time coal, indicating almost double the rate of gas injection in the former case. The first year methane production from a coal with τ  = 0.1 day was 90 mscf, and that for τ  = 300 days was 42 mscf. At the end of the fifth year, the cumulative gas production was 842 mscf and 613 mscf respectively for the respective varieties, showing that the difference slowly reduced. Possible mechanisms to understand the behavior of coals with different sorption times are proposed. It is also established that coals with sorption time less than 10 days follow an equilibrium trend in typical Indian Gondwana settings.

[1]  Pathegama Gamage Ranjith,et al.  Numerical modeling of Gondwana coal seams in India as coalbed methane reservoirs substituted for carbon dioxide sequestration , 2013 .

[2]  Luke D. Connell,et al.  Effects of matrix moisture on gas diffusion and flow in coal , 2010 .

[3]  H. G. Harris,et al.  Simulation and Economics of Coalbed Methane Production in the Powder River Basin , 1992 .

[4]  R. Bustin,et al.  Geological controls on coalbed methane reservoir capacity and gas content , 1998 .

[5]  T. Ertekin,et al.  A Comprehensive Study of Pressure Transient Analysis With Sorption Phenomena for Single-Phase Gas Flow in Coal Seams , 1990 .

[6]  Karl T. Schroeder,et al.  Effect of moisture on adsorption isotherms and adsorption capacities of CO2 on coals , 2009 .

[7]  S. Kelemen,et al.  Physical properties of selected block Argonne Premium bituminous coal related to CO2, CH4, and N2 adsorption , 2009 .

[8]  G. R. King,et al.  A parametric study of the effects of coal seam properties on gas drainage efficiency , 1986 .

[9]  M. Lamberson,et al.  Coalbed Methane Characteristics of Gates Formation Coals, Northeastern British Columbia: Effect of Maceral Composition , 1993 .

[10]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  Investigating the effect of sorption time on coalbed methane recovery through numerical simulation , 2011 .

[11]  Pathegama Gamage Ranjith,et al.  CO2 permeability of Indian bituminous coals: Implications for carbon sequestration , 2013 .

[12]  Pathegama Gamage Ranjith,et al.  A review of studies on CO2 sequestration and caprock integrity , 2010 .

[13]  Andreas Busch,et al.  Measurement and interpretation of supercritical CO2 sorption on various coals , 2007 .

[14]  Pathegama Gamage Ranjith,et al.  Permeability of sub-critical carbon dioxide in naturally fractured Indian bituminous coal at a range of down-hole stress conditions , 2013 .

[15]  Daniel Bienstock,et al.  Sorption of methane in moist coal , 1973 .

[16]  Xiaochun Li,et al.  Challenging combination of CO2 geological storage and coal mining in the Ordos basin, China , 2014 .

[17]  S. Yusup,et al.  The influence of temperature on adsorption capacity of Malaysian coal , 2006 .

[18]  J. E. Warren,et al.  The Behavior of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs , 1963 .

[19]  Peter J. Crosdale,et al.  Role of coal type and rank on methane sorption characteristics of Bowen Basin, Australia coals , 1999 .

[20]  Meng Lu,et al.  A model for the flow of gas mixtures in adsorption dominated dual porosity reservoirs incorporating multi-component matrix diffusion Part I. Theoretical development , 2007 .

[21]  Basil Beamish,et al.  Coalbed methane sorption related to coal composition , 1998 .

[22]  Y. Gensterblum,et al.  High-pressure methane and carbon dioxide adsorption on dry and moisture-equilibrated Pennsylvanian coals , 2002 .