A Multilevel Approach for Social Transformations and its Implications on Service Design Education.

Abstract: This paper is looking at two parallel transformations -in the methodological approach to service design and in the way new social initiatives are designing new solutions – to suggest a framework to re-organise service design education. The paradigmatic framework for the service design discipline is shifting from a methodological approach that qualified services as “what is not a product” to a new approach that moves the control over the value creation process from designers and producers to the interaction among a constellation of stakeholders. Together with this shift, a parallel transformation can be observed in society, with the emergence of new organisational forms, based on collaboration, P2P and sharing concepts, which have a disruptive power over the existing social and economic system. The new initiatives, are often promoted and controlled by citizens, users or constellation of stakeholders and are framed in production/business models that do not refer to the value-chain model that inspired the industrial paradigm. Both those transformations are challenging the discipline of service design and in particular service design education, because it calls for a perspective shift, from a normative perspective, in which the designer (and consequently the service provider) was deciding modes and characteristics of value creation, to a perspective in which the designer/service provider is simply mediating the process of co-creation by generating means that support social transformation. This paper will propose a framework of new competences and tools that are being developed in design education and research, in order to address the different levels of this structure.

[1]  Daniela Sangiorgi,et al.  Transformative Services and Transformation Design , 2011 .

[2]  Nico la More Challenges in Designing and Scaling-up Community Services , 2014 .

[3]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[4]  Nicola Morelli,et al.  New representation techniques for designing in a systemic perspective , 2007, Nordes 2007: Design Inquiries.

[5]  Johan Blomkvist,et al.  Representing Future Situations of Service , 2014 .

[6]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution , 2008 .

[7]  Daniel Wolstenholme,et al.  Service Design: From Insight to Implementation , 2016 .

[8]  Simon Clatworthy,et al.  Service design thinking , 2017 .

[9]  Matthias Abt,et al.  Designing Interactive Strategy From Value Chain To Value Constellation , 2016 .

[10]  Christian Bason,et al.  Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-creating for a Better Society , 2010 .

[11]  R. Fisk,et al.  Multilevel Service Design: From Customer Value Constellation to Service Experience Blueprinting , 2011 .

[12]  Dirk Snelders,et al.  The Object of Service Design , 2011, Design Issues.

[13]  Amalia de Götzen,et al.  Service Dominant Logic. Changing Perspective, Revising the Toolbox , 2016 .

[14]  Lucy Kimbell,et al.  Designing for Service as One Way of Designing Services , 2011 .

[15]  R. Ramírez Value co-production: intellectual origins and implications for practice and research , 1999 .

[16]  Ezio Manzini,et al.  Solution oriented partnership. How to design industrialised sustainable solutions , 2004 .

[17]  Per-Anders Hillgren,et al.  Prototyping and infrastructuring in design for social innovation , 2011 .

[18]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research , 1985 .

[19]  Per-Anders Hillgren,et al.  Participatory design and "democratizing innovation" , 2010, PDC '10.

[20]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-Dominant Logic: Premises, Perspectives, Possibilities , 2014 .

[21]  Lucy Kimbell The service innovation handbook : action-oriented creative thinking toolkit for service organizations : templates, cases, capabilities , 2014 .