Individuation and holistic processing of faces in rhesus monkeys

Despite considerable evidence that neural activity in monkeys reflects various aspects of face perception, relatively little is known about monkeys' face processing abilities. Two characteristics of face processing observed in humans are a subordinate-level entry point, here, the default recognition of faces at the subordinate, rather than basic, level of categorization, and holistic effects, i.e. perception of facial displays as an integrated whole. The present study used an adaptation paradigm to test whether untrained rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) display these hallmarks of face processing. In experiments 1 and 2, macaques showed greater rebound from adaptation to conspecific faces than to other animals at the individual or subordinate level. In experiment 3, exchanging only the bottom half of a monkey face produced greater rebound in aligned than in misaligned composites, indicating that for normal, aligned faces, the new bottom half may have influenced the perception of the whole face. Scan path analysis supported this assertion: during rebound, fixation to the unchanged eye region was renewed, but only for aligned stimuli. These experiments show that macaques naturally display the distinguishing characteristics of face processing seen in humans and provide the first clear demonstration that holistic information guides scan paths for conspecific faces.

[1]  W. Eberhard Miniaturized orb-weaving spiders: behavioural precision is not limited by small size , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  R L FANTZ,et al.  The origin of form perception. , 1961, Scientific American.

[3]  P. Bennett,et al.  Inversion Leads to Quantitative, Not Qualitative, Changes in Face Processing , 2004, Current Biology.

[4]  T. Fransson,et al.  Fuelling decisions in migratory birds: geomagnetic cues override the seasonal effect , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  The complex structure of hunter–gatherer social networks , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  What's lost in inverted faces? , 1993, Cognition.

[7]  S. Gill,et al.  Context matters: female aggression and testosterone in a year-round territorial neotropical songbird (Thryothorus leucotis) , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  D. Perrett,et al.  Visual neurones responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  J. Neiworth,et al.  A test of the generality of perceptually based categories found in infants: attentional differences toward natural kinds by New World monkeys. , 2004, Developmental science.

[11]  J. Winslow,et al.  Is the inversion effect in rhesus monkeys face-specific? , 1999, Animal Cognition.

[12]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and Configuration of Faces , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  C. Keating,et al.  Monkeys and mug shots: cues used by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) to recognize a human face. , 1993, Journal of comparative psychology.

[14]  Robert W. Doty,et al.  Hemispheric specialization displayed by man but not macaques for analysis of faces , 1982, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[16]  L B Cohen,et al.  Concept acquisition in the human infant. , 1979, Child development.

[17]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Specialized face processing and hemispheric asymmetry in man and monkey: Evidence from single unit and reaction time studies , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[18]  T. Valentine Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[19]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Face recognition: A study in information fusion using fuzzy integral , 2005, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[20]  L. Vigilant,et al.  Potential for female kin associations in wild western gorillas despite female dispersal , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  M. Tomonaga How laboratory-raised Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata) perceive rotated photographs of monkeys: Evidence for an inversion effect in face perception , 1994, Primates.

[22]  G. Hole Configurational Factors in the Perception of Unfamiliar Faces , 1994, Perception.

[23]  Katalin M. Gothard,et al.  How do rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) scan faces in a visual paired comparison task? , 2004, Animal Cognition.

[24]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[25]  V. Bruce,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology When Inverted Faces Are Recognized: the Role of Configural Information in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[26]  N. Humphrey Species and Individuals in the Perceptual World of Monkeys , 1974, Perception.

[27]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  The Training and Transfer of Real-World Perceptual Expertise , 2005, Psychological science.

[28]  R. Phillips,et al.  Recognition of Upright and Inverted Faces: A Correlational Study , 1979, Perception.

[29]  I. Nachson,et al.  Effect of inversion on the recognition of external and internal facial features. , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[30]  John L. Bradshaw,et al.  Models for the processing and identification of faces , 1971 .

[31]  J. Speakman,et al.  Energetic costs of parasitism in the Cape ground squirrel Xerus inauris , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  V. Bruce,et al.  Mental rotation of faces , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[33]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[34]  Sasan Mahmoodi,et al.  How do monkeys view faces?—a study of eye movements , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  G. V. Hoesen,et al.  Face recognition in the rhesus monkey , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  D. B. Bender,et al.  Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the Macaque. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  T. Czárán,et al.  Spatial structure inhibits the rate of invasion of beneficial mutations in asexual populations , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  Anthony A. Wright,et al.  Monkey and Human Face Perception: Inversion Effects for Human Faces But Not for Monkey Faces or Scenes , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  Keating Cf,et al.  Monkeys and mug shots: cues used by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) to recognize a human face , 1993 .

[40]  M. Riesenhuber,et al.  Face processing in humans is compatible with a simple shape–based model of vision , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  D. K. Candland,et al.  Baboon (Papio hamadryas) visual preferences for regions of the face. , 1987, Journal of comparative psychology.

[42]  R. Desimone,et al.  Visual properties of neurons in a polysensory area in superior temporal sulcus of the macaque. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Ultra High-Resolution fMRI in Monkeys with Implanted RF Coils , 2002, Neuron.

[44]  R. Desimone,et al.  Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[45]  Thomas D. Albright,et al.  How Do Monkeys Look at Faces? , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  S. Rakover Featural vs. configurational information in faces: a conceptual and empirical analysis. , 2002, British journal of psychology.

[47]  C. Bruce,et al.  Face recognition by monkeys: Absence of an inversion effect , 1982, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  V Bruce,et al.  Configural Features in the Context of Upright and Inverted Faces , 2001, Perception.

[49]  J. Tanaka The entry point of face recognition: evidence for face expertise. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[51]  M. Tomonaga,et al.  Do infant Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) categorize objects without specific training? , 2004, Primates.

[52]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Face recognition in primates: a cross-species study , 1998, Behavioural Processes.

[53]  K. Peschke,et al.  The smell of parents: breeding status influences cuticular hydrocarbon pattern in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Visual Recognition As Soon as You Know It Is There, You Know What It Is , 2022 .

[55]  Kathy E. Johnson,et al.  Effects of varying levels of expertise on the basic level of categorization. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[56]  A. L. Yarbus Eye Movements During Perception of Complex Objects , 1967 .

[57]  T. H. Widarto,et al.  Discrimination of macaques by macaques: the case of Sulawesi species , 1997, Primates.

[58]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Pictures and names: Making the connection , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[59]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[60]  T Valentine,et al.  The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[61]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.