Welfare Assessment of Invertebrates: Adapting the Animal Welfare Assessment Grid (AWAG) for Zoo Decapods and Cephalopods

Simple Summary The use of decapods (such as lobsters and crabs) and cephalopods (such as octopuses and cuttlefish) by humans for food, experimentation and education (e.g., in zoos and aquariums) is on the increase. Growing evidence that these species have feelings and can experience emotions has highlighted the need for a tool to monitor the welfare of these species in captivity. This study adapted a welfare monitoring tool, the Animal Welfare Assessment Grid, that has been successfully used with a variety of mammal and bird species, for use with decapods and cephalopods. This tool was then trialed at a zoological institution (Marwell Zoo, UK) and, for the first time, a public aquarium (National Marine Aquarium, UK), with the intention of showing how data collected on invertebrates in a zoological environment can be both efficiently and easily applied to implement positive welfare. This study highlights how evaluating the welfare impact of management processes using animal-based indicators can lead to improved welfare outcomes. Abstract Consumer demand for invertebrates is on the rise as their numbers in the wild dwindle. However, with the growing conservation efforts of modern zoos and aquariums, and evidence from over 300 studies showing that invertebrates are capable of sentience, public interest, and moral concern for welfare of invertebrates have increased. The challenge for zoos and aquariums is in developing an objective and repeatable method for evaluating welfare that can be applied to invertebrates in zoological collections. Recently introduced into zoological collection management is the Animal Welfare Assessment Grid (AWAG). The AWAG helps to identify negative and positive welfare states, through assessing animal- and environmental-based indicators to make changes that lead to a better quality of life. Originally developed for the assessment of laboratory primates, the system has been successfully adapted to assess a variety of taxa across different environments, facilitated by the development of cloud-based software. In this study, the AWAG has been adapted to assess the cumulative lifetime experience of captive decapods and cephalopods at two different institutions, Marwell Zoo and National Marine Aquarium. This study has provided further evidence that the AWAG is adaptable and demonstrates the first time any objective scoring system has been successfully adapted for use in invertebrates. Through graphical representation, the results show that the AWAG identifies changes in welfare scores that can be attributed to specific events and can be used to predict the future vulnerability of species to welfare changes and suggest alternative management methods. This monitoring tool provides a versatile method of implementing practical welfare monitoring in zoos and aquariums.

[1]  Melissa A Truelove,et al.  Harmonisation of welfare indicators for macaques and marmosets used or bred for research , 2022, F1000Research.

[2]  S. Wickens Review of the evidence of sentience in cephalopod molluscs and decapod crustaceans , 2022, Animal Welfare.

[3]  A. Insch,et al.  Rallying support for animal welfare on Twitter: a tale of four destination boycotts , 2021, Tourism Recreation Research.

[4]  K. King,et al.  Injury frequency and severity in crayfish communities as indicators of physical habitat quality and water quality within agricultural headwater streams , 2020, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[5]  I. Mikhalevich,et al.  Minds without spines: Evolutionarily inclusive animal ethics , 2020, Animal Sentience.

[6]  Angga Prawadika Aji The role of social media in shaping the animal protection movement in indonesia , 2019, Jurnal Studi Komunikasi (Indonesian Journal of Communications Studies).

[7]  W. Winlow,et al.  Editorial: Sentience, Pain, and Anesthesia in Advanced Invertebrates , 2019, Front. Physiol..

[8]  G. Fiorito,et al.  Cephalopod Welfare, Biological and Regulatory Aspects: An EU Experience , 2019, Animal Welfare.

[9]  J. Mather,et al.  Why Invertebrate Welfare? , 2019, Animal Welfare.

[10]  D. Scheel Octopuses in wild and domestic relationships , 2018, Social Science Information.

[11]  S. Wolfensohn,et al.  Assessment of Welfare in Zoo Animals: Towards Optimum Quality of Life , 2018, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[12]  C. O’BRIEN,et al.  The Current State of Cephalopod Science and Perspectives on the Most Critical Challenges Ahead From Three Early-Career Researchers , 2018, Front. Physiol..

[13]  P. Riordan,et al.  Adaptation of the animal welfare assessment grid (AWAG) for monitoring animal welfare in zoological collections , 2017, Veterinary Record.

[14]  Q. Fitzgibbon,et al.  Temperature dependent growth, feeding, nutritional condition and aerobic metabolism of juvenile spiny lobster, Sagmariasus verreauxi. , 2017, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology.

[15]  J. Pusenius,et al.  Is transport distance correlated with animal welfare and carcass quality of reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus)? , 2017, Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica.

[16]  G. Carder A preliminary investigation into the welfare of lobsters in the UK , 2017 .

[17]  S. Ward,et al.  Keeper-Animal Interactions: Differences between the Behaviour of Zoo Animals Affect Stockmanship , 2015, PloS one.

[18]  L. L. López Greco,et al.  Compensatory Growth in Juveniles of Freshwater Redclaw Crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus Reared at Three Different Temperatures: Hyperphagia and Food Efficiency as Primary Mechanisms , 2015, PloS one.

[19]  Daniel Osorio,et al.  Guidelines for the Care and Welfare of Cephalopods in Research –A consensus based on an initiative by CephRes, FELASA and the Boyd Group , 2015, Laboratory animals.

[20]  Joshua J. Smith Human–animal relationships in zoo‐housed orangutans (P. abelii) and gorillas (G. g. gorilla): The effects of familiarity , 2014, American journal of primatology.

[21]  A. Dunn,et al.  Size-dependent impacts of the endangered white-clawed crayfish (Austropotamobius pallipes) (Lereboullet) on the littoral community , 2013 .

[22]  H. Proctor Animal Sentience: Where are We and Where are We Heading? , 2012, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[23]  Karel Douda,et al.  The relationship between water quality and indigenous and alien crayfish distribution in the Czech Republic: patterns and conservation implications , 2012 .

[24]  S. Wells,et al.  A guide to defining and implementing protocols for the welfare assessment of laboratory animals: eleventh report of the BVAAWF/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW Joint Working Group on Refinement* , 2011, Laboratory animals.

[25]  D. Broom,et al.  Animal welfare: an aspect of care, sustainability, and food quality required by the public. , 2010, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[26]  K. Carlstead A comparative approach to the study of Keeper-Animal Relationships in the zoo. , 2009, Zoo biology.

[27]  R. Elwood,et al.  Pain and stress in crustaceans , 2009 .

[28]  B. Schmitz,et al.  Decapod crustacean chelipeds: an overview , 2000, Journal of Biosciences.

[29]  M. Meade,et al.  Toxicity of ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate to juvenile Australian crayfish, Cherax quadricarinatus , 1995 .

[30]  D. Broom The scientific assessment of animal welfare , 1988 .

[31]  C. Wood,et al.  Physiological Responses to Acid Stress in Crayfish (Orconectes): Haemolymph Ions, Acid–Base Status, and Exchanges with the Environment , 1986 .