Some Demonstrations of the Effects of Structural Descriptions in Mental Imagery

A visual imagery task is presented which is beyond the limits of normal human ability, and some of the factors contributing to its difficulty are isolated by comparing the difficulty of related tasks. It is argu~,cl that complex objects are assigned hierarchical structural descriptions by being parsed into parts, each of which has its own local system of significant directions. Two quite different schemas for a wire-frame cube are used to illustrate this theory, and some striking perceptual differences to which they give rise are described. The difficulty of certain mental imagery tasks is shown to depend on which of the alternative structural descriptions of an object is used, and this is interpreted as evidence that structural descriptions are an important component of mental images. Finally, it is argued that analog transformations like mental folding involve changing the values of continuous variables in a structural description.

[1]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Syntax-directed interpretation of classes of pictures , 1966, CACM.

[2]  F. Attneave.  Triangles as ambiguous figures. , 1968, The American journal of psychology.

[3]  Patrick Henry Winston,et al.  Learning structural descriptions from examples , 1970 .

[4]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[5]  George W. Baylor,et al.  Program and Protocol Analysis on a Mental Imagery Task , 1971, IJCAI.

[6]  M. B. Clowes,et al.  On Seeing Things , 1971, Artif. Intell..

[7]  E. Leeuwenberg.  A perceptual coding language for visual and auditory patterns. , 1971, The American journal of psychology.

[8]  R. Shepard,et al.  A chronometric study of mental paper folding , 1972 .

[9]  R. Shepard,et al.  CHRONOMETRIC STUDIES OF THE ROTATION OF MENTAL IMAGES , 1973 .

[10]  Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al.  What the Mind’s Eye Tells the Mind’s Brain: A Critique of Mental Imagery , 1973 .

[11]  Irvin Rock,et al.  Orientation and form , 1974 .

[12]  Kenneth J. Turner,et al.  Computer perception of curved objects using a television camera , 1974 .

[13]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Structural descriptions and the limitations of visual images* , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[15]  John M. Hollerbach,et al.  Hierarchical Shape Description of Objects by Selection and Modification of Prototypes , 1975 .

[16]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge" in the psychology of computer vision , 1975 .

[17]  L. Cooper.  Demonstration of a mental analog of an external rotation , 1976 .

[18]  G. Miller,et al.  Language and Perception , 1976 .

[19]  D. Perkins,et al.  How Good a Bet is Good Form? , 1976, Perception.

[20]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Imagery, propositions, and the form of internal representations , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  A. Paivio.  Images, Propositions, and Knowledge , 1977 .

[22]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Modeling Spatial Knowledge , 1978, IJCAI.

[23]  David Marr,et al.  Representing Visual Information , 1977 .

[24]  William G. Chase,et al.  Visual information processing. , 1977 .

[25]  S. Palmer.  Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  John R. Anderson.  Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. , 1978 .

[27]  R. Shepard,et al.  Functional representations common to visual perception and imagination. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[29]  Michael Shneier,et al.  Object representation and recognition in machine vision , 1979 .

[30]  S. Ullman.  The Interpretation of Visual Motion , 1979 .