Human behavioural genetics of cognitive abilities and disabilities

Although neither the genome nor the environment can be manipulated in research on human behaviour, some of the new tools of molecular genetics can be brought to bear on human behavioural disorders (e.g. cognitive disabilities) and quantitative traits (e.g. cognitive abilities). The inability to manipulate the human genome experimentally has had the positive effect of focusing attention on naturally occuring genetic variation responsible for behavioural differences among individuals in all their complex multifactorial splendour. Genes in such complex multiple‐gene systems are called quantitative trait loci (QTLs), which merge the two worlds of genetic research, quantitative genetics and molecular genetics. Although most genetic research on complex human behaviour has focused on severe mental disorders, cognitive abilities and disabilities may be even more immediately relevant to neuroscience. For example, verbal ability and spatial ability are two of the most heritable cognitive abilities, and reading disability is the first behavioural disability for which replicated QTL linkage has been found. The purpose of this essay is to provide an overview of the genetics of cognitive abilities and disabilities as an example of the impending merger of quantitative genetics and molecular genetics in QTL analysis of complex traits.

[1]  D. Selkoe,et al.  Alzheimer's Disease--Genotypes, Phenotype, and Treatments , 1997, Science.

[2]  R. Elston,et al.  A comparison of sib‐pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci , 1985, Genetic epidemiology.

[3]  N Risch,et al.  The Future of Genetic Studies of Complex Human Diseases , 1996, Science.

[4]  R. Plomin,et al.  Nature and Nurture During Middle Childhood , 1994 .

[5]  B Johansson,et al.  Substantial genetic influence on cognitive abilities in twins 80 or more years old. , 1997, Science.

[6]  Alcino J. Silva,et al.  Impaired spatial learning in alpha-calcium-calmodulin kinase II mutant mice. , 1992, Science.

[7]  D W Fulker,et al.  An improved multipoint sib-pair analysis of quantitative traits , 1996, Behavior genetics.

[8]  R. C. Johnson,et al.  Familial resemblance for specific cognitive abilities , 1979, Behavior genetics.

[9]  G. Mcclearn,et al.  A Quantitative Genetic Analysis of Cognitive Abilities during the Second Half of the Life Span , 1992 .

[10]  A. Mackinnon,et al.  Apolipoprotein E allele ∈4, dementia, and cognitive decline in a population sample , 1995, The Lancet.

[11]  R. Ebstein,et al.  Excess dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) exon III seven repeat allele in opioid-dependent subjects , 1997, Molecular Psychiatry.

[12]  J. Buxbaum,et al.  Linkage disequilibrium between an allele at the dopamine D4 receptor locus and Tourette syndrome, by the transmission-disequilibrium test. , 1996, American journal of human genetics.

[13]  J. Sutcliffe,et al.  Identification of a gene (FMR-1) containing a CGG repeat coincident with a breakpoint cluster region exhibiting length variation in fragile X syndrome , 1991, Cell.

[14]  G. Mcclearn,et al.  Allelic associations between 100 DNA markers and high versus low IQ , 1995 .

[15]  D W Fulker,et al.  Quantitative trait locus for reading disability on chromosome 6. , 1994, Science.

[16]  D. Fulker,et al.  Evidence for a genetic aetiology in reading disability of twins , 1987, Nature.

[17]  K. I. Blum,et al.  Impaired Hippocampal Representation of Space in CA1-Specific NMDAR1 Knockout Mice , 1996, Cell.

[18]  A. Serretti,et al.  Positive association of DRD4 exon 1 and 3 variants with major psychoses , 1996 .

[19]  J. Crabbe,et al.  Genetic animal models of alcohol and drug abuse. , 1994, Science.

[20]  E. Bowman,et al.  Depression and self-medication with nicotine: the modifying influence of the dopamine D4 receptor gene. , 1998, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[21]  K. Lesch,et al.  Association of Anxiety-Related Traits with a Polymorphism in the Serotonin Transporter Gene Regulatory Region , 1996, Science.

[22]  B K Suarez,et al.  A comparison of three affected-sib-pair scoring methods to detect HLA-linked disease susceptibility genes. , 1984, American journal of medical genetics.

[23]  D. Murphy,et al.  Population and familial association between the D4 dopamine receptor gene and measures of Novelty Seeking , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[24]  E. Feskens,et al.  Apolipoprotein e4 allele and cognitive decline in elderly men , 1994, BMJ.

[25]  M. Owen,et al.  The genetic basis of complex human behaviors. , 1994, Science.

[26]  E. Corder,et al.  Allelic association but only weak evidence for linkage to the apolipoprotein E locus in late-onset Swedish Alzheimer families. , 1996, American journal of medical genetics.

[27]  Mark Noble,et al.  LIM-kinase1 Hemizygosity Implicated in Impaired Visuospatial Constructive Cognition , 1996, Cell.

[28]  N L Segal,et al.  “Sources of Human Psychological Differences: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart” (1990), by , 2018 .

[29]  B A Lewis,et al.  A study of developmental speech and language disorders in twins. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[30]  R. Plomin,et al.  Nature, Nurture, and Cognitive Development from 1 to 16 Years: A Parent-Offspring Adoption Study , 1997 .

[31]  C Donlan,et al.  GENETIC BASIS OF SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENT: EVIDENCE FROM A TWIN STUDY , 1995, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[32]  J. Haines,et al.  Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer's disease in late onset families. , 1993, Science.

[33]  M. Alarcón,et al.  Genetics of specific reading disability , 1996 .

[34]  R. Ebstein,et al.  Dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) exon III polymorphism associated with the human personality trait of Novelty Seeking , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[35]  M. Rutter,et al.  Opportunities for psychiatry from genetic findings , 1997, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[36]  D. Fulker,et al.  Multiple regression analysis of twin data , 1985, Behavior genetics.