Home-field advantage affects the local adaptive interaction between Andropogon gerardii ecotypes and root-associated bacterial communities

ABSTRACT Due to climate change, drought frequencies and severities are predicted to increase across the United States. Plant responses and adaptation to stresses depend on plant genetic and environmental factors. Understanding the effect of those factors on plant performance is required to predict species’ responses to environmental change. We used reciprocal gardens planted with distinct regional ecotypes of the perennial grass Andropogon gerardii adapted to dry, mesic, and wet environments to characterize their rhizosphere communities using 16S rRNA metabarcode sequencing. Even though the local microbial pool was the main driver of these rhizosphere communities, the significant plant ecotypic effect highlighted active microbial recruitment in the rhizosphere, driven by ecotype or plant genetic background. Our data also suggest that ecotypes planted at their homesites were more successful in recruiting rhizosphere community members that were unique to the location. The link between the plants’ homesite and the specific local microbes supported the “home field advantage” hypothesis. The unique homesite microbes may represent microbial specialists that are linked to plant stress responses. Furthermore, our data support ecotypic variation in the recruitment of congeneric but distinct bacterial variants, highlighting the nuanced plant ecotype effects on rhizosphere microbiome recruitment. These results improve our understanding of the complex plant host–soil microbe interactions and should facilitate further studies focused on exploring the functional potential of recruited microbes. Our study has the potential to aid in predicting grassland ecosystem responses to climate change and impact restoration management practices to promote grassland sustainability. IMPORTANCE In this study, we used reciprocal gardens located across a steep precipitation gradient to characterize rhizosphere communities of distinct dry, mesic, and wet regional ecotypes of the perennial grass Andropogon gerardii. We used 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and focused oligotyping analysis and showed that even though location was the main driver of the microbial communities, ecotypes could potentially recruit distinct bacterial populations. We showed that different A. gerardii ecotypes were more successful in overall community recruitment and recruitment of microbes unique to the “home” environment, when growing at their “home site.” We found evidence for “home-field advantage” interactions between the host and host–root-associated bacterial communities, and the capability of ecotypes to recruit specialized microbes that were potentially linked to plant stress responses. Our study aids in a better understanding of the factors that affect plant adaptation, improve management strategies, and predict grassland function under the changing climate. In this study, we used reciprocal gardens located across a steep precipitation gradient to characterize rhizosphere communities of distinct dry, mesic, and wet regional ecotypes of the perennial grass Andropogon gerardii. We used 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and focused oligotyping analysis and showed that even though location was the main driver of the microbial communities, ecotypes could potentially recruit distinct bacterial populations. We showed that different A. gerardii ecotypes were more successful in overall community recruitment and recruitment of microbes unique to the “home” environment, when growing at their “home site.” We found evidence for “home-field advantage” interactions between the host and host–root-associated bacterial communities, and the capability of ecotypes to recruit specialized microbes that were potentially linked to plant stress responses. Our study aids in a better understanding of the factors that affect plant adaptation, improve management strategies, and predict grassland function under the changing climate.

[1]  P. Hogeweg,et al.  A social niche breadth score reveals niche range strategies of generalists and specialists , 2023, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[2]  Wenming Ma,et al.  Root exudates contribute to belowground ecosystem hotspots: A review , 2022, Frontiers in Microbiology.

[3]  B. Singh,et al.  Response of the plant core microbiome to Fusarium oxysporum infection and identification of the pathobiome , 2022, bioRxiv.

[4]  Yue Li,et al.  Emerging Function of Ecotype-Specific Splicing in the Recruitment of Commensal Microbiome , 2022, International journal of molecular sciences.

[5]  A. Jumpponen,et al.  Bacterial but Not Fungal Rhizosphere Community Composition Differ among Perennial Grass Ecotypes under Abiotic Environmental Stress , 2022, Microbiology spectrum.

[6]  S. Sleutel,et al.  Soil texture controls added organic matter mineralization by regulating soil moisture—evidence from a field experiment in a maritime climate , 2022, Geoderma.

[7]  Junjie Guo,et al.  Microbial generalists and specialists differently contribute to the community diversity in farmland soils , 2021, Journal of advanced research.

[8]  G. Newcombe,et al.  Editorial: Plant Microbiome: Interactions, Mechanisms of Action, and Applications , 2021, Frontiers in Microbiology.

[9]  N. Bello,et al.  Reciprocal transplant gardens as gold standard to detect local adaptation in grassland species: New opportunities moving into the 21st century , 2021, Journal of Ecology.

[10]  D. Wardle,et al.  Home-field advantage of litter decomposition: from the phyllosphere to the soil. , 2021, The New phytologist.

[11]  P. Hugenholtz,et al.  Metabolic flexibility allows bacterial habitat generalists to become dominant in a frequently disturbed ecosystem , 2021, The ISME Journal.

[12]  Yong-guan Zhu,et al.  Rare taxa maintain the stability of crop mycobiomes and ecosystem functions. , 2020, Environmental microbiology.

[13]  D. Hui,et al.  Site conditions interact with litter quality to affect home-field advantage and rhizosphere effect of litter decomposition in a subtropical wetland ecosystem. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  D. Wardle,et al.  Rhizosphere control of soil nitrogen cycling: a key component of plant economic strategies. , 2020, The New phytologist.

[15]  N. Bello,et al.  Adaptive genetic potential and plasticity of trait variation in the foundation prairie grass Andropogon gerardii across the US Great Plains’ climate gradient: Implications for climate change and restoration , 2020, Evolutionary applications.

[16]  Alice Risely,et al.  Applying the core microbiome to understand host-microbe systems. , 2020, The Journal of animal ecology.

[17]  Bryan C. Runck,et al.  The home field advantage of modern plant breeding , 2019, PloS one.

[18]  R. Irizarry ggplot2 , 2019, Introduction to Data Science.

[19]  E. Borer,et al.  Site‐specific responses of foliar fungal microbiomes to nutrient addition and herbivory at different spatial scales , 2019, Ecology and evolution.

[20]  S. Lebeis,et al.  Soil indigenous microbiome and plant genotypes cooperatively modify soybean rhizosphere microbiome assembly , 2019, BMC Microbiology.

[21]  William A. Walters,et al.  Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2 , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[22]  C. Schadt,et al.  Rhizosphere microbiomes diverge among Populus trichocarpa plant-host genotypes and chemotypes, but it depends on soil origin , 2019, Microbiome.

[23]  B. Henrissat,et al.  High intraspecific genome diversity in the model arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiont Rhizophagus irregularis. , 2018, The New phytologist.

[24]  S. Blanchet,et al.  The community and ecosystem consequences of intraspecific diversity: a meta-analysis , 2018, bioRxiv.

[25]  Y. Onoda,et al.  Publisher Correction: Core microbiomes for sustainable agroecosystems , 2018, Nature Plants.

[26]  Emmanuel Paradis,et al.  ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R , 2018, Bioinform..

[27]  Yiqi Luo,et al.  Response of soil microbial communities to altered precipitation: A global synthesis , 2018, Global Ecology and Biogeography.

[28]  Y. Onoda,et al.  Core microbiomes for sustainable agroecosystems , 2018, Nature Plants.

[29]  C. Pieterse,et al.  The Soil-Borne Legacy , 2018, Cell.

[30]  D. Guttman,et al.  Assembly and ecological function of the root microbiome across angiosperm plant species , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  D. Coleman-Derr,et al.  Drought Stress and Root-Associated Bacterial Communities , 2018, Front. Plant Sci..

[32]  R. White,et al.  Rhizosphere engineering: Enhancing sustainable plant ecosystem productivity , 2017 .

[33]  Yujie Cai,et al.  The rhizospheric microbial community structure and diversity of deciduous and evergreen forests in Taihu Lake area, China , 2017, PloS one.

[34]  Hanna Kokko,et al.  Can Evolution Supply What Ecology Demands? , 2017, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[35]  C. Morris,et al.  The Phyllosphere: Microbial Jungle at the Plant–Climate Interface , 2016 .

[36]  M. C. Wang,et al.  The importance of neutral and niche processes for bacterial community assembly differs between habitat generalists and specialists. , 2016, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[37]  P. Hunter Plant microbiomes and sustainable agriculture , 2016 .

[38]  Susanne Wurst,et al.  No evidence that plant–soil feedback effects of native and invasive plant species under glasshouse conditions are reflected in the field , 2016 .

[39]  S. Adl Rhizosphere, food security, and climate change: A critical role for plant-soil research , 2016 .

[40]  Paul J. McMurdie,et al.  DADA2: High resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data , 2016, Nature Methods.

[41]  L. Johnson,et al.  The role of ecotypic variation and the environment on biomass and nitrogen in a dominant prairie grass. , 2015, Ecology.

[42]  J. Vivanco,et al.  Linking Jasmonic Acid Signaling, Root Exudates, and Rhizosphere Microbiomes. , 2015, Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI.

[43]  Sur Herrera Paredes,et al.  Salicylic acid modulates colonization of the root microbiome by specific bacterial taxa , 2015, Science.

[44]  Nora M Bello,et al.  Intraspecific variation of a dominant grass and local adaptation in reciprocal garden communities along a US Great Plains’ precipitation gradient: implications for grassland restoration with climate change , 2015, Evolutionary applications.

[45]  C. Sorlini,et al.  Improved plant resistance to drought is promoted by the root-associated microbiome as a water stress-dependent trait. , 2015, Environmental microbiology.

[46]  K. Garrett,et al.  Ecotypes of an ecologically dominant prairie grass (Andropogon gerardii) exhibit genetic divergence across the U.S. Midwest grasslands' environmental gradient , 2014, Molecular ecology.

[47]  Angela C. Poole,et al.  Selection on soil microbiomes reveals reproducible impacts on plant function , 2014, The ISME Journal.

[48]  M. Sogin,et al.  Minimum entropy decomposition: Unsupervised oligotyping for sensitive partitioning of high-throughput marker gene sequences , 2014, The ISME Journal.

[49]  L. Johnson,et al.  A comparison of seasonal foliar chlorophyll change among ecotypes and cultivars of Andropogon gerardii (Poaceae) by using nondestructive and destructive methods , 2014, Photosynthetica.

[50]  Steven M. L. Smith Q&A: What are strigolactones and why are they important to plants and soil microbes? , 2014, BMC Biology.

[51]  M. V. D. van der Heijden,et al.  Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  Sharon L. Grim,et al.  Oligotyping: differentiating between closely related microbial taxa using 16S rRNA gene data , 2013, Methods in ecology and evolution.

[53]  James W. Jones,et al.  Tropical agricultural land management influences on soil microbial communities through its effect on soil organic carbon , 2013 .

[54]  L. Johnson,et al.  Environmental and genetic variation in leaf anatomy among populations of Andropogon gerardii (Poaceae) along a precipitation gradient. , 2013, American journal of botany.

[55]  P. Lemanceau,et al.  Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere , 2013, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[56]  Rodrigo Mendes,et al.  The rhizosphere microbiome: significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms. , 2013, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[57]  Susan Holmes,et al.  phyloseq: An R Package for Reproducible Interactive Analysis and Graphics of Microbiome Census Data , 2013, PloS one.

[58]  C. Sorlini,et al.  A Drought Resistance-Promoting Microbiome Is Selected by Root System under Desert Farming , 2012, PloS one.

[59]  C. Pieterse,et al.  Hormonal modulation of plant immunity. , 2012, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[60]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome , 2012, Nature.

[61]  M. Nilsson,et al.  Glasshouse vs field experiments: do they yield ecologically similar results for assessing N impacts on peat mosses? , 2012, The New phytologist.

[62]  Amilcare Porporato,et al.  Responses of soil microbial communities to water stress: results from a meta-analysis. , 2012, Ecology.

[63]  Nathaniel A. Brunsell,et al.  Timing of climate variability and grassland productivity , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  C. Schadt,et al.  Massively parallel rRNA gene sequencing exacerbates the potential for biased community diversity comparisons due to variable library sizes. , 2012, Environmental microbiology.

[65]  P. Bakker,et al.  Deciphering the Rhizosphere Microbiome for Disease-Suppressive Bacteria , 2011, Science.

[66]  Marcel Martin Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads , 2011 .

[67]  I. Schöning,et al.  Pyrosequencing-Based Assessment of Bacterial Community Structure Along Different Management Types in German Forest and Grassland Soils , 2011, PloS one.

[68]  Rob Knight,et al.  Soil bacterial diversity in the Arctic is not fundamentally different from that found in other biomes. , 2010, Environmental microbiology.

[69]  Safdar Ali,et al.  Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: a review , 2010, Annals of Microbiology.

[70]  Roey Angel,et al.  Soil Microbial Abundance and Diversity Along a Low Precipitation Gradient , 2010, Microbial Ecology.

[71]  Jerzy H. Czembor,et al.  Cereal landraces for sustainable agriculture. A review , 2010, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[72]  P. Legendre,et al.  Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. , 2009, Ecology.

[73]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[74]  T. Ryan Gregory,et al.  Understanding Natural Selection: Essential Concepts and Common Misconceptions , 2009, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[75]  Davey L. Jones,et al.  Carbon flow in the rhizosphere: carbon trading at the soil–root interface , 2009, Plant and Soil.

[76]  J. Zak,et al.  Soil Microbial Community Response to Drought and Precipitation Variability in the Chihuahuan Desert , 2009, Microbial Ecology.

[77]  David J. Gibson,et al.  Grasses and Grassland Ecology , 2009 .

[78]  C. Rahbek,et al.  Indicator taxa revisited: useful for conservation planning? , 2009 .

[79]  N. Ostle,et al.  Microbial contributions to climate change through carbon cycle feedbacks , 2008, The ISME Journal.

[80]  L. Forney,et al.  The tragedy of the uncommon: understanding limitations in the analysis of microbial diversity , 2008, The ISME Journal.

[81]  J. Tiedje,et al.  Naïve Bayesian Classifier for Rapid Assignment of rRNA Sequences into the New Bacterial Taxonomy , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[82]  T. Balser,et al.  Microbial stress-response physiology and its implications for ecosystem function. , 2007, Ecology.

[83]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. , 2007, Ecology.

[84]  Jonathan D. G. Jones,et al.  The plant immune system , 2006, Nature.

[85]  T. Vogel,et al.  Potential of a 16S rRNA-Based Taxonomic Microarray for Analyzing the Rhizosphere Effects of Maize on Agrobacterium spp. and Bacterial Communities , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[86]  R. De Wit,et al.  'Everything is everywhere, but, the environment selects'; what did Baas Becking and Beijerinck really say? , 2006, Environmental microbiology.

[87]  J. P. Morgan,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 2005, Technometrics.

[88]  D. Crowley,et al.  Development of specific rhizosphere bacterial communities in relation to plant species, nutrition and soil type , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[89]  K. Paustian,et al.  Measuring and understanding carbon storage in afforested soils by physical fractionation , 2002 .

[90]  H. Heuer,et al.  Bulk and Rhizosphere Soil Bacterial Communities Studied by Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis: Plant-Dependent Enrichment and Seasonal Shifts Revealed , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[91]  J. K. Koelliker,et al.  Frequency and Extent of Water Limitation to Primary Production in a Mesic Temperate Grassland , 2001, Ecosystems.

[92]  A. Knapp,et al.  Variation among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary production. , 2001, Science.

[93]  Howard E. Epstein,et al.  Regional productivities of plant species in the Great Plains of the United States , 1998, Plant Ecology.

[94]  J. Hassink,et al.  Effects of soil texture and structure on carbon and nitrogen mineralization in grassland soils , 1992, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[95]  W. Parton,et al.  Primary Production of the Central Grassland Region of the United States , 1988 .

[96]  R. Levins Theory of Fitness in a Heterogeneous Environment. I. The Fitness Set and Adaptive Function , 1962, The American Naturalist.

[97]  S. Kuester The Nature and Properties of Soils , 1953, Soil Science Society of America Journal.

[98]  Plant Microbiome: Interactions, Mechanisms of Action, and Applications , 2021, Frontiers Research Topics.

[99]  S. Langenheder,et al.  The importance of species sorting differs between habitat generalists and specialists in bacterial communities. , 2014, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[100]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[101]  M. Mazzola,et al.  Diversity and natural functions of antibiotics produced by beneficial and plant pathogenic bacteria. , 2012, Annual review of phytopathology.

[102]  G. Keppel Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook, 3rd ed. , 1991 .

[103]  T. Dejong,et al.  A comparison of three diversity indices based on their components of richness and evenness , 1975 .