Scale dependence in habitat selection: the case of the endangered brown bear (Ursus arctos) in the Cantabrian Range (NW Spain)

Animals select habitat resources at multiple spatial scales. Thus, explicit attention to scale dependency in species–habitat relationships is critical to understand the habitat suitability patterns as perceived by organisms in complex landscapes. Identification of the scales at which particular environmental variables influence habitat selection may be as important as the selection of variables themselves. In this study, we combined bivariate scaling and Maximum entropy (Maxent) modeling to investigate multiscale habitat selection of endangered brown bear (Ursus arctos) populations in northwest Spain. Bivariate scaling showed that the strength of apparent habitat relationships was highly sensitive to the scale at which predictor variables are evaluated. Maxent models on the optimal scale for each variable suggested that landscape composition together with human disturbances was dominant drivers of bear habitat selection, while habitat configuration and edge effects were substantially less influential. We found that explicitly optimizing the scale of habitat suitability models considerably improved single-scale modeling in terms of model performance and spatial prediction. We found that patterns of brown bear habitat suitability represent the cumulative influence of habitat selection across a broad range of scales, from local resources within habitat patches to the landscape composition at broader spatial scales.

[1]  Douglas H. Johnson THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCE , 1980 .

[2]  S. Cushman,et al.  Multi Scale Habitat Relationships of Martes americana in Northern Idaho, U.S.A , 2012 .

[3]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists , 2011 .

[4]  Kurt J. Jenkins Biology and Conservation of Martens, Sables, and Fishers: A New Synthesis , 2013 .

[5]  Francisco J. Purroy,et al.  Habitat assessment of a relict brown bear Ursus arctos population in northern Spain , 1997 .

[6]  J. A. Schaefer,et al.  Habitat selection as a hierarchy: the spatial scales of winter foraging by muskoxen , 1995 .

[7]  M. Proctor,et al.  ESTIMATING GRIZZLY BEAR DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE RELATIVE TO HABITAT AND HUMAN INFLUENCE , 2004 .

[8]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  ASSESSING THE RISK OF EXTINCTION FOR THE BROWN BEAR (URSUS ARCTOS) IN THE CORDILLERA CANTABRICA, SPAIN , 1998 .

[9]  J. Metzger,et al.  Using binary and probabilistic habitat availability indices derived from graph theory to model bird occurrence in fragmented forests , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[10]  A. Clevenger,et al.  Copulation of wild European brown bears (Ursus arctos), with comments on the breeding behaviour of the one adult male , 1992 .

[11]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .

[12]  F. Messier,et al.  Hierarchical habitat selection by woodland caribou: its relationship to limiting factors , 2000 .

[13]  L. Fahrig Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity , 2003 .

[14]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  Modelling distribution and abundance with presence‐only data , 2006 .

[15]  Joanna Grand,et al.  A Multiscale Landscape Approach to Predicting Bird and Moth Rarity Hotspots in a Threatened Pitch Pine–Scrub Oak Community , 2004 .

[16]  William J. Ripple,et al.  OLD-FOREST DISTRIBUTION AROUND SPOTTED OWL NESTS IN THE CENTRAL CASCADE MOUNTAINS, OREGON , 1999 .

[17]  Miroslav Dudík,et al.  Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation , 2008 .

[18]  S. Cushman,et al.  Inferring landscape effects on gene flow: a new model selection framework , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[19]  Miguel Delibes,et al.  Endangered Species Constrained by Natural and Human Factors: the Case of Brown Bears in Northern Spain , 2003 .

[20]  S. Levin The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[21]  Guillermo Palomero,et al.  Demografía, distribución, genética y conservación del oso pardo cantábrico , 2007 .

[22]  Pilar García,et al.  Detailed model of shelter areas for the Cantabrian brown bear , 2007, Ecol. Informatics.

[23]  Gordon B. Stenhouse,et al.  A habitat-based framework for grizzly bear conservation in Alberta , 2006 .

[24]  N. B. Kotliar,et al.  Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity , 1990 .

[25]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions , 2006 .

[26]  D. Huber,et al.  Movements of European brown bears in Croatia , 1993 .

[27]  Vítezslav Moudrý,et al.  Influence of positional accuracy, sample size and scale on modelling species distributions: a review , 2012, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[28]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Hierarchical, Multi-scale decomposition of species-environment relationships , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[29]  John Bell,et al.  A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models , 1997, Environmental Conservation.

[30]  Francisco J. Purroy,et al.  Brown bear (Ursus arctos L.) habitat use in the Cantabrian Mountains, Spain , 1992 .

[31]  Lee Belbin,et al.  Which environmental variables should I use in my biodiversity model? , 2012, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[32]  B. Mclellan,et al.  Relationships between Human Industrial Activity and Grizzly Bears , 1990 .

[33]  Fernando Ballesteros,et al.  Trends in Number and Distribution of Brown Bear Females with Cubs-of-the-year in the Cantabrian Mountains, Spain , 2007 .

[34]  Bonnie M. Blanchard,et al.  Grizzly bear: habitat relationships in the Yellowstone area , 1983 .

[35]  Jean Paul Metzger,et al.  Relative effects of fragment size and connectivity on bird community in the Atlantic Rain Forest: Implications for conservation , 2008 .

[36]  Jon E. Swenson,et al.  Home ranges in adult Scandinavian brown bears (Ursus arctos): effect of mass, sex, reproductive category, population density and habitat type , 2003 .

[37]  R. Macarthur The Problem of Pattern and Scale in Ecology: The Robert H. MacArthur Award Lecture , 2005 .

[38]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  The influence of research scale on bald eagle habitat selection along the lower Hudson River, New York (USA) , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[39]  Jean Paul Metzger,et al.  Isolation determines patterns of species presence in highly fragmented landscapes , 2011 .

[40]  Milan Koren,et al.  Habitat suitability modelling from non-point data: The case study of brown bear habitat in Slovakia , 2011, Ecol. Informatics.

[41]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data , 2006 .

[42]  Sandro Lovari,et al.  A habitat model for brown bear conservation and land use planning in the central Apennines , 2004 .

[43]  Andrew Ford,et al.  Pseudo-absences, pseudo-models and pseudo-niches: pitfalls of model selection based on the area under the curve , 2012, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[44]  William J. Zielinski,et al.  PREDICTING THE OCCURRENCE OF RARE MOLLUSKS IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA FORESTS , 2004 .

[45]  Arthur S. Lieberman,et al.  Landscape Ecology , 1994, Springer New York.