Quantitative functional failure analysis of a thermal-hydraulic passive system by means of bootstrapped Artificial Neural Networks

The estimation of the functional failure probability of a thermal-hydraulic (T-H) passive system can be done by Monte Carlo (MC) sampling of the epistemic uncertainties affecting the system model and the numerical values of its parameters, followed by the computation of the system response by a mechanistic T-H code, for each sample. The computational effort associated to this approach can be prohibitive because a large number of lengthy T-H code simulations must be performed (one for each sample) for accurate quantification of the functional failure probability and the related statistics. In this paper, the computational burden is reduced by replacing the long-running, original T-H code by a fast-running, empirical regression model: in particular, an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model is considered. It is constructed on the basis of a limited-size set of data representing examples of the input/output nonlinear relationships underlying the original T-H code; once the model is built, it is used for performing, in an acceptable computational time, the numerous system response calculations needed for an accurate failure probability estimation, uncertainty propagation and sensitivity analysis. The empirical approximation of the system response provided by the ANN model introduces an additional source of (model) uncertainty, which needs to be evaluated and accounted for. A bootstrapped ensemble of ANN regression models is here built for quantifying, in terms of confidence intervals, the (model) uncertainties associated with the estimates provided by the ANNs. For demonstration purposes, an application to the functional failure analysis of an emergency passive decay heat removal system in a simple steady-state model of a Gas-cooled Fast Reactor (GFR) is presented. The functional failure probability of the system is estimated together with global Sobol sensitivity indices. The bootstrapped ANN regression model built with low computational time on few (e.g., 100) data examples is shown capable of providing reliable (very near to the true values of the quantities of interest) and robust (the confidence intervals are satisfactorily narrow around the true values of the quantities of interest) point estimates.

[1]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings , 2009 .

[3]  M. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Integration of functional reliability analysis with hardware reliability: An application to safety grade decay heat removal system of Indian 500 MWe PFBR , 2009 .

[4]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Estimation of the Functional Failure Probability of a Thermal Hydraulic Passive System by Subset Simulation , 2009 .

[5]  George E. Apostolakis,et al.  Risk-Informed Design Changes in a Passive Decay Heat Removal System , 2008 .

[6]  Shuangzhe Liu,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer by Andrea Saltelli, Marco Ratto, Terry Andres, Francesca Campolongo, Jessica Cariboni, Debora Gatelli, Michaela Saisana, Stefano Tarantola , 2008 .

[7]  Luciano Burgazzi State of the art in reliability of thermal-hydraulic passive systems , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  James L. Beck,et al.  SUBSET SIMULATION AND ITS APPLICATION TO SEISMIC RISK BASED ON DYNAMIC ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[9]  Halbert White,et al.  Bootstrapping Confidence Intervals for Clinical Input Variable Effects in a Network Trained to Identify the Presence of Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1995, Neural Computation.

[10]  E. Zio,et al.  A study of the bootstrap method for estimating the accuracy of artificial neural networks in predicting nuclear transient processes , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[11]  George E. Apostolakis,et al.  Incorporating reliability analysis into the design of passive cooling systems with an application to a gas-cooled reactor , 2008 .

[12]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[13]  Lénárd Pál,et al.  Best estimate method and safety analysis II , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of nonparametric regression procedures for sensitivity analysis of computationally demanding models , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  C. Bassi,et al.  Reliability Assessment of 2400 MWth Gas-Cooled Fast Reactor Natural Circulation Decay Heat Removal in Pressurized Situations , 2008 .

[16]  M. G. Marietta,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis results obtained in the 1992 performance assessment for the waste isolation pilot plant , 1996 .

[17]  Attila Guba,et al.  Statistical aspects of best estimate method - I , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Neural networks for pattern recognition , 1995 .

[19]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Quantifying uncertainties in the estimation of safety parameters by using bootstrapped artificial neural networks , 2008 .

[20]  S. S. Wilks Statistical Prediction with Special Reference to the Problem of Tolerance Limits , 1942 .

[21]  Harvey M. Wagner,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis , 1995, Oper. Res..

[22]  Pedro G. Coelho,et al.  Structural reliability analysis using Monte Carlo simulation and neural networks , 2008, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[23]  John Cleveland,et al.  Natural Circulation in Nuclear Reactor Systems , 2008 .

[24]  A. John Arul,et al.  Functional reliability analysis of Safety Grade Decay Heat Removal System of Indian 500 MWe PFBR , 2008 .

[25]  G. I. Schuëller,et al.  On the treatment of uncertainties in structural mechanics and analysis , 2007 .

[26]  Ricardo O. Foschi,et al.  Performance-based design and seismic reliability analysis using designed experiments and neural networks , 2004 .

[27]  G. Apostolakis The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems. , 1990, Science.

[28]  G. Schuëller,et al.  Chair of Engineering Mechanics Ifm-publication 2-374 a Critical Appraisal of Reliability Estimation Procedures for High Dimensions , 2022 .

[29]  Enrico Zio,et al.  A model based on bootstrapped neural networks for computing the maximum fuel cladding temperature in an Rmbk-1500 nuclear reactor accident , 2008 .

[30]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Two methods for the structured assessment of model uncertainty by experts in performance assessments of radioactive waste repositories , 1996 .

[31]  Olivier Roustant,et al.  Calculations of Sobol indices for the Gaussian process metamodel , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[32]  Francesco Saverio D'Auria,et al.  Reliability evaluation of a natural circulation system , 2003 .

[33]  Vicki L. Sauter,et al.  Implementation and Evaluation , 2011 .

[34]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Alternative representations of epistemic uncertainty , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[35]  L. Burgazzi Reliability Evaluation of Passive Systems Through Functional Reliability Assessment , 2003 .

[36]  Gérard Dreyfus,et al.  Towards the Optimal Design of Numerical Experiments , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[37]  A. John Arul,et al.  Adjoint operator approach to functional reliability analysis of passive fluid dynamical systems , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[38]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Importance Assessment , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[39]  Andrej Prošek,et al.  Success criteria time windows of operator actions using RELAP5/MOD3.3 within human reliability analysis , 2008 .

[40]  Keh-Han Wang,et al.  Flexible Porous Wave Barrier for Enhanced Wetlands Habitat Restoration , 2003 .

[41]  D. Cacuci,et al.  A Comparative Review of Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of Large-Scale Systems—II: Statistical Methods , 2004 .

[42]  Henri P. Gavin,et al.  High-order limit state functions in the response surface method for structural reliability analysis , 2008 .

[43]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices , 2002 .

[44]  Helmut J. Pradlwarter,et al.  Chair of Engineering Mechanics Ifm-publication 2-380 Realistic and Efficient Reliability Estimation for Aerospace Structures , 2022 .

[45]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Functional failure analysis of a thermal-hydraulic passive system by means of Line Sampling , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[46]  Qiusheng Li,et al.  A new artificial neural network-based response surface method for structural reliability analysis , 2008 .

[47]  Susan A. Murphy,et al.  Monographs on statistics and applied probability , 1990 .

[48]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .

[49]  Neil E. Todreas,et al.  Reliability analysis of a passive cooling system using a response surface with an application to the Flexible Conversion Ratio Reactor , 2009 .

[50]  Jian Deng,et al.  Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance function using radial basis function network , 2006 .

[51]  Graham B. Wallis,et al.  Evaluation of nuclear safety from the outputs of computer codes in the presence of uncertainties , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[52]  A. Introduction,et al.  AN APPROACH FOR USING PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT IN RISK-INFORMED DECISIONS ON PLANT- SPECIFIC CHANGES TO THE LICENSING BASIS , 2009 .

[53]  J. Beck,et al.  Estimation of Small Failure Probabilities in High Dimensions by Subset Simulation , 2001 .

[54]  Jorge E. Hurtado,et al.  Filtered importance sampling with support vector margin: A powerful method for structural reliability analysis , 2007 .

[55]  George E. Apostolakis,et al.  The Impact of Uncertainties on the Performance of Passive Systems , 2005 .

[56]  B. Iooss,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis for a numerical model of radionuclide migration from the RRC “Kurchatov Institute” radwaste disposal site , 2008 .

[57]  F. D'Auria,et al.  Methodology for the reliability evaluation of a passive system and its integration into a Probabilistic Safety Assessment , 2005 .

[58]  Thomas Most,et al.  A comparison of approximate response functions in structural reliability analysis , 2008 .