Self‐organisation in streams: the relationship between movement behaviour and body condition in a headwater salamander

SUMMARY 1. When movement behaviour is correlated with traits affecting fitness, it may affect population performance directly, independent of extrinsic habitat conditions. 2. In a previous 3-year, capture–recapture study, upstream movement by the salamander Gyrinophilus porphyriticus compensated for low reproduction in the upper 500 m of Merrill Brook, a first-order stream in northern New Hampshire (U.S.A.). This immigrant subsidy resulted from excess reproduction in the downstream section (i.e. the lower 500 m of stream length) and from consistently upstream-biased movement by salamanders. Reproduction in the two stream sections was positively correlated with mean body condition. Using 6 years of capture–recapture data, this study examines whether the movement behaviour of G. porphyriticus is related to body condition and thereby directly influences mean body condition and reproduction in the two sections of Merrill Brook. 3. Upstream-biased movement and greater mean body condition in the downstream section were consistent across 6 years of data collection. In Merrill Brook and four other streams, however, individuals with high body condition were more likely to move upstream and low-condition individuals were more likely to move downstream. Movement direction was unrelated to the size, sex and initial location of individuals. Body condition was positively related to growth rate, further supporting its link to reproductive potential, and positively autocorrelated through time in individuals that moved. 4. Results of this 6-year study suggest that the movement behaviour of G. porphyriticus partially compensated for environmental factors differentiating mean body condition and reproduction along Merrill Brook and illustrate the potential for this form of selforganisation to occur in linear habitats such as streams and rivers.

[1]  G. K. Noble The Biology of the Amphibia , 1954 .

[2]  S WRIGHT,et al.  Genetical structure of populations. , 1950, Nature.

[3]  Bm Kerby,et al.  Factors influencing invertebrate drift in small forest streams, south-eastern Queensland , 1995 .

[4]  S. C. Bishop,et al.  The Salamanders of New York , 1943 .

[5]  R. Holt Population dynamics in two-patch environments: Some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution , 1985 .

[6]  W. Lowe LINKING DISPERSAL TO LOCAL POPULATION DYNAMICS: A CASE STUDY USING A HEADWATER SALAMANDER SYSTEM , 2003 .

[7]  W. Heyer,et al.  Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. , 1995 .

[8]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[9]  J. Sadler,et al.  Condition-dependent dispersal of a patchily distributed riparian ground beetle in response to disturbance , 2006, Oecologia.

[10]  W. Fagan CONNECTIVITY, FRAGMENTATION, AND EXTINCTION RISK IN DENDRITIC METAPOPULATIONS , 2002 .

[11]  G. Likens,et al.  Stable isotopes identify dispersal patterns of stonefly populations living along stream corridors , 2005 .

[12]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  Biogeochemistry of a Forested Ecosystem , 1978, Springer New York.

[13]  G. Likens,et al.  Linking direct and indirect data on dispersal: isolation by slope in a headwater stream salamander. , 2006, Ecology.

[14]  M. McPeek,et al.  The Evolution of Dispersal in Spatially and Temporally Varying Environments , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[15]  J. Petranka,et al.  Salamanders of the United States and Canada , 1998 .

[16]  G. Uetz,et al.  Estimating fitness : a comparison of body condition indices , 1996 .

[17]  Kyle J. Haynes,et al.  SPIDER EFFECTS ON PLANTHOPPER MORTALITY, DISPERSAL, AND SPATIAL POPULATION DYNAMICS , 2004 .

[18]  R. Arditi,et al.  Clustering due to Acceleration in the Response to Population Gradient: A Simple Self‐Organization Model , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[19]  B. Anholt,et al.  DENSITY DEPENDENCE RESOLVES THE STREAM DRIFT PARADOX , 1995 .

[20]  G. Likens,et al.  Contradictory results from different methods for measuring direction of insect flight , 2004 .

[21]  M. Massot,et al.  Condition‐dependent dispersal and ontogeny of the dispersal behaviour: an experimental approach , 2002 .

[22]  S. M. Deban,et al.  Metamorphosis and evolution of feeding behaviour in salamanders of the family Plethodontidae , 2002 .

[23]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Complex interactions between dispersal and dynamics: Lessons from coupled logistic equations , 1993 .

[24]  K. Müller,et al.  The colonization cycle of freshwater insects , 1982, Oecologia.

[25]  Mark A. McPeek,et al.  Chaotic Population Dynamics Favors the Evolution of Dispersal , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[26]  I. Schlosser Fish recruitment, dispersal, and trophic interactions in a heterogeneous lotic environment , 1998, Oecologia.

[27]  J. Merilä Genetic variation in offspring condition : an experiment , 1996 .

[28]  M A Lewis,et al.  Persistence, spread and the drift paradox. , 2005, Theoretical population biology.

[29]  R. Bruce ECOLOGICAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE SALAMANDERS GYRINOPHILUS AND PSEUDOTRITON IN A SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN WATERSHED , 2003 .

[30]  R. Degraaf,et al.  Herpetofaunal species composition and relative abundance among three New England forest types , 1990 .

[31]  G. Hickling,et al.  RESTITUTION OF MASS–SIZE RESIDUALS: VALIDATING BODY CONDITION INDICES , 2005 .

[32]  Ran Nathan,et al.  The challenges of studying dispersal , 2001 .

[33]  C. Pringle HYDROLOGIC CONNECTIVITY AND THE MANAGEMENT OF BIOLOGICAL RESERVES: A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[34]  A. Green MASS/LENGTH RESIDUALS: MEASURES OF BODY CONDITION OR GENERATORS OF SPURIOUS RESULTS? , 2001 .

[35]  A. Sheldon,et al.  Genetic structure of the stonefly, Yoraperla brevis, populations: the extent of gene flow among adjacent montane streams , 1999 .

[36]  M. Rohlfs,et al.  Aggregative egg distributions may promote species co-existence - but why do they exist? , 2001 .

[37]  G. Likens,et al.  Forest structure and stream salamander diets: Implications for terrestrial-aquatic connectivity , 2005 .

[38]  W. Gabriel,et al.  Exact compensation of stream drift as an evolutionarily stable strategy , 2001 .

[39]  J. F. Gilliam,et al.  Explaining Leptokurtic Movement Distributions: Intrapopulation Variation in Boldness and Exploration , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[40]  E. Ranta,et al.  Self–organized dynamics in spatially structured populations , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  J. F. Gilliam,et al.  MODELING DIFFUSIVE SPREAD IN A HETEROGENEOUS POPULATION: A MOVEMENT STUDY WITH STREAM FISH , 2000 .

[42]  C. Patrick Doncaster,et al.  Balanced Dispersal Between Spatially Varying Local Populations: An Alternative To The Source‐Sink Model , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[43]  WINSOR H. LOWE,et al.  Landscape-Scale Spatial Population Dynamics in Human-Impacted Stream Systems , 2002, Environmental management.

[44]  Y. Taniguchi,et al.  CONDITION‐SPECIFIC COMPETITION: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ALTITUDINAL DISTRIBUTION OF STREAM FISHES , 2000 .

[45]  R. Bruce Variation in the Life Cycle of the Salamander Gyrinophilus porphyriticus , 2008 .

[46]  C. Caudill EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FOR NONSELECTIVE RECRUITMENT AND A SOURCE–SINK DYNAMIC IN A MAYFLY METAPOPULATION , 2003 .

[47]  MARY E. POWER,et al.  Linking Scales in Stream Ecology , 2006 .

[48]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Self-Organization in Biological Systems , 2001, Princeton studies in complexity.

[49]  N. Huntly,et al.  Habitat-specific demography: evidence for source-sink population structure in a mammal, the pika , 2003, Oecologia.

[50]  A. Sih,et al.  GENE FLOW AND INEFFECTIVE ANTIPREDATOR BEHAVIOR IN A STREAM‐BREEDING SALAMANDER , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[51]  R. Bruce A MODEL OF THE LARVAL PERIOD OF THE SPRING SALAMANDER, GYRINOPHILUS PORPHYRITICUS, BASED ON SIZE-FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS , 1980 .

[52]  H. B. Wilson The evolution of dispersal from source to sink populations , 2001 .

[53]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution , 1997 .

[54]  K. Fausch,et al.  Upstream movement by nonnative brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) promotes invasion of native cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki) habitat , 2003 .

[55]  Daniel R. Miller,et al.  The Network Dynamics Hypothesis: How Channel Networks Structure Riverine Habitats , 2004 .

[56]  William Gurney,et al.  POPULATION PERSISTENCE IN RIVERS AND ESTUARIES , 2001 .

[57]  Th. Dobshansky Genetical structure of natural populations. , 1948 .

[58]  J. Lindström,et al.  Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[59]  Alan R. Johnson,et al.  Phenotypic correlates of post-fledging dispersal in a population of greater flamingos: the importance of body condition , 2003 .

[60]  Seasonal variations in acid‐neutralizing capacity in 13 northeast United States headwater streams , 1997 .