Improved visualization of coronary arteries using a new three-dimensional submillimeter MR coronary angiography sequence with balanced gradients.

OBJECTIVE The goal of our study was to evaluate a new three-dimensional real-time navigator MR coronary angiography sequence to noninvasively visualize the coronary arteries. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Fifteen healthy volunteers underwent MR coronary angiography with a new balanced turbo field-echo sequence in comparison with the standard turbo field-echo sequence. Signal-to-noise, blood-to-myocardium, blood-to-fat, and blood-to-pericardial fluid contrast ratios of the left and right coronary artery systems were measured. Image quality was graded, the length and diameter of the coronary arteries were measured, and the number of visible side branches was assessed. RESULTS The balanced turbo field-echo images yielded a higher blood-to-myocardium and blood-to-pericardial fluid contrast ratio, a similar blood-to-fat contrast ratio, and a lower signal-to-noise ratio than the turbo field-echo images. On a 5-point grading scale (1, nondiagnostic or unreadable; 2, poor; 3, moderate; 4, good; 5, excellent), image quality was rated significantly better for the balanced turbo field-echo sequence than for the turbo field-echo sequence (left coronary artery, 4.0 +/- 0.6 vs 3.6 +/- 0.5 [p = 0.015]; right coronary artery, 4.4 +/- 0.4 vs 3.6 +/- 0.4 [p < 0.0001], respectively), resulting in a significantly longer segment of the three major coronary arteries visualized (left anterior descending coronary artery, 92 +/- 21 mm vs 79 +/- 24 mm; left circumflex coronary artery, 70 +/- 7 mm vs 60 +/- 18 mm; right coronary artery, 112 +/- 28 mm vs 95 +/- 27 mm) and a significantly higher number of side branches visualized (left anterior descending coronary artery, 2.9 +/- 1.3 vs 1.5 +/- 1.3; left circumflex coronary artery, 2.1 +/- 1.7 vs 1.0 +/- 1.2; right coronary artery, 3.7 +/- 1.7 vs 2.6 +/- 1.5). Mean imaging time per coronary artery was significantly shorter for the balanced turbo field-echo sequence (5.7 +/- 1.0 min) than for the turbo field-echo sequence (8.4 +/- 1.4 min) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Compared with standard turbo field-echo MR coronary angiography, optimized balanced turbo field-echo MR coronary angiography improves the visualization of the coronary arteries and their side branches within a significantly shorter imaging time.

[1]  R. Henkelman.  Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images. , 1985, Medical physics.

[2]  E M Haacke,et al.  Coronary arteries: three-dimensional MR imaging with fat saturation and magnetization transfer contrast. , 1993, Radiology.

[3]  A. Duerinckx,et al.  Two-dimensional coronary MR angiography: analysis of initial clinical results. , 1994, Radiology.

[4]  R R Edelman,et al.  Single breath‐hold volumetric imaging of the heart using magnetization‐prepared 3‐dimensional segmented echo planar imaging , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  J. Bronzwaer,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography of anomalous coronary arteries. A new gold standard for delineating the proximal course? , 1995, Circulation.

[6]  Albert Macovski,et al.  Coronary Angiography with Magnetization‐Prepared T2 Contrast , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  R. Edelman,et al.  Magnetic resonance coronary angiography in heart transplant recipients. , 1996, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[8]  M. Yacoub,et al.  Magnetic resonance coronary angiography in heart transplant recipients , 1996, Coronary artery disease.

[9]  F R Gutierrez,et al.  Coronary arteries: three-dimensional MR imaging with retrospective respiratory gating. , 1996, Radiology.

[10]  J. Jukema,et al.  Value of fast gradient echo magnetic resonance angiography as an adjunct to coronary arteriography in detecting and confirming the course of clinically significant coronary artery anomalies. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  P J de Feyter,et al.  Breath-hold coronary MR angiography with volume-targeted imaging. , 1998, Radiology.

[12]  C. Lorenz,et al.  High-resolution magnetic resonance coronary angiography of the entire heart using a new blood-pool agent, NC100150 injection: comparison with invasive x-ray angiography in pigs. , 1999, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[13]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Relationship between motion of coronary arteries and diaphragm during free breathing: lessons from real-time MR imaging. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Submillimeter three-dimensional coronary MR angiography with real-time navigator correction: comparison of navigator locations. , 1999, Radiology.

[15]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Improved coronary artery definition with T2-weighted, free-breathing, three-dimensional coronary MRA. , 1999, Circulation.

[16]  C. Higgins,et al.  Blood pool MR contrast agents for cardiovascular imaging , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  P. V. van Ooijen,et al.  MR coronary angiography with breath-hold targeted volumes: preliminary clinical results. , 2000, Radiology.

[18]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Cardiac real‐time imaging using SENSE , 2000 .

[19]  M. McConnell,et al.  Clinical role of coronary magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of anomalous coronary arteries. , 2000, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[20]  D. Pennell,et al.  A comparison between segmented k‐space FLASH and interleaved spiral MR coronary angiography sequences , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  J. Debatin,et al.  MR evaluation of ventricular function: true fast imaging with steady-state precession versus fast low-angle shot cine MR imaging: feasibility study. , 2001, Radiology.

[22]  P. Wielopolski,et al.  Coronary arteries: magnetization-prepared contrast-enhanced three-dimensional volume-targeted breath-hold MR angiography. , 2001, Radiology.

[23]  J S Lewin,et al.  Segmented k-space and real-time cardiac cine MR imaging with radial trajectories. , 2001, Radiology.

[24]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  E. Fleck,et al.  Functional cardiac MR imaging with steady‐state free precession (SSFP) significantly improves endocardial border delineation without contrast agents , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[26]  P Börnert,et al.  Improved 3D spiral imaging for coronary MR angiography , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  H. Vetter,et al.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of mammary artery grafts after minimally invasive coronary bypass surgery. , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[28]  Werner Moshage,et al.  Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses by Contrast-Enhanced, Retrospectively Electrocardiographically-Gated, Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography , 2001, Circulation.

[29]  René M. Botnar,et al.  3D coronary vessel wall imaging utilizing a local inversion technique with spiral image acquisition , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  A. Duerinckx.  Imaging of Coronary Artery Disease—MR , 2001, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[31]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Quantitative parameters of image quality in multidetector spiral computed tomographic coronary imaging with submillimeter collimation. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[32]  F. Sardanelli,et al.  Value of navigator echo magnetic resonance angiography in detecting occlusion/patency of arterial and venous, single and sequential coronary bypass grafts , 2000, The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging.