From a toy model to a complete weighted voting system

We investigate systems of indirect voting based on the law of Penrose, in which each representative in the voting body receives the number of votes (voting weight) proportional to the square root of the population he or she represents. For a generic population distribution the quota required for the qualified majority can be set in such a way that the voting power of any state is proportional to its weight. For a specific distribution of population the optimal quota has to be computed numerically. We analyse a toy voting model for which the optimal quota can be estimated analytically as a function of the number of members of the voting body. This result, combined with the normal approximation technique, allows us to design a simple, efficient, and flexible voting system which can be easily adopted for varying weights and number of players.

[1]  A. Hirschman National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade , 2024 .

[2]  Dominique Lepelley,et al.  On the voting power of an alliance and the subsequent power of its members , 2007, Soc. Choice Welf..

[3]  Annick Laruelle,et al.  Inequality among EU citizens in the EU's Council decision procedure , 2002 .

[4]  Jesús Mario Bilbao,et al.  The distribution of power in the European Constitution , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Dan S. Felsenthal,et al.  A Priori Voting Power: What is it All about? , 2004 .

[6]  Ines Lindner,et al.  Power Measures in Large Weighted Voting Games - Asymptotic Properties and Numerical Methods , 2004 .

[7]  L. Penrose The Elementary Statistics of Majority Voting , 1946 .

[8]  D. Felsenthal,et al.  The Measurement of Voting Power: Theory and Practice, Problems and Paradoxes , 1998 .

[9]  D. Felsenthal,et al.  Enlargement of the EU and weighted voting in its council of ministers , 2000 .

[10]  Běla Plechanovová Draft constitution and the decision-making rule for the Council of Ministers of the EU Looking for alternative solution , 2004 .

[11]  Axel Moberg,et al.  The Nice Treaty and Voting Rules in the Council , 2002 .

[12]  Draft Constitution and the IGC : Voting can be Simple and Efficient – without introducing the Massive Transfer of Power implied by the Convention ’ s Double Majority Proposal Institute for Advanced Studies , Vienna , December 2003 , 2003 .

[13]  Mika Widgrén,et al.  Power in the Design of Constitutional Rules , 2003 .

[14]  G. Owen Multilinear extensions and the banzhaf value , 1975 .

[15]  Moshé Machover,et al.  The Nice Treaty and Voting Rules in the Council: A Reply to Moberg (2002) , 2004 .

[16]  Mika Widgrén Enlargements and the Principles of Designing EU - Decision-Making Procedures , 2003 .

[18]  D. Felsenthal,et al.  Qualified Majority Voting Explained , 2004 .

[19]  B. Grofman,et al.  The Laakso-Taagepera Index in A Mean and Variance Framework , 2007 .

[20]  Vincent C. H. Chua,et al.  L S Penrose's limit theorem: Tests by simulation , 2006, Math. Soc. Sci..

[21]  Dennis Leech,et al.  Computing Power Indices for Large Voting Games , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Lancelot Hogben,et al.  On the Objective Study of Crowd Behaviour , 1952 .

[23]  M. Hosli,et al.  National Representation in International Organizations: The Seat Allocation Model Implicit in the European Union Council and Parliament , 2006 .

[24]  Moshé Machover,et al.  L.S. Penrose's limit theorem: proof of some special cases , 2004, Math. Soc. Sci..

[25]  Wojciech Slomczynski,et al.  Voting in the European Union: The square root system of Penrose and a critical point , 2004 .

[26]  A. Laruelle,et al.  Is the allocation of voting power among EU states fair? , 1998 .

[27]  Frédéric Bobay Constitution européenne : redistribution du pouvoir des États au Conseil de l'UE , 2004 .

[28]  Wojciech Slomczynski,et al.  Penrose voting system and optimal quota , 2006 .

[29]  Samuel Merrill Approximations to the Banzhaf Index of Voting Power , 1982 .

[30]  O. C. Herfindahl Concentration in the steel industry , 1950 .

[31]  M. Hosli Smaller States and the New Voting Weights in the Council , 2000 .

[32]  Dan S. Felsenthal,et al.  The Treaty of Nice and qualified majority voting , 2001, Soc. Choice Welf..