Assistive devices and distributed processes: reflections on activity systems and impairments

The article is based on an empirical research project involving persons with visual and hearing impairments and their use of assistive devices. The aim of the article is to develop a sociological understanding of the nature of assistive devices as impairments and disabilities are enacted within different everyday settings and mediated by tools and artefacts. Assistive devices include physical equipment, chemicals, animals, other persons, groups or organizations. They belong to different kinds that work at different levels of concreteness. The assistive devices mediate between the impaired body in the lived as well as the objective sense, and the material and socio-cultural environment through processes and types of activity. This takes place through what we term distributed physical and cognitive processes. These processes are constitutive for the practical understanding of assistive devices, impaired bodies and surroundings.

[1]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[2]  S. Gregory.  Living with chronic illness in the family setting. , 2005, Sociology of health & illness.

[3]  I. Hacking.  The Social Construction of What , 1999 .

[4]  C. Shilling.  The body in culture, technology and society , 2004 .

[5]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[6]  A. N. Leont’ev.  The Problem of Activity in Psychology , 1974 .

[7]  S. Levinson.  Activity types and language , 1979, Linguistics.

[8]  H. Dreyfus,et al.  Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time. , 1990 .

[9]  M. Heidegger.  The question concerning technology , 2024, East Asian Journal of Philosophy.

[10]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  The social organization of distributed cognition , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[11]  Mairian Corker,et al.  Disability/postmodernity : embodying disability theory , 2002 .

[12]  Alan D. Sokal,et al.  Beyond the Hoax: Science, Philosophy and Culture , 2008 .

[13]  Robert A. Wilson,et al.  Boundaries of the Mind: The Individual in the Fragile Sciences , 2004 .

[14]  R. F. Murphy.  The Body Silent , 1987 .

[15]  R. D'Andrade.  The Development of Cognitive Anthropology , 1995 .

[16]  Jeffery D. Higginbotham,et al.  Design Meets Disability , 2009 .

[17]  Carol Thomas.  Sociologies of Disability and Illness , 2007 .

[18]  G. Bateson,et al.  Mind and Nature , 1980 .

[19]  Lucy Suchman.  Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[20]  Trevor R. Parmenter,et al.  Disability/postmodernity: embodying disability theory . M. Corker & T. Shakespeare (Eds). London: Continuum. 2002. , 2004 .

[21]  E. Hutchins.  Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[22]  Kari Wærness,et al.  The Rationality of Caring , 1984 .

[23]  D. Norman.  The psychology of everyday things , 1990 .

[24]  Carol Wolkowitz.  Bodies at Work , 2006 .

[25]  P. Berger,et al.  Social Construction of Reality , 1991, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[26]  A. Clark,et al.  Books , 2004, INTR.

[27]  Maurice Merleau-Ponty.  Phenomenology of Perception , 1964 .

[28]  N. Crossley.  Body Techniques, Agency and Intercorporeality: On Goffman's Relations in Public , 1995 .

[29]  A. Clark.  Supersizing the Mind , 2008 .

[30]  A. Schutz,et al.  The well-informed citizen; an essay on the social distribution of knowledge. , 1946, Social research.

[31]  J. Dewey,et al.  How We Think , 2009 .

[32]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  G. Fauconnier,et al.  The Way We Think , 2002 .

[34]  R. Elema,et al.  The art of touching: The culture of 'body work' in nursing , 2001 .