Decision Fusion of Circulating Markers for Breast Cancer Detection in Premenopausal Women

Current mammographic screening for breast cancer is less effective for younger women. To complement mammography for premenopausal women, we investigated the feasibility screening test using 98 blood serum proteins. Because the data set was very noisy and contained only weak features, we used a classifier designed for noisy data: decision fusion. Decision fusion outperformed both a support vector machine (SVM) and linear regression with forward stepwise feature selection on all three two-class classification tasks: normal tissue vs. cancer, normal tissue vs. benign lesions, and benign lesions vs. cancer. Decision fusion detected cancer moderately well (AUC=0.84 on normal vs. cancer), demonstrating promise as a screening tool. Decision fusion also detected benign lesions similarly well (AUC=0.83 on normal vs. benign lesions) and was the only classifier to achieve any success in separating benign from malignant lesions (AUC=0.64 on benign vs. cancer). The classification results suggest that the assayed proteins are more indicative of a secondary effect, such as immune response, rather than specific for breast cancer. In conclusion, the decision fusion classifier demonstrated some promise in detecting breast lesions and outperformed other classifiers, especially for the very noisy classification problem of distinguishing benign from malignant lesions.

[1]  B. Asselain,et al.  Age as prognostic factor in premenopausal breast carcinoma , 1993, The Lancet.

[2]  L. Tabár,et al.  Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. New results swedish two‐county trial , 1995, Cancer.

[3]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[4]  William L. Bigbee,et al.  Multiplexed Immunobead-Based Cytokine Profiling for Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[5]  Belur V. Dasarathy Decision fusion strategies in multisensor environments , 1991, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[6]  Amy R. Reibman,et al.  Optimal Detection and Performance of Distributed Sensor Systems , 1987 .

[7]  T. J. Grabowski,et al.  Proteome-based plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease , 2007 .

[8]  Steve Goodison,et al.  Proteomic profiling identifies breast tumor metastasis‐associated factors in an isogenic model , 2007, Proteomics.

[9]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Decision fusion in a wireless sensor network with a large number of sensors , 2004 .

[10]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Stepwise linear discriminant analysis in computer-aided diagnosis: the effect of finite sample size , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[11]  H. W. Simpson,et al.  GENESIS OF BREAST CANCER IS IN THE PREMENOPAUSE , 1988, The Lancet.

[12]  Yehia Mechref,et al.  A cancer-associated PCNA expressed in breast cancer has implications as a potential biomarker , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  R Ferrini,et al.  Screening mammography for breast cancer: American College of Preventive Medicine practice policy statement. , 1996, American journal of preventive medicine.

[14]  S. Rubin,et al.  Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. , 1995, JAMA.

[15]  D. Levy,et al.  Multiple biomarkers for the prediction of first major cardiovascular events and death. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  C. Floyd,et al.  Optimized approach to decision fusion of heterogeneous data for breast cancer diagnosis. , 2006, Medical physics.

[17]  D C Slawson,et al.  Efficacy of screening mammography. , 1995, The Journal of family practice.

[18]  Robert R. Tenney,et al.  Detection with distributed sensors , 1980 .

[19]  P.K. Varshney,et al.  Optimal Data Fusion in Multiple Sensor Detection Systems , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[20]  J. Oesterling,et al.  Prostate specific antigen: a decade of discovery--what we have learned and where we are going. , 1999, The Journal of urology.