Comparative Analysis of a Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Source Camera Identification

In image forensics, there is widespread growing investigations for Source Camera Identification (SCI) to identify the legitimate source of an image by using different approaches including filtering-based techniques and deep neural networks. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to shed light on the application of source camera identification in digital forensic science via a comparative analysis of state-of-the art filtered-based technique and deep learning convolutional neural networks-based (CNN). To this end, the basic sensor pattern noise-based estimation technique using the Wiener filter in the wavelet domain is considered as well as deep learning CNN model in order to assess the effectiveness of SCI. Different experiments have been carried out on our database of images taken from eleven different cameras using the same set of training and test images with dimensions 128 × 128 and 256 × 256 for both approaches. From the results of the overall false positive rates, false negative rates and overall accuracy, this paper suggests that filtered-based PRNU approach for SCI outperforms the deep learning CNN approach in digital image forensics when limited number of images are available in forensic investigations.

[1]  Fouad Khelifi,et al.  On the SPN Estimation in Image Forensics: A Systematic Empirical Evaluation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[2]  Fouad Khelifi,et al.  Weighted averaging-based sensor pattern noise estimation for source camera identification , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[3]  Fouad Khelifi,et al.  A novel image filtering approach for sensor fingerprint estimation in source camera identification , 2015, 2015 12th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS).

[4]  Xiangui Kang,et al.  A context-adaptive SPN predictor for trustworthy source camera identification , 2014, EURASIP J. Image Video Process..

[5]  Miroslav Goljan,et al.  Digital camera identification from sensor pattern noise , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[6]  K. J. Ray Liu,et al.  A context adaptive predictor of sensor pattern noise for camera source identification , 2012, 2012 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[7]  Alessandro Foi,et al.  Image Denoising by Sparse 3-D Transform-Domain Collaborative Filtering , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  Chang-Tsun Li,et al.  PCA-based denoising of Sensor Pattern Noise for source camera identification , 2014, 2014 IEEE China Summit & International Conference on Signal and Information Processing (ChinaSIP).

[9]  Rainer Böhme,et al.  The 'Dresden Image Database' for benchmarking digital image forensics , 2010, SAC '10.

[10]  Marc Chaumont,et al.  Camera model identification with the use of deep convolutional neural networks , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS).

[11]  Paolo Bestagini,et al.  First Steps Toward Camera Model Identification With Convolutional Neural Networks , 2016, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[12]  Modesto Castrillón Santana,et al.  Deep learning for source camera identification on mobile devices , 2017, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[13]  Fouad Khelifi,et al.  Image Sharpening for Efficient Source Camera Identification Based on Sensor Pattern Noise Estimation , 2013, 2013 Fourth International Conference on Emerging Security Technologies.

[14]  Fouad Khelifi,et al.  Sensor Pattern Noise Estimation Based on Improved Locally Adaptive DCT Filtering and Weighted Averaging for Source Camera Identification and Verification , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.