Three dimensional limit analysis of suction bucket foundations

Abstract This paper presents a three dimensional limit method based on the upper bound theory for the stability of suction bucket foundations of offshore platforms. The bucket embedded in soil is subjected to a lateral load applied above the mud line. In order to simulate the lateral load, a fictitious soil layer is assumed, having a thickness equals to the vertical distance from the load point to the surface of the foundation. The unit weight and shear strength of the fictitious soil are set to be zero. The soil–bucket failure mechanism is approximated by a series of prisms. The three dimensional limit method starts from establishing a compatible velocity field and obtains the factor of safety by the energy and work balance equation. Optimization is followed to approach the critical failure mechanism that offers the minimum factor of safety. Two different basal surfaces are incorporated, i.e. an arbitrarily defined failure surface and a partly elliptical failure surface. Results of centrifuge modeling of bucket foundations are used to verify the method. The arbitrary failure surface provides more reasonable prediction than the partly elliptical failure surface. Being a multi-variable dependent problem, further investigation is needed to search for the critical failure mechanism.

[1]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[2]  Roger Fletcher,et al.  A Rapidly Convergent Descent Method for Minimization , 1963, Comput. J..

[3]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Vertical Capacity of Caisson Foundations In Calcareous Sediments , 1997 .

[4]  E. C. Clukey,et al.  The response of suction caissons in normally consolidated clays to cyclic TLP loading conditions , 1995 .

[5]  Alexander M. Puzrin,et al.  Upper bound limit analysis of circular foundations on clay under general loading , 2003 .

[6]  Zuyu Chen,et al.  Slope stability analysis by the upper bound approach: fundamentals and methods , 1997 .

[7]  Gang Wang,et al.  Stability of jetties for channel protection in soft soils at Huanghua Port , 2008 .

[8]  Charles Aubeny,et al.  Simplified limit solutions for the capacity of suction anchors under undrained conditions , 2005 .

[9]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Study of Seepage Flow And Sand Plug Loosening In Installation of Suction Caissons In Sand , 2005 .

[10]  Jacques Garnier,et al.  Physical Modeling of Suction Piles in Clay , 2004 .

[11]  Jian-Hua Yin,et al.  A three-dimensional slope stability analysis method using the upper bound theorem: Part I: theory and methods , 2001 .

[12]  P. Sparrevik,et al.  Suction Pile Technology and Installation in Deep Waters , 2002 .

[13]  Li Min Zhang,et al.  Centrifuge modeling of suction bucket foundations for platforms under ice-sheet-induced cyclic lateral loadings , 2007 .

[14]  S. Sarma STABILITY ANALYSIS OF EMBANKMENTS AND SLOPES , 1973 .

[15]  Wai-Fah Chen Limit Analysis and Soil Plasticity , 1975 .

[16]  Gang Wang,et al.  Safety evaluation of breakwaters based on physical and numerical modelling , 2009 .

[17]  Edward C. Clukey,et al.  Comparison of Analytical and Centrifuge Model Tests for Suction Caissons Subjected to Combined Loads , 2004 .

[18]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[19]  Lidija Zdravković,et al.  Pull-out Capacity of Bucket Foundations in Soft Clay , 2001 .