Identification with the neighborhood: Discrimination and neighborhood size

Abstract This paper analyzes the impact of a geographical social grouping (neighborhood) and its relative perceived size in the spontaneous group’s identification level and place satisfaction, as well as the intensity of and motives for discrimination against inhabitants of other places. Two studies are presented: an experimental one using the minimal group categorization paradigm and an onsite investigation of a city neighborhood. Consistent with the predictions, the results showed that smaller neighborhoods reported higher identification and satisfaction with the place of residence, as well as higher discrimination of other neighborhoods. In line with the optimal distinctiveness theory (ODT), the findings showed that the motivation for discrimination varies as a function of the in-group size. Thus, the members of larger groups discriminate by increasing the differentiation between the in-group and the out-group, whereas the members of smaller groups increased the value of the in-group. Furthermore, the results were consistent with a social identity theory and ODT explanation of diverse research that shows the non-trivial nature of geographical bounded social grouping and its importance in a diverse set of contexts and its impact in inter-neighborhood relationships.

[1]  R. Bourhis,et al.  Discrimination in the Minimal Group Paradigm: Social Identity or Self-Interest? , 1996 .

[2]  Frederick Rauscher,et al.  Evolutionary Psychology: Alternative Approaches , 2002 .

[3]  J. Palma-Oliveira,et al.  Place identity, place attachment and the scale of place: The impact of place salience Identidad de lugar, apego al lugar y escala del lugar: el impacto de la prominencia del lugar , 2013 .

[4]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  Dynamic models of segregation , 1971 .

[5]  K. Liebkind,et al.  Group size, group status and trait valence as determinants of intergroup bias: Stereotyping in Finland and Sweden , 2008 .

[6]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[7]  M. Brewer,et al.  In-Group Identification as a Function of Depersonalization, Distinctiveness, and Status , 1993 .

[8]  J. Palma-Oliveira,et al.  Place identity, place attachment and the scale of place: The impact of place salience , 2013 .

[9]  Fátima Bernardo and José Manuel Palma-Oliveira Place Identity: A Central Concept in Understanding Intergroup Relationships in the Urban Context , 2012 .

[10]  Geoffrey J. Leonardelli,et al.  Minority and Majority Discrimination: When and Why ☆ , 2001 .

[11]  N. Miller,et al.  Effects of numerical representation within cooperative settings: Examining the role of salience in in‐group favouritism , 1999 .

[12]  M. Brewer The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time , 1991 .

[13]  M. Brewer,et al.  The role of distinctiveness in social identity and group behaviour. , 1993 .

[14]  S. Reicher,et al.  Young people's deliberations on geographic mobility: Identity and cross-border relocation , 2006 .

[15]  D. Abrams Political distinctiveness: An identity optimising approach , 1994 .

[16]  V. Vignoles,et al.  Identity motives and in-group favouritism: a new approach to individual differences in intergroup discrimination. , 2007, The British journal of social psychology.

[17]  B. Simon,et al.  Self-stereotyping and social context: the effects of relative in-group size and in-group status. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  P. Mouritzen City size and citizens' satisfaction: two competing theories revisited , 1989 .

[19]  Matthew J. Hornsey,et al.  Subgroup differentiation as a response to an overly‐inclusive group: a test of optimal distinctiveness theory , 1999 .

[20]  John C. Turner,et al.  Some comments on… ‘the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm’ , 1983 .

[21]  Steve Hinkle,et al.  Recognizing group diversity: Individualist‐collectivist and autonomous‐relational social orientations and their implications for intergroup processes , 1992 .

[22]  Geoffrey J. Leonardelli,et al.  Optimal Distinctiveness Theory : A Framework for Social Identity , Social Cognition , and Intergroup Relations , 2016 .

[23]  A. Lindridge Culture and Social Identity , 2015 .

[24]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[25]  J. Turner Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. , 2010 .

[26]  M. Cinnirella,et al.  National identification, type and specificity of comparison and their effects on descriptions of national character , 2007 .

[27]  M. Brewer,et al.  Self-evaluation effects of interpersonal versus intergroup social comparison. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  Per Fahlander Encounters | Materialities | Confrontations: Archaeologies of Social Space and Interaction , 2007 .

[29]  M. Bonaiuto,et al.  Multiplace Analysis of the Urban Environment , 1996 .

[30]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. , 2000 .

[31]  M. Hidalgo,et al.  PLACE ATTACHMENT AND PLACE IDENTITY IN NATIVES AND NON-NATIVES , 2007 .

[32]  L. Caporael Evolution, Groups, and Scaffolded Minds , 2013 .

[33]  Michael D. Silver,et al.  The Impact of Assimilation and Differentiation Needs on Perceived Group Importance and Judgments of Ingroup Size , 2002 .

[34]  M. Giannini,et al.  Positive auto-sterotyping and self-construal as predictors of national identification , 2005 .

[35]  G. Breakwell,et al.  Identity Processes and Environmental Threat: the Effects of Nationalism and Local Identity upon Perception of Beach Pollution , 1996 .

[36]  H. Tajfel The Formation of National Attitudes: A Social-Psychological Perspective , 2017 .

[37]  V. Vignoles,et al.  Towards an integrative model of place identification: Dimensionality and predictors of intrapersonal-level place preferences , 2010 .

[38]  J. Dennis Lord,et al.  Residential satisfaction in scattered-site public housing projects , 1987 .

[39]  M. Hidalgo,et al.  Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions , 2001 .

[40]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Urban district identity as a common ingroup identity: The different role of ingroup prototypicality for minority and majority groups , 2012 .

[41]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  L. G. Marqués,et al.  National Identities and Levels of Categorization: Self-Stereotypes, Attitudes and Perception of Other Nationalities , 1988 .

[43]  H. Proshansky,et al.  Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self , 1983 .

[44]  P. Healey Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies , 1997 .

[45]  Mark Rubin,et al.  Intergroup bias. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[46]  P. Smaldino,et al.  Agent-based modeling as a tool for studying social identity processes: The case of optimal distinctiveness theory , 2011 .

[47]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Aspects of national and ethnic loyalty , 1970 .

[48]  L. Caporael Repeated Assembly: Prospects for Saying What We Mean , 2003 .

[49]  Bernd Simon,et al.  Perceived intragroup homogeneity in minority-majority contexts. , 1987 .

[50]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Agent-Based Modeling: A New Approach for Theory Building in Social Psychology , 2007, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[51]  M. Brewer,et al.  Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. , 1996 .

[52]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[53]  Bernd Simon,et al.  The Social Psychology of Minority‐Majority Relations , 2008 .

[54]  M. Cinnirella Manipulating stereotype rating tasks: understanding questionnaire context effects on measures of attitudes, social identity and stereotypes , 1998 .

[55]  M. Brewer,et al.  Chapter 2 - Optimal Distinctiveness Theory: A Framework for Social Identity, Social Cognition, and Intergroup Relations , 2010 .

[56]  N. Hopkins,et al.  The role of the ‘other’ in national identity: exploring the context‐dependence of the national ingroup stereotype , 1999 .

[57]  Robin I. M. Dunbar Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans , 1993, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[58]  Jolanda Jetten,et al.  The Individual Within the Group: Balancing the Need to Belong With the Need to Be Different , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[59]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Dual identities in intergroup contact: group status and size moderate the generalization of positive attitude change , 2006 .

[60]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism , 1979 .

[61]  Florian G. Kaiser,et al.  Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study , 2009 .

[62]  John C. Turner,et al.  Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories , 1999 .

[63]  Oscar Newman,et al.  Defensible Space: A New Physical Planning Tool for Urban Revitalization , 1995 .

[64]  E. Jablonka,et al.  Evolution in Four Dimensions , 2005 .

[65]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Physical and Psychological Factors in Sense of Community , 2004 .

[66]  Dominic Abrams,et al.  Social Identity on a National Scale: Optimal Distinctiveness and Young People's Self-Expression Through Musical Preference , 2009 .

[67]  M. Lewicka What makes neighborhood different from home and city? Effects of place scale on place attachment ☆ , 2010 .