Computer-aided classification of breast masses using contrast-enhanced digital mammograms

By taking advantages of both mammography and breast MRI, contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) has emerged as a new promising imaging modality to improve efficacy of breast cancer screening and diagnosis. The primary objective of study is to develop and evaluate a new computer-aided detection and diagnosis (CAD) scheme of CEDM images to classify between malignant and benign breast masses. A CEDM dataset consisting of 111 patients (33 benign and 78 malignant) was retrospectively assembled. Each case includes two types of images namely, low-energy (LE) and dual-energy subtracted (DES) images. First, CAD scheme applied a hybrid segmentation method to automatically segment masses depicting on LE and DES images separately. Optimal segmentation results from DES images were also mapped to LE images and vice versa. Next, a set of 109 quantitative image features related to mass shape and density heterogeneity was initially computed. Last, four multilayer perceptron-based machine learning classifiers integrated with correlationbased feature subset evaluator and leave-one-case-out cross-validation method was built to classify mass regions depicting on LE and DES images, respectively. Initially, when CAD scheme was applied to original segmentation of DES and LE images, the areas under ROC curves were 0.7585±0.0526 and 0.7534±0.0470, respectively. After optimal segmentation mapping from DES to LE images, AUC value of CAD scheme significantly increased to 0.8477±0.0376 (p<0.01). Since DES images eliminate overlapping effect of dense breast tissue on lesions, segmentation accuracy was significantly improved as compared to regular mammograms, the study demonstrated that computer-aided classification of breast masses using CEDM images yielded higher performance.

[1]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique , 2002, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[2]  Bin Zheng,et al.  Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses using visually sensitive image features. , 2017, Journal of X-ray science and technology.

[3]  Bin Zheng,et al.  Applying Quantitative CT Image Feature Analysis to Predict Response of Ovarian Cancer Patients to Chemotherapy. , 2017, Academic radiology.

[4]  Sisi Zhao,et al.  CT pulmonary angiography using different noise index values with an iterative reconstruction algorithm and dual energy CT imaging using different body mass indices: Image quality and radiation dose. , 2017, Journal of X-ray science and technology.

[5]  B Zheng,et al.  Computer-aided detection of breast masses depicted on full-field digital mammograms: a performance assessment. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[6]  อนิรุธ สืบสิงห์,et al.  Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques , 2014 .

[7]  Yong Wang,et al.  Diagnostic value of single-source dual-energy spectral computed tomography for papillary thyroid microcarcinomas. , 2017, Journal of X-ray science and technology.

[8]  Bin Zheng,et al.  Applying a new quantitative global breast MRI feature analysis scheme to assess tumor response to chemotherapy , 2016, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  Shiju Yan,et al.  A new approach to develop computer-aided diagnosis scheme of breast mass classification using deep learning technology. , 2017, Journal of X-ray science and technology.

[10]  John Brodersen,et al.  Long-Term Psychosocial Consequences of False-Positive Screening Mammography , 2013, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[11]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Individual and Combined Effects of Age, Breast Density, and Hormone Replacement Therapy Use on the Accuracy of Screening Mammography , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[12]  Felix Diekmann,et al.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study , 2012, Breast Cancer Research.

[13]  Bin Zheng,et al.  Computerized prediction of risk for developing breast cancer based on bilateral mammographic breast tissue asymmetry. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[14]  Georgia D. Tourassi,et al.  A Concentric Morphology Model for the Detection of Masses in Mammography , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Y H Chang,et al.  Computerized detection of masses in digitized mammograms using single-image segmentation and a multilayer topographic feature analysis. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[16]  D. Kopans,et al.  Cumulative Probability of False-Positive Recall or Biopsy Recommendation After 10 Years of Screening Mammography: A Cohort Study , 2012 .

[17]  Martin J Yaffe,et al.  Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience. , 2003, Radiology.

[18]  Robert M. Nishikawa,et al.  Current status and future directions of computer-aided diagnosis in mammography , 2007, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[19]  Shiju Yan,et al.  Improving lung cancer prognosis assessment by incorporating synthetic minority oversampling technique and score fusion method. , 2016, Medical physics.

[20]  David Gur,et al.  Association Between Changes in Mammographic Image Features and Risk for Near-Term Breast Cancer Development , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  Etta D Pisano,et al.  Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. , 2012, JAMA.

[22]  Arnau Oliver,et al.  A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images , 2010, Medical Image Anal..