Are Bioretention Cells Being Installed Per Design Standards in North Carolina? A Field Study

AbstractForty-three bioretention cells (BRCs) throughout North Carolina were assessed for maintenance needs, soil media composition, and as-built surface storage volume to determine whether BRCs are typically constructed per their intended design specifications. Visual inspections identified hydric soils and redoximorphic features (indicators of prolonged anaerobic conditions) and quantified the occurrence of issues requiring maintenance. Particle-size distribution and permeability of soil media were measured at multiple locations within each cell, and topographic surveys were performed to calculate as-built surface storage volumes. Field drawdown tests were used to verify permeability measurements and assess overall BRC function. Of the studied cells, 22% contained redoximorphic features in the upper 30 cm, and 53% were in need of maintenance due to one or more factors. Although 71% of assessed cells failed to meet soil media particle-size distribution specifications, 98% of BRCs contained media with ade...

[1]  W. Hunt,et al.  Underdrain Configuration to Enhance Bioretention Exfiltration to Reduce Pollutant Loads , 2011 .

[2]  C. Heip,et al.  Bioturbation: a fresh look at Darwin's last idea. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  R. Winston,et al.  Evaluation of undersized bioretention stormwater control measures for treatment of highway bridge deck runoff. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[4]  Yves Filion,et al.  Review of Bioretention System Research and Design: Past, Present, and Future , 2010 .

[5]  William F. Hunt,et al.  Mitigation of Impervious Surface Hydrology Using Bioretention in North Carolina and Maryland , 2009 .

[6]  G. Gee,et al.  Particle-size Analysis , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[7]  T. Ellsworth,et al.  Effect of root systems on preferential flow in swelling soil , 1995 .

[8]  S. Clark,et al.  Storm-Water Filter Media Pollutant Retention under Aerobic versus Anaerobic Conditions , 2009 .

[9]  A. R. Jarrett,et al.  Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina , 2006 .

[10]  Shen-En Chen,et al.  Compaction’s Impacts on Urban Storm-Water Infiltration , 2008 .

[11]  Ana Deletic,et al.  Hydrologic and pollutant removal performance of stormwater biofiltration systems at the field scale , 2009 .

[12]  A. Davis,et al.  Nitrogen Removal from Urban Stormwater Runoff Through Layered Bioretention Columns , 2007, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[13]  John L. Nieber,et al.  Performance Assessment of Rain Gardens 1 , 2009 .

[14]  Donald D. Carpenter,et al.  Influence of Planting Soil Mix Characteristics on Bioretention Cell Design and Performance , 2010 .

[15]  W. Hunt,et al.  Bioretention Technology: Overview of Current Practice and Future Needs , 2009 .

[16]  Ana Deletic,et al.  Hydraulic and pollutant removal performance of fine media stormwater filtration systems. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  C. Craft,et al.  Morphological Features of Seasonally Reduced Soils , 2000 .

[18]  William F. Hunt,et al.  Impacts of Media Depth on Effluent Water Quality and Hydrologic Performance of Undersized Bioretention Cells , 2011 .

[19]  Michael E. Dietz,et al.  Saturation to improve pollutant retention in a rain garden. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Allen P. Davis,et al.  Urban Particle Capture in Bioretention Media. I: Laboratory and Field Studies , 2008 .

[21]  S. Thien.  A flow diagram for teaching texture‐by‐feel analysis , 1979 .

[22]  Robert G. Traver,et al.  Meeting Hydrologic and Water Quality Goals through Targeted Bioretention Design , 2012 .

[23]  M. Borst,et al.  Hydraulic Test of a Bioretention Media Carbon Amendment , 2010 .