A parametric study of electrical discharge machining process parameters on machining of cast Al/B4C metal matrix nanocomposites

Aluminium metal matrix nanocomposite reinforced with 0.5 wt% B4C nanoparticles was prepared by a novel ultrasonic cavitation method. The metal matrix nanocomposite was studied microscopically to ascertain the uniform distribution and the degree of dispersion of the B4C nanoparticles within the aluminium metal matrix. Electrical discharge machining was employed to machine the metal matrix nanocomposite with copper electrode by adopting response surface methodology using face-centred central composite design technique. This method has been applied to investigate the influence of process parameters and their interactions. Furthermore, a mathematical model has been formulated in order to study the machining characteristics. It has been observed that pulse current was found to be the most important factor that affects the characteristics of all the three output parameters such as material removal rate, electrode wear rate and surface roughness. The pulse current and pulse on time have statistical significance on both electrode wear rate and surface roughness. Higher pulse off time lowers the electrode wear rate value, whereas both pulse current and pulse on time increase the electrode wear rate. Similarly, surface roughness also increases with increase in pulse current and pulse on time. From the analyses, the optimum combination of the parameters has been identified for the metal matrix nanocomposite. The results obtained from the confirmation experiments were compared with the experimental results and found that errors are in the acceptable range.

[1]  Pradeep K. Rohatgi,et al.  Metal Matrix Composites , 2020, Composite Materials.

[2]  F. Müller,et al.  Non-conventional machining of particle reinforced metal matrix composite , 2000 .

[3]  F. Müller,et al.  Non-conventional machining of particle reinforced metal matrix composites , 2001 .

[4]  L. Froyen,et al.  Microstructure and interface characteristics of B4C, SiC and Al2O3 reinforced Al matrix composites: a comparative study , 2001 .

[5]  A. Rajadurai,et al.  Effect of SiC and rotation of electrode on electric discharge machining of Al–SiC composite , 2002 .

[6]  M. Hashmi,et al.  Particle distribution in cast metal matrix composites—Part I , 2002 .

[7]  Xiaochun Li,et al.  Microstructure and microhardness of SiC nanoparticles reinforced magnesium composites fabricated by ultrasonic method , 2004 .

[8]  P.Narender Singh,et al.  Electric discharge machining of Al–10%SiCP as-cast metal matrix composites , 2004 .

[9]  P. M. George,et al.  EDM machining of carbon–carbon composite—a Taguchi approach , 2004 .

[10]  J. Kruth,et al.  Investigation of material removal mechanisms in EDM of composite ceramic materials , 2004 .

[11]  L. Miao,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of anatase/rutile–TiO2 thin films by magnetron sputtering: a review , 2005 .

[12]  H. Awaji,et al.  Nanocomposites—a new material design concept , 2005 .

[13]  C. Çoğun,et al.  An experimental investigation of tool wear in electric discharge machining , 2006 .

[14]  R. Purohit,et al.  Mathematical modeling of electric discharge machining of cast Al-4Cu-6Si alloy-10wt.% SiCp composites , 2007 .

[15]  A. Abdullah,et al.  Effect of ultrasonic-assisted EDM on the surface integrity of cemented tungsten carbide (WC-Co) , 2009 .

[16]  Ko-Ta Chiang,et al.  Modeling and analysis of the effects of machining parameters on the performance characteristics in the EDM process of Al2O3+TiC mixed ceramic , 2008 .

[17]  T. A. El-Taweel.  Multi-response optimization of EDM with Al–Cu–Si–TiC P/M composite electrode , 2009 .

[18]  V. N. Gaitonde,et al.  Investigations into the effect of tool shapes with size factor consideration in sink electrical discharge machining (EDM) process , 2009 .

[19]  V. N. Gaitonde,et al.  Some Studies in Metal Matrix Composites Machining using Response Surface Methodology , 2009 .

[20]  P. V. Rao,et al.  The effect of process parameters on machining of magnesium nano alumina composites through EDM , 2010 .

[21]  J. Davim,et al.  Role of Powder in the Machining of Al-10%Sicp Metal Matrix Composites by Powder Mixed Electric Discharge Machining , 2011 .

[22]  R. Bhushan,et al.  Influence of SiC Particles Distribution and Their Weight Percentage on 7075 Al Alloy , 2011 .

[23]  Seung-Han Yang,et al.  Multiple-response optimization for micro-endmilling process using response surface methodology , 2011 .

[24]  Y. Wong,et al.  Study on the nano-powder-mixed sinking and milling micro-EDM of WC-Co , 2011 .

[25]  T. A. El-Taweel,et al.  Performance analysis of wire electrochemical turning process—RSM approach , 2011 .

[26]  I. Murthy,et al.  Microstructure and mechanical properties of aluminum–fly ash nano composites made by ultrasonic method , 2012 .

[27]  Xiaochun Li,et al.  Nanoparticle effects in cast Mg-1 wt% SiC nano-composites , 2012 .

[28]  P. Agarwal,et al.  Statistical optimization of the electrospinning process for chitosan/polylactide nanofabrication using response surface methodology , 2012, Journal of Materials Science.

[29]  J. Davim,et al.  Analysis of Surface Integrity in Drilling Metal Matrix and Hybrid Metal Matrix Composites , 2012 .

[30]  J. Davim.  Machining of Metal Matrix Composites , 2012 .