Origins and endpoints of the core systems of number. Reply to Fias and Verguts

In summary, we follow Feigenson et al.’s proposal todistinguish two core systems of number. In addition weoffer a specific theory of how symbolic and approximatenumber representations can develop and the relationbetween them by describing how one and the same systemcan behave differently depending on the type of input: inan approximate way with non-symbolic stimuli, in anexact way with symbolic stimuli.

[1]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Semantic priming in number naming , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[2]  Michaël A. Stevens,et al.  A model of exact small-number representation , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Primed numbers : Exploring the modularity of numerical representations with masked and unmasked semantic priming , 1999 .

[4]  The mental number line: exact and approximate , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  The neural basis of the Weber–Fechner law: a logarithmic mental number line , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  J. Carey,et al.  Free journals for developing countries , 2002 .

[7]  Wim Fias,et al.  Representation of Number in Animals and Humans: A Neural Model , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  K. Wynn Children's acquisition of the number words and the counting system , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[10]  Paul B. Buckley,et al.  Comparisons of digits and dot patterns. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words , 1992, Cognition.

[12]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Preverbal and verbal counting and computation , 1992, Cognition.

[13]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Development of Elementary Numerical Abilities: A Neuronal Model , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.