The role of controversy in engineering design

Abstract To ensure the acceptance of technical systems and products in society, the crucial role of social controversy in technology development has to be more openly recognized. Many of the current acceptance problems of technical systems developed because the social controversy generated by the system under design was not sufficiently taken into account. Actively managed and organized controversy, on the other hand, could become an integral part of the engineering design process and the basis for a new underlying philosophy of design. Technical design in companies and technological organizations could be opened up to the active involvement of social actors usually excluded from it (like the actual users of the technology as well as potentially affected social groups), to allow for the incorporation of more diverse points of view into the design of new technical systems; in this way, socially and ecologically, as well as technically and economically more acceptable solutions could be generated.

[1]  David J. Hess,et al.  Science and technology in a multicultural world , 1994 .

[2]  Roland Schinzinger,et al.  Ethics in Engineering , 1983 .

[3]  M. Hård Beyond Harmony and Consensus: A Social Conflict Approach to Technology , 1993 .

[4]  C. Bullard Shaping technology/Building society , 1994 .

[5]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the Post-Normal Age , 1993, Commonplace.

[6]  B. Wynne Redefining the issues of risk and public acceptance: The social viability of technology , 1983 .

[7]  Arnold Pacey,et al.  Culture technology , 1986, CABI Compendium.

[8]  R. Westrum The Social Construction of Technological Systems , 1989 .

[9]  Thomas J. Misa,et al.  Managing Technology in Society , 1995 .

[10]  S. Hacker,et al.  Military Enterprise and Technological Change: Perspectives on the American Experience , 1986 .

[11]  B. Latour Science in Action , 1987 .

[12]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Designing complex technology: Understanding it as of, by, and for people: Some dilemmas and what to do about them , 1989 .

[13]  Johan Schot,et al.  Constructive Technology Assessment and Technology Dynamics: The Case of Clean Technologies , 1992, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[14]  G. Syme,et al.  Public Involvement as a Negotiation Process , 1989 .

[15]  Daniel J. Fiorino Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms , 1990 .

[16]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Research on the management of innovation : the Minnesota studies , 1991 .

[17]  Lyn Kathlene,et al.  Enhancing citizen participation: Panel designs, perspectives, and policy formation , 1991 .

[18]  J. Wise Decisions in Design , 1985 .

[19]  Adela Cortina Orts Ética aplicada y democracia radical , 1993 .