Diffuse scattering of lamellar optical gratings due to line edge roughness

In recent years, the scattering properties of optical gratings became of high interest. In particular, the effect of line edge roughness (LER) in lamellar diffraction gratings was identified to be a potential source of stray light. In this contribution the LER-induced scattering spectrum of such gratings is investigated. The straight-forward method to calculate the angle resolved scattering (ARS) is offered by two-dimensional simulation tools, e.g. the rigorous coupled wave analysis (RCWA). Unfortunately, this approach suffers from computation times that typically lie in the range of several days. As a simplification, we apply a novel one-dimensional rigorous approach1 that permits the prediction of ARS along the dispersion direction of the grating within a feasible computation time. As the 1D-model only accounts for the LER-parameter σ and neglects the correlation length ξ and the roughness exponent α, analytical considerations must be employed in order to adapt the 1D-simulation results to the 2D-reality.1 The model is verified by comparison to the 2D-model and ARS-measurements of E-beam exposed gratings with artificially induced (and strongly determined) LER. Based on the derived 1D-model, the effects of different parameters on the straylight performance of a high performance spectrometer grating is investigated. As a result we find that not only the roughness parameters but also the grating geometry has a significant effect especially on the spatial distribution of the scattered light. In other words, the strength of the scattered light next to the (spectrometric) useful diffraction order can be controlled by the grating geometry, too. Hence, the presented algorithm might be a useful tool for designing gratings with strong straylight specifications.

[1]  Chris A. Mack Line-edge roughness and the ultimate limits of lithography , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[2]  Joerg Bischoff,et al.  Scatterometry modeling for gratings with roughness and irregularities , 2016, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[3]  Uwe D. Zeitner,et al.  High-performance dielectric diffraction gratings for space applications , 2012, Other Conferences.

[4]  Stefan Kraft,et al.  Fluorescence imaging spectrometer concepts for the Earth explorer mission candidate flex , 2017, International Conference on Space Optics.

[5]  Cornelis W. Hagen,et al.  Determination of line edge roughness in low-dose top-down scanning electron microscopy images , 2014 .

[6]  E. Gogolides,et al.  A review of line edge roughness and surface nanotexture resulting from patterning processes , 2006 .

[7]  D. Michaelis,et al.  Diffuse scattering due to stochastic disturbances of 1D-gratings on the example of line edge roughness. , 2018, Optics express.

[8]  B. Shore,et al.  High-efficiency fused-silica transmission gratings. , 1997, Optics letters.

[9]  Tina Clausnitzer,et al.  Highly efficient polarization-independent transmission gratings for pulse stretching and compression , 2004, SPIE Optical Systems Design.

[10]  T. Gaylord,et al.  Formulation for stable and efficient implementation of the rigorous coupled-wave analysis of binary gratings , 1995 .

[11]  Thomas Herbert Naylor Computer Simulation Techniques , 1966 .

[12]  Chris A. Mack A Simple Model of Line-Edge Roughness , 2010 .

[13]  M. Al-Kuhaili,et al.  Optical properties of chromium oxide thin films deposited by electron-beam evaporation , 2007 .

[14]  Martin Heusinger,et al.  Rowland ghost suppression in high efficiency spectrometer gratings fabricated by e-beam lithography. , 2017, Optics express.

[15]  H. Gross,et al.  Impact of different stochastic line edge roughness patterns on measurements in scatterometry - A simulation study , 2017 .

[16]  Z. T. Khodair,et al.  Studying the optical properties of ( Cr2O3:I ) thin films prepared by spray pyrolysis technique , 2012 .

[17]  R. W. Christy,et al.  Optical constants of transition metals: Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Pd , 1974 .

[18]  F. Lévy,et al.  Characterization of sputter-deposited chromium oxide thin films , 1999 .

[19]  J.-L. Bézy,et al.  FIMAS: feasibility study of a fluorescence imaging spectrometer to be flown on a small platform in tandem with Sentinel 3 , 2017, International Conference on Space Optics.

[20]  Thomas A. Germer,et al.  Modeling the effect of line profile variation on optical critical dimension metrology , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[21]  E. Kley,et al.  High performance diffraction gratings made by e-beam lithography , 2011 .

[22]  E. Hannan,et al.  The Statistical Theory of Linear Systems. , 1990 .

[23]  Angeliki Tserepi,et al.  Quantification of line-edge roughness of photoresists. II. Scaling and fractal analysis and the best roughness descriptors , 2003 .

[24]  Frank Scholze,et al.  Effect of line roughness on the diffraction intensities in angular resolved scatterometry , 2010 .

[25]  Thomas J Suleski,et al.  Effective medium approximations for modeling optical reflectance from gratings with rough edges. , 2010, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[26]  J. E. Harvey,et al.  Modeling of light scattering in different regimes of surface roughness. , 2011, Optics express.

[27]  Chris A. Mack Analytical expression for impact of linewidth roughness on critical dimension uniformity , 2014 .