This paper analyses the international comparability of methods used to convert the value added of the office and computing machinery sector (OCM) into constant prices for nine OECD countries. It concludes that the variations which exist in the price indexes are largely due to differences in the methods countries use to capture changes in the quality of an industry's output over time. The paper evaluates the impact of these different OCM price indexes on the growth rate of labour productivity during the 1980s by conducting a sensitivity test where the US OCM index is substituted for each of the individual country indexes. This experiment causes the OCM labour productivity growth rate to change by over a factor of ten for several countries. This result suggests that international comparisons of labour productivity should not be made for the OCM sector using the official data, and that labour productivity comparisons of sectors OCM belongs to—non-electrical machinery and fabricated metal products and machine...
[1]
Paul Stoneman,et al.
Double Deflation and the Measurement of Output and Productivity in UK Manufacturing 1979–89
,
1994
.
[2]
Robert Z. Lawrence.
How Open is Japan
,
1991
.
[3]
Robert J. Gordon,et al.
Measurement Issues and the Productivity Slowdown in Five Major Industrial Countries
,
1991
.
[4]
M. Baily,et al.
The Productivity Slowdown, Measurement Issues, and the Explosion of Computer Power
,
1989
.
[5]
Robert Z. Lawrence.
U.S. Current Account Adjustment: An Appraisal
,
1990
.
[6]
D. Jorgenson,et al.
PRODUCTIVITY LEVELS IN GERMANY, JAPAN, AND THE UNITED-STATES - DIFFERENCES AND CAUSES
,
1993
.