The Common Pool Dilemma of Global Public Goods: Lessons from the World Bank's Net Income and Reserves

The function of international organizations (IOs) as suppliers of international or global public goods (GPGs) has received increasing attention in recent years. But in a world with many claimants and limited resources, GPGs are more likely to have common pool properties than be pure public goods. The paper develops a joint-products model of public goods supply by international organizations, examining how specific institutional features of international organizations affect the supply of GPGs. The sources and distribution of the World Bank's net income—the single largest source of discretionary funds available annually to an IO—are used as the lens to analyze the issue. The paper examines the tension between control rights on net income (which reside primarily with nonborrowing shareholders) and the sources of net income, which largely lie with minority, borrowing shareholders. The analysis suggests that while the joint-product model of member-country support for international organizations has much merit, institutional features that were incorporated when these institutions were established sharply affect both the absolute magnitude and the distribution ratio of the benefit streams.

[1]  Kenneth S. Rogoff,et al.  International Institutions for Reducing Global Financial Instability , 1999 .

[2]  B. Rosewell,et al.  An Independent and Accountable IMF , 1999 .

[3]  Kenneth A. Oye Cooperation under Anarchy , 1986 .

[4]  M. Kahler Capital Flows and Financial Crises , 1998 .

[5]  J. Ruggie Multilateralism: the anatomy of an institution , 1992, International Organization.

[6]  J. Broz,et al.  Origins of the Federal Reserve System: International Incentives and the Domestic Free-rider Problem , 1999, International Organization.

[7]  T. Sandler,et al.  The Future of Development Assistance: Common Pools and International Public Goods , 1999 .

[8]  A. Thorpe,et al.  When goliaths clash: US and EU differences over the labeling of food products derived from genetically modified organisms , 2004 .

[9]  Lisa L. Martin,et al.  Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions , 1998, International Organization.

[10]  Strom C. Thacker,et al.  The High Politics of IMF Lending , 1999, World Politics.

[11]  M. Finnemore,et al.  National Interests in International Society , 1996 .

[12]  R. Bird Fiscal federalism , 2019, Federalism in China and Russia.

[13]  J. Boughton Silent Revolution: The International Monetary Fund, 1979-89 , 2001 .

[14]  A. Sivaramakrishnan The future of development assistance. , 2001 .

[15]  基欧汉,et al.  霸权之后 : 世界政治经济中的合作与纷争 = After Hegemony , 2001 .

[16]  Cheryl Shanks,et al.  Inertia and change in the constellation of international governmental organizations, 1981–1992 , 1996, International Organization.

[17]  Inge Kaul,et al.  Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century , 1999 .

[18]  Kenneth W. Abbott,et al.  Why States Act through Formal International Organizations , 1998 .